Kailash Giri v. Gram Panchayat
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL ...RESPONDENTS Present: Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)
#1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the Court to decide his application (CM-92-2025) under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC, titled as ‘Kailash Giri Vs. Gram Panchayat’ expeditiously. Admittedly, the same was filed in the year 2025 and the suit from which it arose is also pending before the Court.
#2. In view of the facts and material placed before this Court, it would be appropriate to direct the trial Court to decide the suit as well as the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC expeditiously as early as possible keeping in view the pendency before it in accordance with law.
#3. Disposed of accordingly. CR-4525-2026 ` -2-
#4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
27.05.2026 (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 May 2026. The bench was PARMOD GOYAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.