CRM-M No. 36577 of 2026 · Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. disposed of with a direction to The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3- Commissioner of Police, respondent No. Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana, to decide representation dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P representation the…
- Para 66. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajaypal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.(Oral) Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. ***
#1. The petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for directing official respondents to official respondents to register FIR against the private respondent register FIR against the private respondent and to take action on take action on representation dated in a time bound dated 27.04.2026 in a time bound manner.
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioner private the petitioners submits that private respondent No.5, who was a journalist working with Da respondent No.5 vera misused who was a journalist working with Dainik Savera misused his position and fraudulently induced the petitioner his position and sum of induced the petitioner to handover a sum of Rs.2 lacs on false pretext of procuring on false pretext of procuring official official police security. Respondent No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriated the No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriate No.5, however, did not arrange any security cover and misappropriate money. When petitioner confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and . When petitioner confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and confronted him, he criminally intimidated him and extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed extended threats to involve him in a false case. In this regard, a detailed representation was made to respondent No.3 but no action was taken. representation was made to The respondent No.3 but no action was taken. The limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. limited prayer is to decide the representation moved by the petitioner.
#3. Notice of motion to official respondents. Notice of motion to official respon 2 CRM-M-36577 36577-2026 (O&M)
#4. who is present in Court, Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents accepts notice on behalf n instructions from HC of the official respondents. On instructions from HC representation against the private Hardeep Singh, he submits that petitioner’s representation against the private representation against the private Hardeep Singh, respondents was received was received and the same was pending. and the same was pending.
#5. disposed of with a direction to The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3- Commissioner of Police, respondent No. Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana, to decide representation dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P representation the petitioner (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner within a period of one month from today within a period of by passing a reasoned and from today, by passing a reasoned and and take necessary action, if so required. speaking order, as per law and take necessary action, if so required. speaking order
#6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE
09.07.2026 Kapil Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 09 Jul 2026. The bench was SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.