VIJENDER SAINI @ BIJENDER & Anr. v. STATE OF HARYANA & Anr.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Dharamvir Singh, Advocate for Ms.Nidhi Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

By way of filing present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners have sought quashing of FIR No.750 dated 03.12.2024 under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 296 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 13(1)(r) and 13(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act, 1989 registered at Police Station Hansi City, District Hansi (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings on the basis of compromise dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure P-3). RENU RAWAT 2026.05.11 10.54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-35407-2025 2

This Court vide order dated 09.02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Additional Sessions Judge has submitted copy of report dated 06.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 has not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.