✦ High Court of India · 25 May 2010

Nos3998 8 8588of2010 v. Kurukshet raUniversit yKurukshet raand

Case Details High Court of India · 25 May 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 May 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
2,705 words

The first condit ion being allocat ion of st udent sand of t he st udent sas also t heir willingnesst o seek adm issions and t he secondcondit ion is t he opinionof t he universit yas t o whet her t he could com plet et he requisit eessent ial lect urers before t he t 1 0 C X C Z C X c5 03 W3 Z exam inat ion I t is st at edon behalfof t he Universit yt hat t he Universit yhas 49eV1 issued not ificat ion t he academ iccalendarand t he annual exam inat ionoft he BEd course is t o com m ence from 152010 for pract ical andt heoryexam inat ionon 1062010 and t hus it is t o com plet e 180 dayscourse duringt he availablenum berof 80 dayseven from t he dat e ofj udgm ent Singh Gagan Preet 2014.05.22 14: 13 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORI GI NAL PHHC CHANDI GARH The st udent swho are t o 4 in CWP No588 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of2010 69 cwr Nos3998 8588of2010 5 1 1 t iavest at edt hatt hey adm issionin t heCollegewhich is CWPN03998 of2010 inresponset o t headvert isem ent in Am ar and Hari Bhum i newspapers t he in t he Raj 1 0 C X C5 Z Z X 05 r 7 Z 0 J of Educat ion on 10102009 t o 12102009 Theyhave furt herst at edt hat t hey fee wit h t he Collegeand classeshave com m encedon 522010But t heir exam inat ionform s have not been ent ert ainedbyt he Universit y I have hard learnedcounselfor t hepart iesat lengt h Earlierwrit pet it ionof t he ie CWP No 15634of 2009has beenallowedby t his Court quashingt he show cause not ice dat ed25fo2009 I t is relevantt o m ent ion t hat in t he said showe not ice affiliat ion of t he was wit hheld and t he was debarredfrom in t he adm ission process Whent his Court passedorderdat ed902009 for allocat ionof 100 direct ion was t o t he t o allocat e t he st udent s on t he basis of counsellingI t 1S posit ivecase of t he universit yt hat no held aft er 3092009 I t is also not t he case of t he t hat 100 st udent swere allocat edby t he universit ylll t he aft er 90009 The claim s t o have held counsellingon 11102009byit self under t he int erim direct ion oft his Courtdat ed 902009 As a m at t er offact t he pet it ionerwas not ent it led t o holdcounsellingit self under t he order dat ed 902009 I n t he dat ed 22010 in t he aforesaidwrit pet it ionwhile set t ingasidet he showuse not icet his Court had t wo condit ions for adm ission of 100st udent sThe first condit ion as not icedabovewas allocat ion of t he st udent s t heir availabilit y and willingnessThe word allocat ion Singh Gagan Preet 2014.05.22 14: 13 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORI GI NAL PHHC CHANDI GARH t he order m eant allocat ion by t he Universit y The JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 70 cvyr Nos39988 8588of2010 6 1 Universit y deniedhavingm adeany allocat ionof st udent sand so becauseno was held byUniversit yaft er3092009 TheSrst condit ion of allocat ion of st udent sis it self not ful8lled Even t he ot hert wo condit ions no m at erialhasbeenplacedon record t o t hat 100 st udent sare availablewit h t he who are t heyand whet her t heyare willingor not 2 The assert ion of t he t hat100 st udent sare availablewit h it are not byany m at erialon record wit h t he nam es of t he st udent s t heirrnarkst o eligibilit yOnlyfour st udent shave com e forwardin CWPNo588 of 2010 claim ingt o be adm it t edin t he t his pet it ionhavingbeen by t he Collegecannot be ruled out There is anot heraspectof t he m at t er On t he one hand it is pleaded by t he t hat t heyadm it t edt he st udent spursuantt o t he int enm orderdat ed9O2009 and on t he ot her hand it is st at ed t hat t he adm it t edt he st udent son t he basisof direct ions in anot her CWP No1272 of 2009 decidedon 1782009 This writ pet it ionwas filed by ofEducat ionalCollegesofHaryanat o fill up unfilled vacancies of BEd course 111 t he m em ber t he Associat ion Det ailed direct ionswere issued t he Associat ion t o advert ise available vacanciesand t o m ake adm issionsin accordancewit h t he various direct ions issuedt herein One of t he direct ionswas t hat t he shaI l be conduct edin t he presence of t he t he Universit yand int im at ionshall be given aft ert he counsellingwhich was t o be heldfrom 80009 t o 1202009 Neit her in t he earI ier writ pet it ion1eee 1 0 C Z C5 Z Z Z 06 QO 7 Q 4ee CWP N015634 of 2009 filed by t he t he present Singh Gagan Preet 2014.05.22 14: 13 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORI GI NAL PHHC CHANDI GARH it is pleadedt hat it had advert isedvacancies pursuantt o t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 71 Nos39988 85880f2010 r 7 direct ions dat ed 1792009 cont ainedin t he order passedin CWP Nol1272of2009 Thispleawas raisedduringt hecourse of hearingof t his The pleaof t he I n one breat h it 1S t hat st udent swere allocat edt o it on t he basis of t he int erimorderdat ed9102009 passedin CWP No 15634of 2009andin t he second breat h it 1S t o be t hat adm issions were m ade t o t he direct ions dat ed 1792009 passedin CWP No11272 of 2009 Even t he four st udent swhoare claimt heir in CWP No588 of 2010 adm ission on t hebasisof t he advert isem entnot ice issuedbyt he Collegefor holdingcounsellingon 11102010 and 12102010 I t t o not e t hat at no st aget he Collegewas t o issue any publicnot ice I n any case t he Collegecould not have issued publicnot ice for holding on 1102009 as it hadno affiliat ion it saffiliat ionhavingbeenwit hheldbyt heUniversit ybyvirt ue oft he not lce dat ed2562009 which cam e t o be int o t he ot her quest ionwhet hert he onlyon 222010 Wit hout going 180 Call daysof t helect uresor not bot h t he pet it ionsare liable t o be dism issedfor t hefollowingreasonsl oNo st udent was allocat ed t o t he by t he pursuantt o t he int erim order dat ed 902009 passedin CWP No5634 of2009 m 0 C0 2m C9wm m Z Z m X 08 C W7 10 Qa Ve 6iiThere lS no m at erialon record regardingt heavailabilit yof 100 st udent s t heir exceptt he four st udent swho are writ pet it ioners111 CWP No588 of2010 iii9Even t hese four st udent swere not allocat ed seat s by t he Universit y who claim t o have got adm ission on t he basis of t he Singh Gagan Preet 2014.05.22 14: 13 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORI GI NAL PHHC CHANDI GARH for which t he a publicnot ice issued by was never pennit t ed JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document l CWP Nos3998 4 8588of 2010 8 t any st age 1 I n view of t he above circum st ancesbot h t he writ pet it ionsare dism issedHowever t he will be ent it ledt o 111 t he processandadm itt he st udent sfor t henext academ icsession 2010201 Copyoft his orderbe placedon recordofeach concernedflle 6PERMODKOHLI I JUDGE 44 4e 32010 MFK NOTE2Whet her t o be referred t o Report eror not 2NO m 1 3 0 C 3 C9 S4 a 2 Ll 5a ct j C0 e2 22 t le Singh Gagan Preet 2014.05.22 14: 13 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORI GI NAL PHHC CHANDI GARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments