I N THE HI GH v. Bachan

favour of defendantNo ant l lhc Will dat ed 281999 execut ed in favour defendantNo l by Dwarki l levi deceased Plaint iff has also sought relief of perm anentinj unct ioilrcst rainingt he defendantNos and 5 t o 8 t he suit properlyand rest rainingdefendant No l or m akingany sort 01alt crat ionor m odificat ionin t he E from m akinganykind of in t he propert yD and also from propert y The in t lle I lil possession of t he plaint iffover t he fact s of t hecase wlleil put in brief are t hat plaint iffbeing originalresident of villageClllarllllll Palt l DuggonTehsil Kharar and 1S present lyresidingat Dubai t hercflI re appoint edhis fat her4n4awJaswant Singhon 129988 as his gencralat t clrneyJaswant Singhhas Oled t hc suit on behalfoft he I t has beenaverred in t llc j 1laintt hat Puran Singhhad t hrce sons nam elyBalj it Singh olaint iffl I lachan Siungh lefendant Nol1 BhupinderSinglieceasedland oile daught ernam elyBachan Kaur alias Gurm it Kaur Sm t Dwarki lOevi was t he wife of Puran Singh The plaint iffand defendant No alongwit h above said persons were Hindus and t herefore governedI I y I lindu Law Defendant No43achan Singhseparat edin t he life t im e t I f his I lit herPuran Singh111t he year 1976 Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 351 T W4 RSA No3852 of 2008 3 aft erget t inga house boundedas uilt lcr East West Nort h Sout h Houseof BiI nlaSingh GurdwaraSallib House of House 01 lliinla Singhand Singh Household goodscash and ornam ent s and since t hen enj oyedt his propert yin lit I m ot her m em bersof t he Joint Fam ily DefendantNol Bachan Singhiit lm illedhis from ot her m em bers ofJoint Hindu Fam ilyin his st at enlentdat ed 810979 Sm t Bachan Kaur alias Gurm it Kaur had been m arriedand lived in her m at rim onialhouse at villageDholewal Tehsil Sam ralaaild has died leavingbehind defendant Nos2 Puran SinghalongwI lh his lwo sons Balj itSinghoolaint ifo and 3 BhupinderSingh aild Dwarki Devi oeingwife9 form ed a Joint Hindu Falnilyand Puian Singhwas t heKart a oft he Fam ily 1 C 0 I I Z 0 I c2j Puran Singhhad t hreehousesand 011e raui fullydet ailed in t he headnot e of t heplaintand one houseinent iollecliil para No3 ofplaintin which Bachan Singh defendantNo Afler t he deat h of Puran Singh Z plaint iffBalj itSinghwas in of t wo housesand one Taur in disput eand at presenlis in ofone houseie properlyF I t has furt her been averret l lhat Puran Singhand his t wo sons were m asons and were workingas Carllent crand Blacksm it h in t hevillage Marauli Khurd and Gharuan and llicir iilcolne was pooledand form ed Joint Hindu Fam ilyfunds which run llllll Illousandsof rupees The suit land sit uat edin villageMarauli Khurd and iii villageGharuan was I ll 1978 in t he nam e of BhupindeiSinglIdeceasedand Sm t Dwarki Devi deceasedm em ber of Joint Hindu Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Marauli Kalan was also acquiredI il The land sit uat ed lll village JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Illc ilam e Sm t Dwarki Dcvi 352 r 1 RSA No3852 of 2008 1 l 4 1 0 0 C5 I Z f I 08 4 3 Z Ll deceasedwit h t he aid of Joinl l lindu Fam ilyfunds and as such form ed Joint Hindu FalnilyproperlyThe said were not for t he sole benefitof BhupinderSinghand Sm lwarki Devivdeceasedand t he sam e were held as t rust ees for t he benelitof lnem bersof t he Joint Hindu Fam ily Sm t Dwarki Devi deceasedwas 1111illit erat e and unskilled housewife havingno source of illlCOllle The t aur ie propert yD andt he houses ie propert y E and 12 WClt l also ancest ral Joint Hindu Fam ily 1eC obt ainedbyPuran Singllfronl his fat her One room in t he house const rucled ollt 01 I hc fundsof Joint Hindu Fam ilyof E was Puran Singhafler t he of I laclliinSinghdefendant lt has furt herbcen avciTedI llat Singhwas m urdered at t he handsof Bachan