(O&M) v. KOSHALYA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Aashish Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Aashish Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Aashish Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Malzish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Malzish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Malzish Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA **** By way of present petition filed under Article 227 of By way of present petition filed under Article 227 of By way of present petition filed under Article 227 of By way of present petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, prayer has been made for setting aside the order Constitution of India, prayer has been made for setting aside the order Constitution of India, prayer has been made for setting aside the order Constitution of India, prayer has been made for setting aside the order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned District Judge, Nuh and order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned District Judge, Nuh and order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned District Judge, Nuh and order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned District Judge, Nuh and order , dated 28.05.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), dated 28.05.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, dated 28.05.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, 1 Nuh vide which the application of petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 Nuh vide which the application of petitioner under Order 39 Rule Nuh vide which the application of petitioner under Order 39 Rule and 2 CPC has been dismissed. and 2 CPC has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty Dismisse with aforesaid liberty. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
11.07.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.07.12 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 11 Jul 2024. The bench was HARKESH MANUJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.