CRM-M No. 33858 of 2024 · Punjab And Haryana Chandigarh High Court · 2024
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 25
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Anand Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anand Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anand Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA **** By way of present petition filed under Section 439 read with By way of present petition filed under Section 439 read with By way of present petition filed under Section 439 read with By way of present petition filed under Section 439 read with ection to Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for issuance of dir Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for issuance of dir respondents to submit the final investigation report in FIR No.16 dated respondents to submit the final investigation report in FIR No.16 dated respondents to submit the final investigation report in FIR No.16 dated respondents to submit the final investigation report in FIR No.16 dated 59 of Arms Act, at P.S. egistered under Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, at P.S. egistered under Sections 25, 54, 27.12.2023 registered under Sections 25, 54, Punjab State Crime Wing, District SAS Nagar.
Punjab State Crime Wing, District SAS Nagar. Punjab State Crime Wing, District SAS Nagar. r, Status report by way of an affidavit of Bikramjit Singh Brar, Status report by way of an affidavit of Bikramjit Singh Bra Status report by way of an affidavit of Bikramjit Singh Bra PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Gangster Task Force, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Gangster Task Force, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Gangster Task Force, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Gangster Task Force, State, the same is taken Punjab has been filed on behalf of respondent-State, the same is taken Punjab has been filed on behalf of respondent Punjab has been filed on behalf of respondent on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the bail application. present petition with liberty to file regular bail application. present petition with liberty to file regular Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
04.09.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.09.06 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 25.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 04 Sep 2024. The bench was HARKESH MANUJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.