11.202 .2025 Desh Raj and an nd another v. State of Haryan aryana & Ors.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK CORAM : HO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA HO EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI Present : Dr. Dr. Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate for the or the petitioners. ana. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL SIBAL, J. (Oral)

#1. Learned counsel for the petitioners su Lea submits that at this stage, he would b ould be satisfied if the p the present writ petition is disposed posed of with a direction to the Depu Deputy Commissioner, ner, Karnal-respondent No.2 a decision n application/repres representation dated 29.08.2023 (A (Annexure P-3), submitted by petitioners.

#2. Learned counsel for the respondents Lea dents, who appears on advance notice, h tice, has no objection if th n if the above prayer is accepted.

#3. Accordingly, at this stage, without co Acc out commenting on the merits of the cas the case, the writ petition i tition is disposed of with a direction to re to respondent No.2 to take a decision ision on the application/r ation/representation dated 29.08.2023 2023 (Annexure P-3) submitted by petitioners, by pa , by passing a speaking order and after g after granting opportunity of hearing to a ng to all affected parties a rties and in accordance with law, prefera referably within two months from the da the date of receipt of a co f a copy of this order.

#4. Needless to add that the decision Nee on so taken be communicated to th to the petitioners and if and if the decision is not to the satisfact tisfaction of the petitioners, they would b ould be at liberty to chall challenge the same, in accordance with e with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE

18.11.2025 Prince [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Whether speaking/reaso /reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2025.11.19 05:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document