SinghdefefidantNo 1 on t he nightof 7 and 8 Oct ober 1979 who was issuelessand I cll Kaur defendantNoAl as his widow who renunciat ed hcr int ercst 111 t lle Joint Hindu Fam ily held in t henam e SiiI ghdeceasedt hrougha consent decreedat ed2 0Ol1981 relat ingt o land sit ut it edin village favourofDwarki Devi a m em berc1fJcliiitI I induFam ilyHat iinderKaur also renunciat edher int erestlll Joint I lindli 17ainilypropert iessit uat ed at villageMarauli Khurd and got sanct iot lcd t llc m ut at ion N03396 dat ed 29031982 in favourof Dwarki Devi dcccasedAfler renunciat ion shegot rem arried lt has furt herbeen pleadedt hiI t I lachanSinghdefendantwas againstin Sessions Case N039 0 24 2 979 under Sect ion 302134JPC for t he m urder of BhupinderSingllbut was acquit t edof t he Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh chargesheetafler givingbenefitofdoubt JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 353 I e RSA No3852 of 2008 5 1 C14 D 0 Z Z I 021 a9 Z Qm Puran SinghKart il rI l Jt lint I I indu Fam ilydied on 07 11 1982 Wit hout any part it ion111t oI I cJoint Hindu Fam ily I ll and wit hout execul ingt I ily Wl l1 in favour of Dwarki Devi Shrim at iDwarki Devi also died Oll 0207 1989 wit hout affect ingany t he said l indu Hindu loillily propert ylt l t he plaint iffbeingt hc sole survivingm em berof t he Joint I indu Fam ilybecam et he exclusivc and ilhsolut eowner of t he ent ireJoint Hindu Fam ilypropert yin quest ion Takingundue of t he rcvenueent riesin her nam e and of t he flduciary t he posillt I ilI t lwards plaint iffDwarki Devi sold t he land 3 kanals 18 m arlas sit ued at villageMaruali Khurd ie propert yB in favour of Piara Singhdefendant No vide saledeeddat ed 1509986 111cpliI int iffat t hat t im e was living abroad and in t he absence I wiirki Devi deceasedact ed as t he Managerand senI Or m em berof Joinl llindu Fam ilyDwarki Devi deceased was not t he absolut eowner of any properlyor speciflcshareas a result of part it iont i I l her deat h in t lle Jt I illt I lindu Fam ilypropert yit l quest ionand as such was not coinpet entt o scll t lle said 3 kanals 18 m arlas of t he suit land vide sale deed dat ed 15091 986 in favour of Piara Singh defendant NoMoreovershe had 110 I egalnecessit yt o sell t he said land The sale is also vit iat edbeingwit houtconsidenit it iland beingnot for t he benet ltoft he Joint HinduI 2am ilyand 1S I iablet o hc sct asidebeingfalseand fabricat ed 10 Sm t Dwarki Devi deceased was llol colllpet entt o execut e t he Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh WI LL dat ed 28031989 allegedbydefendailt 43t ichail Siilghin his favour JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 354 r RSA No3852 of 2008 6 1 1 0 0 0 Z r I c m m Z Ll andas she had not becoineI llc t lllsolut eowner of any specificshareas a result of part it ionMoreover slle ivas not t he owner of t he Taur andhouse at all The Singhhad from his in t he year 1976 andhild ncver servedor lookedaft er his fat her and Sm t Dwarki Devi deceased l3ocilun Singhhad acut e st rainedrclat ions wit h Sm t Dwarki Devi deceiI sedon account of m urderof singh who was livingwit h Sm l lOwarki Devi deceased I lence Sm t Dwarki Devi execuled t iny WI LL and t he sam e is false fabricat edinvalid forgedunconsciollilbledocut nentand is sunoundedby highly circum st ancesand is I iable t o be set aside Sm t Dwarki Devi was livingwit h t he his fam ilywho were lookingaft er her andwere servingher 12 Plaint ifffiled a civil suit No1409dat ed133 1989 t it ledas Balj it Singhvs Bachan Singhand ot hersiil t hc llllrt of SeniorSub JudgeRopar which was allowedt o be wit hdrawnwit h t o inst it ut e a new sult subj ectt o cost s of Rs51 vide orderdalet l 21 11 1990 and t he said cost s of Rs51 havebeen vide RD No I 8 dat ed l 1991 On not ice defendant Nos 1 ancl 5 Oled t