(O&M) RFA No. Ramotar Yadav and ors. Ramotar Yadav and ors. …… v. Versus State of Haryana & ors. State of Haryana .…
Case Details
RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [1] (33 cases) 104 (33 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH ***** Date of Decision: Date of Decision: 22.08.2025 RFA No.2644 of 2009 (O&M) RFA No. Ramotar Yadav and ors. Ramotar Yadav and ors. …….Appellants Versus Versus State of Haryana & ors. State of Haryana .….Respondents MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA CORAM: Present: Sh. Ajay Jain, Advocate and Sh. Ajay Jain, Advocate and Sh.Tarun Yadav, Advocate Sh.Tarun Yadav, Advocate for the appellants/landowners Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana /landowners. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Regular First Vide this common order, a bunch of 33 Regular First Vide this common order, a bunch of details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, Appeals, details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, Appeals, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common For acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No.2644 -2009. convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No. convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No. 2. By way of filing the present appeal challenge has been way of filing the present appeal(s) challenge has been laid to the decision dated the decision dated 27.08.2008 passed by learned Additional 27.08.2008 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul-cum-Reference Court District Judge, Reference Court. 3. land measuring 41.76 Brief facts of the case are that land measuring 41.76 Brief facts of the case are that nue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast acres situated within revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast nue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast acres situated within reve No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [2] Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed ated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public by notification dated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public ated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public by notification d purpose, namely, development and utilization of land as Sector purpose, namely, development and utilization purpose, namely, development and utilization of land as Sector-1 Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, assessed the market value of the acquired land assessed the market value of the per acquired land @ Rs.2,00,000/- per acre along with all other statutor acre along with all y benefits vide award dated statutory benefits vide award dated 13.7.2001. 13.7.2001. 3. Feeling aggrieved, Feeling aggrieved, Feeling aggrieved, the the the landowners landowners landowners filed filed filed reference reference reference petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market aded that the land in question is adjacent value. It has been further pleaded that the land in question is adjacent aded that the land in question is adjacent value. It has been further ple to Sector-1 which is already developed in all respects to Sector planned 1 which is already developed in all respects been planned commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, as residential-cum-commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, as residential it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 sq. yards ds away from the Highway and near thus away from the Highway and near the Canal Colony; thus having greater potential. having greater potential. 4. The Reference Court, after examining and taking into The Reference Court, after examining and taking into The Reference Court, after examining and taking into consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated per 8.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation @ Rs. 190/- per 8.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation 27.08.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation statutory benefits as available under square yards alongwith all other statutory benefits as available under statutory benefits as available under square yards alongwith all A), Section 23(2) and Section 28 of the Act. Section 23(1-A), Section 23(2) and Section 28 of the Act. Section 23(1 5. the landowners/appellants Seeking further enhancement, the landowners/appellants Seeking further enhancement RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [3] appeals, while preferred present appeals, while preferred the the e being respondent-State being respondent dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, also preferred appeals. also preferred appeals. 6. Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel that the revenue estate of appearing for the appellants submits that the revenue estate of appearing for the appellants submits appearing for the appellants submits Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with e Narnaul, which has been respect to the revenue estate of Village Narnaul, which has been respect to the revenue estate of Villag respect to the revenue estate of Villag acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has per sq. yards assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/- per sq. yards assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/ assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/ and thus the same compensation should and thus the awarded in favour of should be awarded in favour of landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of land under acquisition pertaining to land under acquisition pertaining to the revenue estate of Village the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court be enhanced. learned Reference Court be enhanced. learned Reference Court be enhanced. 7. