Mohammad Shahid & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Feb 2026
- Bench
- VINOD S BHARDWA
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 528
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 316(2), 318(4)
- Emigration Act, 1983 s. 24
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Pending
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Mr. Navdeep Jain, Advocate for Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunny K. Singla for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. AG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, The instant petition has been filed under Section The instant petition has been filed under Section quashing of FIR No.24 dated 21.09.2024 registered under Sections 2023 for quashing of FIR No.24 dated 21.09.2024 registered under Sections quashing of FIR No.24 dated 21.09.2024 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 316(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 24 of the Emigration Act, 1983 at Police Station NRI, District Jalandhar along with all Emigration Act, 1983 at Police Station NRI, District Jalandhar along with all Emigration Act, 1983 at Police Station NRI, District Jalandhar along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise annexed as Annexure P-2. annexed as Annexure P
way of an affidavit of Satinder Short reply dated 17.11.2025 by way of an affidavit of Satinder Short reply dated 17.11.2025 by Kumar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, NRI Wing, Sub-Division Kumar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, NRI Wing, Sub Kumar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, NRI Wing, Sub has already been filed on behalf the respondent/State. The same Jalandhar-2 has already been filed on behalf the respondent/State. The same has already been filed on behalf the respondent/State. The same is taken on record. is taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that the compromise has not matured inter se between the parties, hence, he compromise has not matured inter se between the parties, hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage. may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage. may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage.
Operative part
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as In view of the above, the present petition is In view of the above, the present petition is withdrawn at this stage. withdrawn at this stage.
application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Pending
12.02.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.02.13 19:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 316(2), 318(4); Emigration Act, 1983 — s. 24.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Feb 2026. The bench was VINOD S BHARDWA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.