heir j oint writ t en st at eI nent and raised illt er alia t hat t he suit is not inaint ainableand t hat t he suit is t im e barred I t has beenallegedt hat BaUit Singhnever appoint edhis fat herl4aw 118 his at t orncyvide power of at t om eydat ed 1 91 988 The plaint iffis cst t lppcdby his own act and conductt o file t he presentsuit because lhe plt I int iffhad been adm it t ing DwarkiDcvi t o be t he owner oft he suit prollerly When t he plaint iffle for Dubaiint he year 19 84 t hereaft er his wifeJasvirKaur alongwit h children Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 355 I RSA No3852 of 2008 l 7 U are livingin her parent alhouse iit villageRangianand also she cam e t o villageGharuanaft ert he inst ilut ionof llle presentsuit The ancest ors oft he plaint iffand defendant No l and so I llc I olaint iffand defendantNo class and are hycust om aryI aw Puran Singhhad 1 inadea fam ilysct t lem ent on 10121977 undhasgivent he t wo vacant sit es t o defendantNo 1 det ailedt hereof is as I illlows 0 0 I C5 I e 2 2 0 ot j wm o Z I l East West Nort h Sout h Houseof Purall Rlllll CI C Vacantsit e of Ballt ii Singh House of Bant a SilI ghPuran Singhet c and Dharam shala andanot herpropert yowncdbyhiin and boundedas East West Nort h Sout h Rast a Vacant sit e of Gali Shareeamand Houseof Bhura Ralll t lhuro Raln sit uat edin t he area ofvillageGllt iruan The abovesaid t wo vacant sit cs I it id beengivenbyPuran Singh t o defendantNo l and t heancest ralhouscplicca const ruct edone was given t o Puran Singhfat herof plaint iffand defendant Nol died in t he year 1981 and has not from defendantNo 1 rat her t heyhad beeil livingt oget herand it was only dcfendantNo who had beenworkingand I lat lbcen earningPlaint iffwas m arriedin t he year l982 aft er t he deat h t ll Plt rail SinghTlle wife oft he plaint iffaft er a periodof SlX nlont hs could 11111pull Oll wit h t he fam ily t herefore accordingt o t he fainily set t lenlclll nlude by Puran Singh t he ofancest ral housewas givellt o plainlill Owarka Devi had com e andj oinedwit h defendantNo l as Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Singhalreadydied in t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document year 1979 Defendant No I has not froill lhe fam ilyas allegedby 356 U RSA No3852 of 2008 8 1 1 1 0 r C5 I 08 7 Z t lle No I was t he t lnlyearninghand andt hereforeaRer t hem arriageofplaint ifft hedcfendiinlNoI alongwit h his m ot herst art edt o live in t he house const ruct edby deleilt lant No l which was a I t has been furt herailcgedt lI iilDwarki Devi duringher lifet im e sold t he I and in favourof Piara Singllond earliert o t hat she had t hesaine wit h Piara Singhand even llle Dwarki Devi t o be t he owner oft he landin disput elOefendantNo t lle propert ywit h considerat ionand is o l1t lnafide purchaserof t he sam e Singhieceasedl t hc propert ybyhis own incom eand t hc propert ywas self acquiredpropcrly 01 said Singhand inherit edfroln him by Dwarki Devi and slic was cot npet entt o execut e a Willclat ed 28 3 19 89 and she execut edt he St lllle wit h her free consent 111 favourofdefendantNo1 The plaint iffhild lllc oft he said Will and has adm it t edt he sam e beforeAsst st iinl Collect or lst Grade and also flled an t hroughhis counsel Thc I llaint iffwas not havinggood relat ionswit h Dwarki Devi and he aild I lis v never servedDwarki Devi and rat hert he lit igat ionwit h lOlilarki Devi in her life t im e DefendantNo has also filed count er claim for m akingt he part it ionoft he housewhich 1S I n ofllI e 17 as defendantNo had g0t 112share 111t he said I louse and t heplaint iffhas given t hc wrong boundariest hereofand t he propert yis boundedas under East West Nort h Sout h Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Rast a Share am Houseof Bant aSingh Huse ofCharan Singlland