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that no On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that erference was called for with the market value assessed by the interference was called for with the market value assessed by the erference was called for with the market value assessed by the erference was called for with the market value assessed by the for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur. for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur learned Reference Court for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur learned Reference Court RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [4] He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms part of notification dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section part of notification 4 of the dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, such the land situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, such the land situated with could not be which is the subject matter of present acquisition could not be which is the subject matter of present acquisition which is the subject matter of present acquisition similar to equated for the purpose of assessment of market value as similar to equated for the purpose of assessment of m equated for the purpose of assessment of m Learned State counsel also submits that that of Village Narnaul. Learned State counsel also submits that Learned State counsel also submits that that of Village Narnaul. once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur only, the same cannot Buchakpur only, be relied upon being post- same cannot be relied upon being post notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court be set aside. be set aside 8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone . I find substance in the submissions made through the paper-book(s). I find substance in the submissions made . I find substance in the submissions made through the paper on behalf of the appellants/ landowners on behalf of the appellant s/ landowners. 9. A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition akpur is situated near forming part of revenue estate of Village Buchakpur is situated near forming part of revenue estate of Village Buch forming part of revenue estate of Village Buch residential colonies and developed residential colonies and developed Narnaul- is also adjoining Narnaul is also Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage besides having potential value as well besides having potential value . Relevant paragraphs 39 & 40 as well. Relevant paragraphs 39 & 40 of of of the Reference Court award the Reference Court award the Reference Court award in in in d, are extracted this regard, are extracted this regar this regar RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [5] hereunder:- hereunder: “39. There are other factors which proves that the There are other factors which proves that the There are other factors which proves that the valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector is meager. The land is situated near already is meager. The land is situated near already is meager. The land is situated near already developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. and Moti Devender Kumar Patwari. Shiv Colony and Moti Devender Kumar Patwari. Shiv Colony Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired for Sector-1 part 1 as admitted by RW1 Thus the 1 part-1 as admitted by RW1 Thus the acquired land is potential for residential and acquired land is potential for residential and acquired land is potential for residential and commercial There are two highways near the commercial There are two highways near the commercial There are two highways near the Mahendergarh acquired land namely Narnaul-Mahendergarh acquired land namely Narnaul Road and Narnaul-Singhana Road. Road and Narnaul 40. In all those cases where the market value of the In all those cases where the market value of the In all those cases where the market value of the acquired land has to be assessed there is bound acquired land has to be assessed there is bound acquired land has to be assessed there is bound to occur some guess work. Since the land is to occur some guess work. Since the land is to occur some guess work. Since the land is situated adjacent to the already developed land situated adjacent to the already developed land situated adjacent to the already developed land to Sector-1 Part 1, so a very little effort is 1 Part-1, so a very little effort is equired required equired to develop to develop to develop the acquired the acquired the acquired land. land. land. Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair mumkin is also not required, as a house built on mumkin is also not required, as a house built on mumkin is also not required, as a house built on a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi or gair mumkin land.” or gair mumkin land.” 10. acquisition which is In view of the fact that the land under acquisition which is In view of the fact that the land under situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having of its locational advantage as well as potential value because of its locational advantage as well as potential value because locational advantage as well as potential value because part of the vicinity of already geographical location and forms part of the vicinity of already part of the vicinity of already geographical location developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. Narnaul- -Mahendergah and Narnaul-Singhana Road abuts Singhana Road and also abuts another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [6] and the said land of Village Narnaul immediately and the said land of Village Na the already rnaul immediately abuts the already existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for acquired vide same the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was acquired vide same the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was notification dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act notification dated and 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act and also for the same purpose. also for the same purpose 11. onsidering the fact that the land forming part of the Thus, considering the fact that the land forming part of the onsidering the fact that the land forming part of the revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, Narnaul; and the land forming part of reve Narnaul; nue estate of Village the land forming part of revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated at some distance from already existing Sector 1, Narnaul, at some distance as the from already existing Sector 1, Narnaul, as the part of Village Narnaul exists between the chunk of land which forms part of Village Narnaul exists between the part of Village Narnaul exists between the chunk of the already developed Sector 1, land of Village Buchakpur and the already developed