Om Kant v. Ajeev Kumar & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: VIKAS SURI Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Rajeev K. Kapila, Advocate for the petitioner. **** , J. (Oral)
Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside order dated 05.07.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dasuya, whereby the application for appointment of local commissioner to determine the period, age and nature of construction of the house constructed on the suit land, was dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute that the onus to prove the age of the construction rested upon the petitioner and his right to lead evidence has not been closed so far.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek alternative recourse, as available in law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. November 27, 2024 d.gulati (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No DIWAKER GULATI 2024.11.28 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Nov 2024. The bench was VIKAS SURI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.