House of Am ar Singh r JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and 1 integrity of this document 357 t r Tz RSA No852 of 2008 Pe l0 9 l I n t he aforesaid prt I pcrt ydefendantNol is in hasconst ruct edone room also in t hc said propert yand t he plaint iffhasgot only1 shareand t his propcrt yis subj ectt o t he part it ionPuran Ram son of KirpaRam m adea fam ilyset t lcm enl011 1021977 as det ailedabove Aft cr t he cleat h of BhupinderSingh I lis slI are uponDwarki Devi t herefore she becam et hc owncr of 8 share in t he ancest ral house in of t he plaint iffis havingY sharein t he saidhouse Denyingot her averm ent s defendanlNo I prayedfor dism issaloft he suit DefendantNos2 and 3 I ll t llcir writ t en st at em ent averred t hat defendantNol Bachan SinghusedI it l I t ve since his fat herPuran Singhwas alive and t hereforehe was nt lt 11m em berof Joint Hindu Fam ily Bachan Singhfell in bad societ yand harillycarned and t hereforePuran Singhwas com pclledt o separat eBacllan Siilghsoon aft er his m arriage Denyingot her averm ent s t heyprayedlor dism issaloft he suit I n replicat ionplaint iOreit crat cllI llc claim of t he plaintand cont rovert edt hat of t hewrit t en st at einent Followingissueswere am cd 1 0 C C5 I 4 Z r I 08 3 Z 1 Whet herPuran Singhalongwilll his t wo sons Balj itSingh Singhand St nt Dwarki Devi form edJoint Hindu Fam ilyas ailegedin ParaNoA0oft he plaint20PP 2 Whet her Bachan Singhdefcndanthad fam ilyin t he year1976as allegcdI ll para No OPP from t he oft he plaint2 3 Whet her t be suit I and sit uat edin vlliageMarauli Khurd and in 1978 out of Marauli Kalan and Gharuanwas Joint Hindu Fam ilyfund as allegcdin para No6 oft he plaint 20PP Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 4 Whet hert hepI aint iffis ent it lledlo sliecced t o t he suit I andon t he deat h of Sm t lOwarki Devi beinj lsole survivingm em ber I oart iNo10 of t he plainte of t he j ointfam ilyas allegedlll JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 358 0 RSA No3852 of 2008 10 P r 0 C I Z L2f C c8 Z Llm OPP 5e Whet hersale deedt lilt cd 1591986 is illegalnull and void as allegedin Para No12 of t he plaintand Sm t DwarkiDevi wasnot com pet entt o sell I llesam e 2OPP 6 Whet her Sm t lOwarkiI Oevi was not com pet entt o execut e any WI LL as allegediil PariINl13 oft he plaint20PP 7 Whet her Sint Dwarki Devi execut ed valid WI LL dat ed 1989 and cancellet lp1riousWI LL dat ed2831984 I f 28 so it s effect90P10 8 Whet her defendanl NosfI I t I B are in illegal t he suit I and 20PP 9 Whet herBalj itSinghhas nol Jaswant Singhas his vide deed dat ed129 I 988 20PD 10Whet hert hesuit is not m ainlaiilallle90PD 11Whet her suit is barredbyt iinc 21141 12Whet herplaint iffis st oppcdhy his act and conduct t o file t he presentsuit 20PP int erest in 13Whet her defendantNo house m ent ionedin para No F of t he I leadingof t he plaintand his count er claim in t his regardis m ailllaiilable20PD has any rightt it le or 134A Whet her t he plaint iffis enlilled I t l I he suit propert y2OPP oft he 14 Relief Bot h t he part ieshave I ed t heir rcspect iveevidence on t he aforesaidissues Aft er perusalof t he evidence and heoringt he I earnedcounsel for t hepart iest he I eam edt rial Court part lydecrecdt lle suif oft he plaint iff and decree dat eddat ed312005 Feelingdissat isfied wit h t he j udgm elllilnd decree dat ed 32005 t he Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh preferredappealbellI rc t he First Appellat e JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court The said appealwas heard and dism issed hy Ms I larpreetKaur 359 r hT RSA No3852 of 2008 RandhawaAddit ionalDist rictJudgeRupnagor Feelingdissat isfiedwit h t he and decree dat ed 232008 by Ms HarpreetKaur Rt lndhawa Addit ional Dist rict JudgeRupnagar secondappeal t he presentregular 1 have