✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 31 Oct 2012

Raman Walia v. Vijay Walia

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment and decree is set

Provisions considered

Judgment

Order

31.10.2012 Raman Walia ...Appellant Versus Vijay Walia ..Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: Mr. Gourav Goel, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The appellant-Raman Walia, has filed this appeal to challenge judgment and decree dated 07.01.2012, passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Jalandhar. Raman Walia, appellant and Smt. Vijay Walia, respondent, are present in Court along with their counsel. Smt. Vijay Walia states that she has resolved her differences with the appellant and they are residing together as husband and wife for the last six months. Vijay Walia-respondent, states that she has no objection, if the appeal, filed by her husband, is allowed, judgment and decree passed by the trial court is set aside and petition for grant of divorce is dismissed. F.A.O.No.M-31 of 2012 -2- We have heard counsel for the parties. The appeal has been filed against judgment and decree dated 07.01.2012, passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Jalandhar, dismissed the petition for grant of divorce, filed by the appellant-husband. During pendency of the appeal, parties were referred to Mediation. With the able assistance of mediators, parties have resolved their differences and as is apparent from the statements made before the mediators and in Court, today, are residing together as husband and wife for the last six months. The respondent has made a statement that she has no objection, if the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment and decree is set aside. In this view of the matter, we allow the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment and decree and dismiss the petition, file under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for grant of divorce. No order as to costs. (RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE October 31, 2012 (REKHA MITTAL) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment and decree is set

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 13.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 31 Oct 2012. The bench was RAJIVE BHALLA, REKHA MITTAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments