Jagsir Singh v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
NAMIT KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Dr. Sumati Jund and Mr. Rahul Saini, Advocates, Dr. Sumati Jund and Mr. Rahul Saini, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) NAMIT KUMAR
#1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the India seeking a writ of s, who are stated to have been working on various services of the petitioners, who are stated to have been working on various s, who are stated to have been working on various services of the petitioner 8 years in view of the judgment rendered by posts for the last more than 7-8 years in view of the judgment rendered by 8 years in view of the judgment rendered by posts for the last more than 7 Jaggo Vs. Union of India & others, AIR 2025 Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Jaggo Vs. Union of India & others, AIR 2025 Jaggo Vs. Union of India & others, AIR 2025 Hon’ble the Supreme Court in SC 296 and by this Court in and by this Court in Daljeet Singh & others Vs. Sta te of Punjab & Daljeet Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab & another (CWP (CWP-5684-2026 decided on 22.04.2026 Further, directions have 22.04.2026). Further, directions have regular pay scale along been sought to grant all consequential benefits i.e. regular pay scale along been sought to grant all consequential benefits i.e. been sought to grant all consequential benefits i.e. with payment of arrears of pay & allowances, due increments, consideration with payment of arrears of pay & allowances, due increments, consideration with payment of arrears of pay & allowances, due increments, consideration with payment of arrears of pay & allowances, due increments, consideration ority & resultant promotion thereof to the petitioners from the of relative seniority & resultant promotion thereof to the petitioners from the ority & resultant promotion thereof to the petitioners from the of relative seni directions have been sought to grant date of their regularization. Further, directions have been sought to grant directions have been sought to grant date of their regularization. equal pay scale along with other benefits to the petitioner, till they are equal pay scale along with other benefits to the petitioner, till they are equal pay scale along with other benefits to the petitioner, till they are equal pay scale along with other benefits to the petitioner, till they are 2026 (O&M) CWP-20327-2026 (O&M) (2) regularized in view of law laid down by in view of law laid down by Hon’ble the Supreme Court State Hon’ble the Supreme Court in State
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Jul 2026. The bench was NAMIT KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.