CRWP No. 6173 of 2025 · Punjab & Haryana High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Luvinder Sofat, Sr. DAG, Punjab assisted by ASI Balwant Singh. **** KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus seeking directions upon the official respondents to get released his daughter, namely Simran from the illegal detention of respondents No. 4 and 5.
In compliance of the order dated 9.6.2025 passed by this Court, the learned State counsel has filed status report by way of affidavit of Superintendent of Police (CAW&C) in Officiating Charge of Sub Division, Sri Muktsar Sahib, which is taken on record.
In the said status report, it has been averred that the police has inquired into the allegations levelled by the petitioner and found that detenue Simran is aged 19 years. The detenue has performed marriage with Sanjay Kumar (respondent No. 4) on 31.5.2025 and been residing happily with him. It is further echoed therein that the detenue has also suffered her statement to Gurpreet Singh 2025.06.13 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh the effect that she has got married with the said respondent with her own CRWP-6173-2025 -2- volition and without the consent of her parents. In addition, it is averred in the status report (supra) that given the apprehension of danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of the parents of detenue Simran, they also preferred a petition seeking protection of their lives and liberty bearing CRWP No. 5973 of 2025, which has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated
5.6.2025.
Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE June 13, 2025 Gurpreet Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No Gurpreet Singh 2025.06.13 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 13 Jun 2025. The bench was KIRTI SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.