heard learned counsel ft lr llle part iesand have gone t hrought he records oft he case wit h t heir hclp 0 di4 The learned counsel for t he apj ocl I iillt has subm it t ed paraNo8 of t he groundsof appealfollowingsullslat lt ial havearisen for l aI Whet hert heCourt s below I lovc crrcd on fact sand in law in not by t he a clear iind adm ission his I lt iving t he j oint fam ilyas per his OWll sllt lwingwhich fact 1S agalll provedbyt he of wit nessesexaininedby t he hiinsclf as I 1Wlnd DH7 6bl Whet her t he SUlt I ands lly t he j oint fam ily funds in t he nam e of a part icularm elllbcrof t he fam ily would exclusivelybelongt o SUCI II llClllber only or would be a j oint fam ilypropert y lll t he nam e of a m einber t he fat nily wlluld exclusively belongt o such inem ber only Or t t Hlt luld be a j oint fam ilypropert ywit h t he right slit le t lt ld inlerest t herein r 0 C I C5 I Z 2 1 I 08 o Z Qa Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh acquiringsuch propert y2 lI l t hc ot her m einbers who act ivelyct lnt ribut ed ln JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t 0 C C5 I Z r e 05 V Z I l 360 r D RSA No3852 of 2008 12 1 c l Whet hert he Will dat cd283 11189allegedlyexecut edby Dwarki Devi is shrouded iI l num erous suspict ous whicll fhe Cclt irls bclow have not referred t o and consideredldiscussedand I llus inat erialdocum ent s and vit al evidence have lleell ignoredresult ingin ofj ust ice9 Whet hert he Court s below I lI lvceilt ert ainedt he Count er claim of proper Nol illcgt I llyand ignoringt he cont ainedin t lle t PC for t he filingof count er claim sand have t hus cI I m illilledgrave illegalit y I ll t his behalf 2 e l Whet hert he Court s below I lave ignoredt he evidence led byt he part iesand have rat her t reat ed int o t lle realmof and surillises and t ht is t he are erroneous and perversc11 The flrst at lack of t he I eam edcounsel loi respectof t he t hat Bachan SinghdefendantWt lS 1S in t hej ointfam ilyin t heyear 1979and was givena separiit epropert y Bachan Slnghwhile as his own wit ness has adm illed t hat t here was of t he Joint Hindu fam ilyPropert ySo t hc lllldiilgof bot h t he Court s beloware cont raryt o t he adm ission lnade byBachaI i Singhand 1S liable t o be ignored Darlbara SinglOW21 and Prit am SinglOM have also adm it t ed t he fact t hat Bachan Singhwas l rom t he fam ilySo he has no rightt o inherit t hesuit propert y Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 361 Y RSA No3852 of 2008 J 13 1 11C 0 0 I C5 I Z 0 I 08 7 Z I have carefullyconsideredt hc soid subinissionbut do not find anyforce111t hatsubm ission Thereis concurrent findingof fiI ct recordedbybot ht he Court s below t hat plaint iffhas failed t o prove t hat llacllan Singllwas from t hej ointHindu fam ilyOt herwiscalso t hc said aspect of t he case loosesit s as bot h t he Court sbcllllv I love givena concurrent flndingoffact t hat plaint iffhasfailed t o provct llal propelliesm ent ionedin t heheadingoft he plaintisj ointHindu fainilycopiirccnarypropert y Lcarned counsel for t he has furt hersubm it t edt hat m ent ionedat Sr No A t o C was it l lohenam e of Dwarki or BhupinderSinghout of t he j ointfam ilyfunds Bot h t he Court s below havecom m it t edeiror t he fact t hat a in t he nam e of all t he lncm bers of t he j ointHindu fam ilyOlll of t hej ointHindu funds ls a coparcenary So t he I cariledt rial Court has wronglyheldt hatpropert ym ent ionedat Sr No A l3 and C is t he propert y of Dwarki and t hatpropert ym ent ionedat Sr No l t o l lt l t lle headingof t he held byPuran Singh I havecareilly consideredt he said subm issit I llbut do not find anyforcein t hat subm ission There is concurrent findingof fact recordcdby hot h t he Court s below t hat t he plaint iffhas failed t o prove t hat any of t he propert yis t he j oint Hindu