Sector 1, the already developed Sector 1, land of Village Buchakpur and Narnaul; in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of Rs.386/- per sq. yards which has been assessed in relation to the has been assessed in relation to the in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided revenue estate of Village Narnaul in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided revenue estate of Village on 22.08.;2025. The market value for the land acquired on 22.08.;2025 forming . The market value for the land acquired and forming part of the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/- revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/ the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/ per sq. yards (Rs.386 – 10%) i.e. Rs.16,65,600/ per sq. yards (Rs.386 The 10%) i.e. Rs.16,65,600/- per acre. The rs shall also be entitled for all other statutory appellants/ landowners shall also be entitled for all other statutory rs shall also be entitled for all other statutory appellants/ landowne benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [7] the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of the the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the sent judgment deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the present judgment deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the pre deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the pre qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution applications in this regard. applications in this regard. 12. Consequently, Consequently, the appeals the appeal filed by filed by the appellants/ the appellants landowners are allowed in the aforesaid terms; landowners are in the aforesaid terms; whereas the appeal the appeals filed at the instance of State are hereby filed at the instance of State hereby dismissed. 13. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand
Decision
disposed of. disposed of. .08.2025 22.08.2025 sanjay (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? Yes/No Yes/No Case No. Case No. Title Sr. No. 1 2. RFA No. 3. RFA No. 4. RFA No. OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF RFA No.4815/2006 OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF RFA No. HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. RFA No.4809/2006 HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF RFA No.5592/2008 SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND RFA No.5691/2008 SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HOSHIAR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HOSHIAR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.1173/2007 HOSHIAR SINGH RFA No.1174/2007 HOSHIAR SINGH 5. RFA No. 6. RFA No. RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [8] 10. RFA No. 11. RFA No. 16. RFA No. 17. RFA No. 7. RFA No. 8. RFA No. 9. RFA No. 12. RFA No. 13. RFA No. 14. RFA No. 15. RFA No. RFA No.50/2007 RFA No.4816/2006 JAI PARKASH RFA No.294/2008 SMT. BIRMATI RFA No.297/2008 MANGAL RAM RFA No.5406/2008 SAJJAN SINGH RFA No.298/2008 JASWANT SINGH RFA No.293/2008 LEKH RAM AND ORS. RFA No.295/2008 RAMOVTAR AND ANR. RFA No.292/2008 HARI SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARI SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF JAI SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RFA No.296/2008 JAI SINGH AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAMOVTAR AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF SMT. BIRMATI VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF MANGAL RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF LEKH RAM AND ORS.VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF JASWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF JAI PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARYANA AND VS. STATE BHIM SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE BHIM SINGH AND ORS. OF HARYANA AND ORS. OF HARYANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND HARYANA AND ANR. VS. NETAR PAL AND ANOTHER VS. RFA No.5407/2008 NETAR PAL AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. BHIM SINGH AND ORS. BHIM SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.553/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SAJJAN SINGH AND ANR. SAJJAN SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.554/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. RFA No.555/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.MANGAL SINGH AND ANR. VS.MANGAL SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.556/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RAM AVTAR AND ORS. RAM AVTAR AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.557/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SMT.BIRMATI AND ORS. SMT.BIRMATI AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.558/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. LEKH RAM LEKH RAM AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. RFA No.559/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.HARI SINGH AND ORS. VS.HARI SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. RFA No.763/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.JAGAT SINGH AND ANR. VS.JAGAT SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.764/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JAI SINGH AND ORS. JAI SINGH AND ORS. HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JAI PARKASH AND ANR. JAI PARKASH AND ANR. RFA No.552/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND RFA No.776/2007 STATE OF 18. RFA No. 19. RFA No. 20. RFA No. 21. RFA No. 22. RFA No. 23. RFA No. 24. RFA No. 25. RFA No. 26. RFA No. 27. RFA No. 28. RFA No. RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases other connected cases [9] 29. RFA No. 30. RFA No. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.797/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. NETARPAL AND ORS. NETARPAL AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.1033/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JASWANT SINGH AND ORS. JASWANT SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.1034/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. DEVENDER KUMAR DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA No.1035/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. OM PARKASH AND ANR. OM PARKASH AND ANR. 31. RFA No. 32. RFA No. 22.08.2025 22.08.2025 sanjay (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE