✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 06 Jul 2026

STATE OF HARYANA v. ALOK JAIN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Judgment

ALOK JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Labh Singh. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

#1. petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR The present petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR petition has been filed seeking the quashing of FIR No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 No.0208 dated 06.07.2022, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452 B of the IPC added and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120-B of the IPC added and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120 and 506 of the IPC, with Sections 325, 307 and 120 3 and 351 subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 333 and 351 subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 33 subsequently (corresponding to Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 33 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with Sections 117(2), 109 and 61(2) of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District of the BNS added subsequently), at Police Station Chhapar, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, Yamuna Nagar, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, including the charge-sheet (Annexures P-2 and P including the charge 3), on the basis of the 2 and P-3), on the basis of the 4) arrived at between the compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) arrived at between the compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P compromise dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure P parties.

#2. Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and CRM-M-35406 35406-2026 -2- of attorney, which is taken on record. filed power of attorney, which is taken on record. filed power

#3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the present petition is based on a partial compromise. the present petition is based on a partial compromise. the present petition is based on a partial compromise. 4 Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that an identical issue is pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court. identical issue is pending bef , however, ore the Hon'ble Apex Court. She, however, prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage, with liberty to file a fresh petition at an appropriate stage. a fresh petition at an appropriate stage.

#5. Learned counsel for Learned counsel for Learned counsel for the petitioners further prays the petitioners further prays the petitioners further prays down not to resile from the compromise. respondents No.2 and 3 be bound down not to resile from the compromise. down not to resile from the compromise. respondents No.2 and 3 be bound The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for The said factual position is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3. respondents No.2 and 3.

#6. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

#7. ade clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion ade clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. July 06, 2026 July 06, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- Whether Reportable: Yes/No Yes/No (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120, 307, 325, 506; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 33, 61(2), 109, 115(2), 117(2), 190, 191(3).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 Jul 2026. The bench was ALOK JAIN.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 35406 of 2026). ← Search more judgments