✦ High Court of India · 16 Jun 2026

CRM-M-33544 v. State of Punjab

Case Details High Court of India · 16 Jun 2026
Court
High Court of India
Case No.
CRM-M No. 33544 of 2026
Decided
16 Jun 2026
Length
1,256 words

DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. -.- DEEPAK GUPTA J. (Oral) DEEPAK GUPTA

1. petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of This is the first petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of This is the regular bail in case FIR No.47 dated 25.03.2026 regular bail in case FIR No. 109, 61(2) of BNS 25.03.2026, under Section 109, 61(2) of BNS B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act, (corresponding to Sections 307, 120-B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act (corresponding to Sections 307, 120 registered at Police Station Dera Baba Nanak, registered at Police Station Police District Batala, District Dera Baba Nanak, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur.

2. the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as The FIR was lodged on the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as The FIR was lodged per which on 25.03.2026 as he was moving on his motor per which on 25.03.2026 he was moving on his motor-cycle, two young persons , two young persons on cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa had fired a gun shot with cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa a motor-cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he the intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he accused Rupa alighted from the entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co-accused Rupa alighted from the entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co the accused fled away on the motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both the accused fled away on the motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both It is revealed further that during investigation it emerged that it was It is revealed further that during investigation it emerge motor-cycle. It is revealed further that during investigation it emerge cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the Amritjit Singh, who was riding the motor-cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the Amritjit Singh, who was riding the motor complainant. CRM-M-33544- -2026 (O&M) -2-

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel It is submitted by the l petitioner earned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the basis of the has been falsely implicated statement of the on the basis of the supplementary statement of the well of the only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube-well of the only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube complainant only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube petitioner and he was also involved therein. Learned couns petitioner and he was also involved therein el further contends that Learned counsel further contends that ; that the trial is likely to take long time to petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2026; that the trial is likely to take long time to ; that the trial is likely to take long time to petitioner is in custody conclude.

5. Notice of motion. Notice of motion. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. respondent – State.

6. Learned State counsel concedes to Learned Sta it is Rupa, who is the position that it is Rupa, who is named in the FIR to have fired the gun-shot and that the motor named in the FIR cycle used in the said shot and that the motor-cycle used in the said crime was driven by Amritjit Singh , as per the investigation and that name of the driven by Amritjit Singh, as per the investigation and that name of the , as per the investigation and that name of the petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement of the complainant. petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement of the complainant. No recovery had been effected from the present petitioner. recovery had been effected from the present petitioner. recovery had been effected from the present petitioner.

8. Heard. Heard. unsel, the As per custody certificate filed by the learned State counsel, the As per custody certificate filed by the learned State co As per custody certificate filed by the learned State co petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in any other case.

9. Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting to regular bail and he anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions.

10. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. June 16, 2026 tripti (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE speaking : Speaking Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether speaking/non : Yes/No : Yes/No Whether reportable Whether reportable

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments