✦ High Court of India

Daljeet @ Jaljeet Daljeet @ Jaljeet v. State of Haryana & others State of Haryana & others

Case Details

CRWP-6876 6876-2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 6876-2024 (O&M) CRWP-6876 Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 Date of Decision: Daljeet @ Jaljeet Daljeet @ Jaljeet …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others State of Haryana & others ...Respondents

Legal Reasoning

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Sheenu Sura, DAG, Haryana. GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. 1. Learned State counsel has filed a short reply by way of an affidavit of earned State counsel has filed a short reply by way of an affidavit of earned State counsel has filed a short reply by way of an affidavit of earned State counsel has filed a short reply by way of an affidavit of ct Jail, Jhajjar, which is taken on Mr.Amit, Deputy Superintendent, District Jail, Jhajjar, which is taken on ct Jail, Jhajjar, which is taken on Mr.Amit, Deputy record. A perusal of the said reply reveals that the applicant/petitioner has record. A perusal of the said reply reveals that the applicant/petitioner has record. A perusal of the said reply reveals that the applicant/petitioner has record. A perusal of the said reply reveals that the applicant/petitioner has remained involved in a large number of cases though he stands acquitted in remained involved in a large number of cases though he stands acquitted in remained involved in a large number of cases though he stands acquitted in remained involved in a large number of cases though he stands acquitted in a majority of such cases. As per said repl a majority of such cases ant has been provided ly, the applicant has been provided requisite medical treatment. The concluding paragraph from the medical requisite medical treatment. The concluding paragraph from the medical requisite medical treatment. The concluding paragraph from the medical requisite medical treatment. The concluding paragraph from the medical report annexed with the reply as Annexure R-1 is reproduced hereinunder: report annexed with the reply as Annexure R report annexed with the reply as Annexure R “It is further submitted that the patient is on treatment as prescribed “It is further submitted that the patient is on treatment as prescribed “It is further submitted that the patient is on treatment as prescribed “It is further submitted that the patient is on treatment as prescribed nd all the prescribed medicines are being by PGIMS, Rohtak and all the prescribed medicines are being nd all the prescribed medicines are being by PGIMS, Rohtak a provided by the Jail Hospital, Patient CT Scan was done at PGIMS, provided by the Jail Hospital, Patient CT Scan was done at PGIMS, provided by the Jail Hospital, Patient CT Scan was done at PGIMS, provided by the Jail Hospital, Patient CT Scan was done at PGIMS, Rohtak on 08.05.2025 (CT ANGIO B/L) with abdominal aorta and Rohtak on 08.05.2025 (CT ANGIO B/L) with abdominal aorta and Rohtak on 08.05.2025 (CT ANGIO B/L) with abdominal aorta and Rohtak on 08.05.2025 (CT ANGIO B/L) with abdominal aorta and Patient is known case of lumbar report yet to be collected. Patient is known case of lumbar Patient is known case of lumbar report yet to be collected. tient was advised physiotherapy in GH, radiculopathy for which patient was advised physiotherapy in GH, tient was advised physiotherapy in GH, radiculopathy for which pa VIMAL KUMAR 2025.08.29 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6876 6876-2024 (O&M) 2 Jhajjar, but the modality for the physiotherapy is not available in Jhajjar, but the modality for the physiotherapy is not available in Jhajjar, but the modality for the physiotherapy is not available in Jhajjar, but the modality for the physiotherapy is not available in . As the patient was functional condition at Civil Hospital, Jhajjar. As the patient was functional condition at Civil Hospital, Jhajjar functional condition at Civil Hospital, Jhajjar ronic operated for haemorrhoids and on examination – healed chronic operated for haemorrhoids and on examination operated for haemorrhoids and on examination fissure at 12.00 o’clock position for which the patient advised to fissure at 12.00 o’clock position for which the patient advised to fissure at 12.00 o’clock position for which the patient advised to fissure at 12.00 o’clock position for which the patient advised to avoid prolonged sitting so the patient can’t be referred for PGIMS, avoid prolonged sitting so the patient can’t be referred for PGIMS, avoid prolonged sitting so the patient can’t be referred for PGIMS, avoid prolonged sitting so the patient can’t be referred for PGIMS, Rohtak for physiotherapy. Patient is being provided symptomatic Rohtak for physiotherapy. Patient is being provided symptomatic Rohtak for physiotherapy. Patient is being provided symptomatic Rohtak for physiotherapy. Patient is being provided symptomatic lieved. (All treatment for pain but patient is not symptomatically relieved. (All treatment for pain but patient is not symptomatically re treatment for pain but patient is not symptomatically re OPD and referral records are attached herewith)” OPD and referral records are attached herewith)” OPD and referral records are attached herewith)” A perusal of the aforesaid extract from the medical report shows that the 2. A perusal of the aforesaid extract from the medical report shows that the A perusal of the aforesaid extract from the medical report shows that the A perusal of the aforesaid extract from the medical report shows that the applicant/petitioner has been advised physiotherapy. applicant/petitioner has been advised physiotherapy. applicant/petitioner has been advised physiotherapy. 3. y sufficient ground to In view of the aforestated position, we do not find any sufficient ground to In view of the aforestated position, we do not find an In view of the aforestated position, we do not find an grant parole to the applicant/petitioner. The petition is accordingly grant parole to the applicant/petitioner. The petition is accordingly grant parole to the applicant/petitioner. The petition is accordingly grant parole to the applicant/petitioner. The petition is accordingly dismissed. dismissed.

Decision

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. However, the Jail Authorities are directed to ensure that the medical 5. However, the Jail Authorities are directed to ensure that the medical However, the Jail Authorities are directed to ensure that the medical However, the Jail Authorities are directed to ensure that the medical equired, is made available to the applicant/petitioner treatment, as may be required, is made available to the applicant/petitioner equired, is made available to the applicant/petitioner treatment, as may be r including physiotherapy. In case, it is not convenient to take the including physiotherapy. In case, it is not convenient to take the including physiotherapy. In case, it is not convenient to take the including physiotherapy. In case, it is not convenient to take the applicant/petitioner to the Hospital for physiotherapy, then necessary applicant/petitioner to the Hospital for physiotherapy, then necessary applicant/petitioner to the Hospital for physiotherapy, then necessary applicant/petitioner to the Hospital for physiotherapy, then necessary e jail arrangement for providing physiotherapy be made available in the jail arrangement for providing physiotherapy be made available in th arrangement for providing physiotherapy be made available in th premises itself. premises itself. GURVINDER SINGH GILL) (GURVINDER SINGH GILL JUDGE 27.08.2025 27.08.2025 Vimal (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No VIMAL KUMAR 2025.08.29 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments