STATE OF HARYANA & Ors. v. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. hereby…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH .....RESPONDENTS .....RESPONDENT Present: , Advocate for Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana SURYA PARTA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) been filed by the petitioner The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner s to consider the representation dated directions to the official respondents to consider the representation dated s to consider the representation dated directions to
02.06.2025. 02.06.2025.
#2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the sel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner r has filed the representation dated dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P (Annexure P-1) earned counsel prays for directions to the earned counsel prays for directions to before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to before the respondent No. respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner respondent No. representation of the petitioner within within the stipulated time. stipulated time.
#3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to to respondents No.1 to 3. CRM-M-31198 31198-2026 (O&M) 8587 2 Chauhan, AAG Haryana Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana upon the Hence service of notice upon the is hereby dispensed with. State is hereby dispensed with.
#5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. hereby disposed of with a direction to to decide the the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P representation of the by passing a speaking order (Annexure P-1) by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It from the date of receipt of copy of instant order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order within a period of is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of titioner, and take an independent decision at his own representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own titioner, and take an independent decision at his own representation level. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whether reportable :Yes/No :Yes/No : Yes/No : Yes/No
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.