✦ High Court of India · 17 Sep 2010

CWP Noe733 of2010 v. Mr Sum anJain Advocat efor t he pet it ioner

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Sep 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Sep 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
2,773 words

CM hasdesiredt hatShri KS DahiyaDFSC Kurukshet ra m aybet ransferredt o SonepatagainstShri N0 Mit t al andvice versa Sd MS Chopral OSDI CM I l 091209 HonFSM Away apprisedoj o Exam ine about st ay at t hse slat ions and workingrecord of et c and pul up FSM ll1209 llhe flle has been sent t o FinancialCom m issioner l7ood 8 Supplies and t o ot herfunct ionariesA det ailedreportis recordedbySFS on 1822009 This not ereadsas under Usubj ect Regardingt ransfer of Dist rict Food c Supplies Cont rollers Vide V leller a t rr not e has been t he OSDI CM whereinit has beenwrit t en t hal Honble CM has deserved t hat Shri KS DohiyaDFSC Kurukshet ram ay be iransferredt o SonepatagainstShn NK Mit t al and vice versa On t his not e Food JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Pooja 2014.04.21 12:45 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh 93 4 CWP No 733 of2010 1 00 1 Minist er had ordered t o exam ine about st ayat lhese st at ionsand workingrecord et c and putup Wit h regardt o t he order of t he Honble Food Minist er on t he V let t er it is herebyexplainedt hat vide governm enlorder which was issued vide I nem o No 1412512006041SJ248AAon 21082009 Shri KS DahiyaDist rict Food and SuppliesCont roller wast ransrredfromSonepalt o Kunilcshet raagainstvacant postand Shri NK Mit t al Dist I t Food and SuppliedCont roller was Karnal t o SonepatagainstShri KS DahiyaDist rict Food and SuppliedConlroller I n t his way onlyfour m ont hshave expired t o t he t ransferof Shri KS Dahiyaand Shri NK Mit t al Dist rict Food and SuppliesCont rollers I nsofwas t heirworkingrecord is concerned is will be appropriat et o have a reportfrom t he Purchase Branch St orage Branch and General Food Branch of t he Headquart erso t hat t he Honble Food Minist er will be appraisedof accordinglyon t he basis oft hatreportFile is beingpresent edforordersAl 18122009 SFS 1 0 0 C3 I C I Z I 08 Qo 2 Z Om From t he above not e ll 1S evident t hat t ransfer of respondentNo2 was at t he inst anceooft heChief Minist er who desiredt het ransfetof t he No2 t o Sonepatand lhat of pet it ionert o Kurukshet raI n t he not e t ransferof bot h t heseofficersat t heir respect iveplaccsic Kurukshelraand SoncpatOt l 21 182009 is also m ent ioned A reportwas soughtfrom t hePurchaseBranch St orageBranch and GeneralFood Branchof t he Reportsubm it t edregardingbot ht he officials is as under Pooja 2014.04.21 12:45 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 94 1 CWP No 733of2010 1 ne6 m C 0 C I C5 Z I 08 Cll 7 Z 0m Bot h Sh KS Dahia and Sh NK Mit t al are t heir dut ies at Kurukshet raand Sonepat t he last fourm ont hs 29 Bot h are from t he sam e bat ch 0 9881HaryanaCivil Services and allied services 3 As per t heinform at iongivenbySupdtPublic Dist ribut ion Olereis no cigainstany oflhe 08lcers 41 I n Kurukshet ra we ht 711e83256 M7S of wheat in st orageand I n Sonepatt hequant it yis 29546 MTS as on 15122009 aoodDept t J 59 The crucial MSP in t his case lS t hat t he quant it yof paddypurchasedon I n Sonepatt he quant it yis nil lhought he in t hecase ofKKR we have aood Dept t Jprocured415810 MTS fpaddyon MSP The fznancial involvem entin I Curuksllet ralS t o t he t une of 550 crores rupees The rnciinprincipleof PR work as hQs evolved in t he last 75 yearsis t o see asfaras possiblet hat t he sam e set ofofcerslooicials shouldliquidat et he st ockswho havepurchasedit Ot herwisein case of defaultit becom esvery lo j lx t he Most of t he cases of defaultin our are due t o slich t ransfersand such caseshave becom everyledious Casem aypleasebe senl t o Honble FSMforhisorder DFS Sd 2609 1 This reportwas sent by t he Financial Minist er on 04209 t o Financial Com m issionerFood 8 Supplieswho also