✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 24 Mar 2026

CRM-M No. 33256 of 2023 · Punjab & Haryana High Court

CRM-M No. 33256 of 2023RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Case at a glance

Order date
24 Mar 2026
Bench
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL

Judgment

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Chahit Bansal, Mr. Chahit Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate Mr. Jaideep Verma, for respondent No.2. for respondent No.2. ***** ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1.

filed by the learned State counsel, the As per status report filed by the learned State counsel, the filed by the learned State counsel, the As per status report learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition being a premature petition. being a premature petition.

2.

Dismissed as withdrawn. Dismissed as withdrawn.

24.03.2026 Gurpreet (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No GURPREET 2026.03.25 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 33256 of 2023). ← Search more judgments