DIVIK CHHABRA v. M/S INDIA INFOLINE HOUSING FINANCE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ss. 138, 141, 142
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 200
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Judgment
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate and Mr. Vibhor Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate and Mr. Rajpal, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) , J.(ORAL
#1. As the petitioner has been acquitted, the present petition seeking quashing of complaint bearing NACT No.3903 dated 27.02.2018 under Sections 138/141/142 of NI Act r/w Section 200 Cr.P.C. and summoning order dated 09.04.2018 has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
#2. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
14.07.2026 Kusum (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — ss. 138, 141, 142; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 200.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 14 Jul 2026. The bench was JASJIT SINGH BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.