Lovepreet Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 Lovepreet Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others CRM-M-36822-2023 Date of Decision: 20.02.2024 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Rajnish K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 4 to take appropriate legal action against the private respondent No. 5 under the provisions of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, as he is guilty of solemnizing marriage with the petitioner at the age of 16 years against her wishes. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if direction is issued to respondent No. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to consider and take a final decision on representation dated 17.05.2023 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioner, in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that he has no objection in case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is accepted. RISHU KATARIA 2024.02.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going CRM-M-36822-2023 -2- into the merits of the present petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, to forthwith consider the grievance(s) raised by the petitioner in the aforesaid representation and take action thereupon as he deems fit, in accordance with law, within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
20.02.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.02.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 20 Feb 2024. The bench was NIDHI GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.