Kaushalya Devi & Anr. v. Bachitar Singh & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 27 Sep 2012
- Bench
- M JEYAPAUL
Outcome
Withdrawn
are dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the claimants to seek
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 163
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the above, the appeal preferred by the claimants and the claim petition filed by them before the Tribunal are dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the claimants to seek relief under Section 163 of the Act ibid. September 27, 2012 Judge…
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL . . . PRESENT: - Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate, for the appellants. . . . M. Jeyapaul, J (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant- claimants seeks permission to withdraw the claim petition itself, filed before the Tribunal, with liberty to seek relief under Section 163 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Operative part
In view of the above, the appeal preferred by the claimants and the claim petition filed by them before the Tribunal are dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the claimants to seek relief under Section 163 of the Act ibid. September 27, 2012 Judge (M. Jeyapaul)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: are dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the claimants to seek
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 163.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Sep 2012. The bench was M JEYAPAUL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.