✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 14 Feb 2024

Jaswant Kaur & Ors. v. Joga Singh & Ors.

Fao No. 4442 of 2013ALKA SARIN4 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
14 Feb 2024
Bench
ALKA SARIN
Neutral citation
2024:PHHC:21074

Outcome

Allowed

In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. Accordingly, the reworked compensation is as under : Sr. No. Heads Compensation Awarded 1 Monthly Income Rs.5,000/- 2 Annual Income [Rs.5,000x12]=Rs.60,000/- 3 Deduction 1/4th [Rs.60,000-15,000]=Rs.45,000/- 4 Future Prospects - 40% [Rs.45,000+18,000]=Rs.63,000/- 5 Multiplier - 15 6 Loss of estate [Rs.63,000x15]=Rs.9,45,000/- Rs.18,000/- Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.15…
  • Para 1010. In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is allowed and the award passed by the Tribunal is modified accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

Judgment

Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Karan Singla, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the claimant- appellants aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala vide award dated 08.03.2013.

2.

Since the facts, as recorded in the impugned award passed by the Tribunal, are not in dispute, the same are not being reproduced herein for the sake of brevity.

3.

The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following compensation : Sr. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Heads Compensation Awarded Monthly Income Rs.5,000/- Annual Income [Rs.5,000x12]=Rs.60,000/- Deduction 1/4th [Rs.60,000-15,000]=Rs.45,000/- Multiplier - 15 [Rs.45,000x15]=Rs.6,75,000/- Funeral expenses Rs.5,000/- Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.15 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh FAO-4442-2013 (O&M) -2- 6 7 Love and affection Rs.5,000/- Total Compensation Rs.6,85,000/- Interest 8%

4.

Learned counsel for the appellants would contend that though the income of the deceased was rightly assessed as Rs.5,000/- per month and a multiplier of ‘15’ as well as a deduction of 1/4th was applied correctly, however, no addition has been made towards future prospects which ought to have been 40%. It is further the contention of the learned counsel that the amount awarded under the conventional heads as well as under the head ‘loss of consortium’ is also not as per the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In support of his contentions the learned counsel for the claimant-appellants has relied upon the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. [(2017) 16 SCC 680], Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. [(2018) 18 SCC 130] and N. Jayasree & Ors. vs. Cholamandalam M.S General Insurance Company Ltd. [2021(4) RCR (Civil) 642].

5.

Per contra, the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 has vehemently argued that sufficient amount has already been awarded as compensation in the present case and that there is no scope of any enhancement.

6.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.15 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh FAO-4442-2013 (O&M) -3-

7.

In the present case, the Tribunal has though rightly assessed the income of the deceased as Rs.5,000/- per month and also correctly applied a multiplier of ‘15’ as well as deduction of 1/4th, however, no addition has been made towards future prospects and hence as per the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra), 40% addition is made towards future prospects. Further, the amount awarded under the conventional heads and under the head ‘loss of consortium’ is not as per the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Pranay Sethi (supra), Magma General Insurance Company Limited (supra) and N. Jayasree (supra) and hence, the claimant-appellants would be entitled to Rs.18,000/- (Rs.15,000+20% increase) towards loss of estate and Rs.18,000/- (Rs.15,000+20% increase) towards funeral expenses and the claimant-appellants (widow, two children and parents of the deceased) would also be entitled to Rs.48,000/- each (Rs.40,000+20% increase) towards loss of consortium.

8.

Accordingly, the reworked compensation is as under : Sr. No. Heads Compensation Awarded 1 Monthly Income Rs.5,000/- 2 Annual Income [Rs.5,000x12]=Rs.60,000/- 3 Deduction 1/4th [Rs.60,000-15,000]=Rs.45,000/- 4 Future Prospects - 40% [Rs.45,000+18,000]=Rs.63,000/- 5 Multiplier - 15 6 Loss of estate [Rs.63,000x15]=Rs.9,45,000/- Rs.18,000/- Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.15 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh FAO-4442-2013 (O&M) -4- 7 Funeral expenses Rs.18,000/- 8 Loss of consortium (i) Parental (ii) Filial [Rs.48,000/-x2] = Rs.96,000/- [Rs.48,000/-x2] =Rs.96,000/- (iii) Spousal's Rs.48,000/- Total Compensation Rs.12,21,000/- (Total Rs.2,40,000/-)

9.

The amount in excess of and over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal shall also attract interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the entire amount. The amount shall be apportioned between the claimant-appellants as directed by the Tribunal.

Operative part

10.

In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is allowed and the award passed by the Tribunal is modified accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

14.02.2024 Yogesh Sharma NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE Yogesh Sharma 2024.02.15 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above discussion, the present appeal is allowed

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 14 Feb 2024. The bench was ALKA SARIN.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Fao No. 4442 of 2013). ← Search more judgments