GURMEET SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. November 07, 2025 Deepak DPA (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Judgment
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for respondents-U.T. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to appoint him on compassionate ground.
Petitioner’s father was working as Tubewell Operator with Public Health Department, Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the respondent at the outset submits that petitioner has alternative remedy to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. This Court should refrain from passing any order.
Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with permission to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6094-2018 -2-
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. November 07, 2025 Deepak DPA (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 07 Nov 2025. The bench was JAGMOHAN BANSAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.