I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI v. Kumar Rahul, IAS & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 27 Oct 2025
- Bench
- K A SARI N
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 215
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 11
Judgment
Present : Mr. Risham Raag, Advocate for Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG Punjab. AL K A SARI N, J. (Or al)
This is a petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and Sections 10 and 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of proceedings against the respondents for violation of the order dated
21.01.2025 passed in RA-CW-63-2020 modifying the judgment dated
18.12.2018 passed in CWP-23944-2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioners’ states that the amount has since been received by the petitioners.
In view o f the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
27.10.2025 ( AL K A SARI N ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2025.10.28 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 11.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Oct 2025. The bench was K A SARI N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.