fam ilycoparcenary propert y The I eainecl t riol Court has t J3b t observedt hatt hereis dist inct ionhavinga j ointI vlindufaI nilyt han t he propert yheld byj ointHindu faI nilypropert yTherc illay bc a j oint Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1I indufam ilybut t he propert ycan be said t o be coparcenaryt lnlyif t he saine JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 362 r RSA N 3852 of 2008 14 1 C 0 C I C5 Z 2 0 Cr I 08 00 a Z Ll is anccst ralor out oft he ilucleus I llointHindu fam ilypropeny Leam edcounsel for t he could not poilllout t hat t here was any nucleust o t he propert yout of t lle und of j ointHindu fam ily propert The ot her at t ack of t he I earnedcolinsel for t he 1S ln respectof Will dat ed 2831989 execut edbyI Owiirkiin favour of defendant Bachan Singhand I earnedcounsel for t he hassublniuedt hat t he said Will in favour of Bachan SinghI S surroundedby SUSplClOUS circum st ances The t hum b ilnpressionon t he Wi I l is blurred Therewas t he Will in favt llir 11f 13achanSinght o t he exclusionof t he plaint iff The earlier Will of 11184was in favour of t he plaint iffas well as Bachan SinghThere I S I lll evidenceon t he Ole t hat m isbehavedwit h his fat herPuriin Sit lgh So t herecit alm ade t he Will t llat Will of 1989 is wrong on t he ace 01 it as t he gonet o t heDubai 1 have carefullyconsideredt he said sullt nissionbut do not flnd anyforce in t hatsubm ission There is concurrent findingof fact rccordedby bot h t he Court s bcllowt hat Will execut ed by Dwarki in favour t ll I 3achanSinghst ands provedbeyondshadowof doubt That beinga CllllClllTCllt findingof fact cannot be int erferred The case of t he plaint iflhiillself is t hat he went abroad So t herewas no occasloll for Dwarki Dcvi I o cllanget he Will favour of Bachan Singh who had been scrvingher duringher life t lm eUm a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 363 r RSA N 3852 of 2008 m 1 0 I Z 2 I 021 m m n Z I earned counsel for t he appellailt hiis I iiit her at t acked t he of bot h t he Court s below on t he grolillt lllllat count erclaim of No l have been 11legallyent erlainecl he Cout t below should not have cnt ert ained count er claim by t he No1 BachanSingh 1 have carefullyconsideredt hc said sulm ission but do not Ond anyforce in t hat subm ission Learned counselfor t he appellantct I t ild t lt I t show as t o how t he count erclailn was not m aint ainable The I astat t ackm ade byt he cllunsel I or I hc is t o t he effect t hat bot h t he Court s below have ignoredt lle evidenceled by t he part iesand havedecided t he case on 0i141surm isesand in t hese circum st anceshave ret urnedt heperverseOndings I have carefulI yconsideredt he said slilliilission but do not flnd anyforcein t hat subm ission The t rial Court has cacll ond every evidence as well as oral evidence Thc First Appcllat eCourt has re t he evidence There lS not hingOll t he I lle t hat decrees of bot h t he Court s below are t he reslill of t he evidenceon t he Ole No point cdat t cnt ion of m ine has been drawn t hat which oft he evidence has been ignorcdbybot h t he Court s below There is not hingon t he t ile t o show I llat iidgm ent sof bot h t he Court s below are basedon and surillises So it cannot be said t hatt hej udginent sof bot h t he Court s below arc j lervcrsc Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 364 r 1 RSA No3852 of 2008 16 I n view oft he abovediscussion011t he subst ant ial law raised above byt he I earnedcounscl Ioi t he appellant st andanswered againstt he st andsdism issed t he appealis wi t hout any m erit and t he sam e A copy of t his be scnt 10 t he t rial Court for st rict 914 2010 Sv 1 JUDGE 1 1 0 0 I I Z 2 I 021 m m Z P Ol 1 1 r1 lC 69v4 1V eI i A0 el 8 10 I o Um a 13: 13 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document