Madan Lal v. Criminal Misc. No. M-30380 of 2026
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the petitioner, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of above mentioned statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 02, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Judgment
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Rose Gupta and Ms. Neha Anand Mahajan, Advocates for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. Mr. Aditya Sanghi and Mr. Pradeep Bhardwaj, Advocates for the complainant. Surya Partap Singh, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
Operative part
In view of above mentioned statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 02, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petitioner, the present petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 02 Jul 2026. The bench was ADVOCATES, SURYA PARTAP SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.