✦ High Court of India · 26 May 2026

Petitionerssss v. STATE OF HARYANA

Case Details High Court of India · 26 May 2026
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 May 2026
Length
1,565 words

Cited in this judgment

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJMANUJMANUJMANUJAAAA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH CORAM: CORAM: Present: Mr. Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. for the petitioner HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) **** [1]. petition filed under Article 227 of the By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the petition filed under Article 227 of the By way of present Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the Execution Application Executing Court to decide the Execution Application No.369 of 2025 titled as ‘ titled as ‘Lal Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others vs. State of Haryana and ors.” ” in an expeditious and time bound time bound period. [2]. [3]. Notice of motion. Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryan On asking of the Court, and Mr. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 H.S. Gill, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 and 3 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the respectively. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also in view of the nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity nature of order which this Court proposes to pass at this stage, there is no necessity at this stage, as no order prejudicial of calling upon response from the respondents at this stage, as no order prejudicial at this stage, as no order prejudicial of calling upon response from the respondent st is being passed. to their interest is being passed. [4]. Briefly stating, in view of Award Briefly stating passed by the Award dated 16.05.2024 passed by the learned Reference Court Reference Court, the petitioners filed Execution Petition No. 2025 filed Execution Petition No.369 of 2025 on 16.07.2025 before the learned before the learned Additional District District Judge, Gurugram and since then the same is pending consideration however, till date, the enhanced amount of the same is pending consideration, however, till date, the enhanced amount of however, till date, the enhanced amount of compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioners. compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioner compensation has not been disbursed to the petitioner CR No.4483 of 2026 (O&M) [5]. Learned counsel for the petitioners Learned counsel for the petitioner s submits that the petitioners being aggrieved of the non-disbursal of amount of compensation aggrieved of the non filed the present amount of compensation have filed the present Executing Court concerned revision petition for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court concerned revision petition for issuance of direction to the revision petition for issuance of direction to the to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. to decide the execution application expeditiously, in a time bound manner. 2 [6]. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through I have heard learned counsel for the parties and I have heard learned counsel for the parties and paper book. [7]. ication filed by the A perusal of record shows that execution application filed by the A perusal of record shows that execution appl A perusal of record shows that execution appl petitioner(s) on 16.07 the adjudication. 16.07.2025 is pending for the adjudication. [8]. andhi and others reported as Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and others In Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G reported as In andhi and others andhi and others Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar G

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments