ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, at this stage, without com Acco case, ut commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is ition is disposed of with a direction to re cision to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the legal notic l notice dated…
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI CORAM : HON HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA HON AK SIBAL A BANERJI Present : Mr. R Mr. Rohiteshwar Singh, Advocate, for te, for the petitioners. Mr. r. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. A.S. Sidhu, Advocate for responde Mr. A pondent No.7. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, IBAL, J. (Oral)
#1. Learned counsel for the petitioners su Lear submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the if the present writ petition is disposed posed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Deputy Com y Commissioner-cum-Collector, District n the istrict Karnal to take a decision on the legal notice dated dated 02.01.2019 (Annexure P-13), subm . , submitted on behalf of the petitioners.
#2. Learned State counsel, who appears Lear pears on advance notice and learned counsel for respon respondent No.7, have no objection if the if the above prayer is accepted.
#3. Accordingly, at this stage, without com Acco case, ut commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is ition is disposed of with a direction to re cision to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the legal notic l notice dated 02.01.2019 (Annexure P ure P-13), submitted on behalf of the petitioners, by pas by passing a speaking order and after gra to all ter granting opportunity of hearing to all affected parties an ties and in accordance with law, prefera m the referably within three months from the date of receipt of a pt of a copy of this order.
#4. Needless to add that the decision so Need to the ion so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if t nd if the decision is not to the satisfactio uld be faction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challen challenge the same, in accordance with la with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE
13.11.2025 Prince Whether speaking/reasone PRINCE SAINI 2025.11.13 21:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document easoned : Yes / No Whether reportable [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No :
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.