CRM-M No. 29940 of 2026 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120, 471
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. ds dismissed as In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In view of the above, the present petition stan withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Judgment
ALOK JAIN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Sumit Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
#1. The The The present present present petition petition petition seeking seeking seeking cancellation/rejection of the anticipatory bail granted cancellation/rejection of by Additional the anticipatory bail granted by Additional to respondent No. 2 Sessions Judge, District Faridabad, State of Haryana to respondent No. 2 Sessions Judge, District Faridabad, State of Haryana Sessions Judge, District Faridabad, State of Haryana vide order dated 07.03.2026 in case FIR No. 302 dated 27.08.2024, vide order dated 07.03.2026 in case FIR No. 302 dated 27.08.2024, vide order dated 07.03.2026 in case FIR No. 302 dated 27.08.2024, vide order dated 07.03.2026 in case FIR No. 302 dated 27.08.2024, registered under Sections 120-B, 420, 448, 467 registered under Sections 120 and 471 of the IPC B, 420, 448, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC orresponding to Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the (corresponding to Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the orresponding to Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the orresponding to Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the BNS, 2023) at Police Station Faridabad Central, District Faridabad. BNS, 2023) at Police Station Faridabad Central, District Faridabad. BNS, 2023) at Police Station Faridabad Central, District Faridabad.
#2. Mr. Yuvraj Singh Chauhan, Advocate, has put in appearance Mr. Yuvraj Singh Chauhan, Advocate, has put in appearance Mr. Yuvraj Singh Chauhan, Advocate, has put in appearance orney, which is on behalf of respondent No. 2 and filed his power of attorney, which is on behalf of respondent No. 2 and filed his power of att on behalf of respondent No. 2 and filed his power of att taken on record. taken on record.
#3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly prays for withdrawal Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly prays for withdrawal Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the same Court, while of the present petition with liberty to approach the same Court, while of the present petition with liberty to approach the same Court, while of the present petition with liberty to approach the same Court, while keeping all his contentions open. keeping all his contentions open. CRM-M-29940 29940-2026 -2-
#4. ds dismissed as In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as In view of the above, the present petition stan withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
#5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is only at the request of on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is only at the request of on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is only at the request of on the merits of the case. The liberty granted is only at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed as a direction. learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed learned counsel for the petitioner and shall not be construed July 03, 2026 July 03, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- Whether Reportable: Yes/No Yes/No (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120, 471; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 03 Jul 2026. The bench was ALOK JAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.