approvedit and Onallyt he t ransferorder was issued on 13Ol2010 under t he signat uresof t he Financial Com m issionerand PrincipalSecret aryt o Governm entofHaryanaFood Supplies 1 Pooja 2014.04.21 12:45 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh From t he above not e on t he Ole and even from t he I lle of t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 95 m 0 C0 C0 I Z r 8 Po t 0 nW CWP Noe733 of2010 7 it appearst hat t he t ransferis purelyat t he askingof t he Chief Minist er No reason for re4ransferof t he No back t o Sonepatj ustaft er Ove m ont hshasbeen recorded I t is surprisingt o not e t hat in t he ent ire record produced no groundhasbeenm ent ionedfor t ransferof No2 t o Sonepat From t he record producedit appearst hat on t he occasionof earlier t ransfer t he not e is preparedby lhc ofOce and aAcr passingt hroughvanous channelsgoes upt ot heChief Minist er who Onallyapprovesit and t ransferorder is issued However in t he presentcase t he procedureadopt edis t ot allyreverse of t he norm alprocedurcI n t he presentcase t he init ial not e has em anat edfrom t he om ce oft he Chief Minist er who desiredt he t ransferand t hat t oo onlya singlet ransferof t he No in placeof t he pet ilioncrI t is relevantt o not et hatbot ht hese 0fllcials were t ransferredonlyI n t he m ont h of August 2009 and j ust aft er Ove m ont hsim pugncdt ransoferorder hasbeenissued in cont ravent ionof Governm ent s t ransferpolicyThis t ransferis purelyat t he inst ance of t he Chief Minist er Poweroft he ChiefMinist er lo t ransfera Governm entem ployeehast o beconceded t o him he beingt he Chief 13xecut iveof t hcGovernm entThe quest ionis not oft he aut horit yand power t o t ransfer a Governm ent elnployeeThe quest ionis of t he legit im acyof t helransfer which is underscrulinyI n t he presentcase is set t led principalof law t hat t ransfer is an exigencyof servicc and no Govem m ent 7 em ployeehas a rightt o rem aln a part icularpost or at a part icularplacebut t ransferon consideralionsot hert han lhe publicint erestand t o adj ustone em ployee at part icularplacein violat ion of nonnS lS t o be const rued a t ransfer act uat edby m alice Such m alice m ay not be againstt he person who m ay be affect edby such t ransferbut evcnt uallyt hereis official bias Om cial bias lS t o helpone of t he personm ay not be wit h inlent iont o harm t he ot her but t he ot her personis harm ed as a nat ural consequenceof helpingone Undcr norm al Clrcum slances int erferencein exercisingofj udicialreview in t he m at t er of t ransfcr JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Pooja 2014.04.21 12:45 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh I l 96 1 ef t CWP Noe733 of2010 J 8 of Governm entem ployeeis However t ransfer on account of m alafldeandbias is one of t he sit uat ion wheret heCourt is ent illedt o exerciset he powerofj udicialrevleWe I am of t heconsidered opiniont hat t his is one of such caseswhere bias is apparentand exercise of power ofj udicialreview is warrant ed is also relevant t o nole t hat even lherc is no applicalionon behalf of t he No2 for his re4ransfert o Sonep I t is also adm it ledposit iont hat No m ade purchasesof paddywort h Rs550 crores and is for it s deliveryt o Food CorporalionofI ndia afier converling111eI oaddyint o t llerice before3132010 13eforehe could discharget he of deliveryoflhe food grainshe was ordered t o be t ransfcrredfrom Kurukshct rat o SonepatAs a m at t er from t hc cnlire record 110 publicint erest what soeverhas been revealed I do not Ond any valid rcason for t he t ransferof lhepelit ionerwit llina periodof Ove m ont hsexceptt o rcet ransfert he No t o SonepatThis t ransferis 1iable t o be set aside t hus t he im pugnedorder dat ed 14ll2010 P21is herebyquashed 172010 nareshlc 11 Not e Whet hcr t o be referred t o report er l Yesl 311 PERMOD KOMLI I JUDGE e9eS e C 1 0 9 I Z 2 t t 18 7 Z 0 1 U 111 8ll Pooja 2014.04.21 12:45 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments