IN TH v. STATE OF PUN
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA IN TH AT CHANDIGAR UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 208 CRM-M N Date of De M No.30944 of 2024 of Decision: 05.08.2024 GURDEEP SING SINGH @ TALLI ......Petitioner ...... Vs STATE OF PUN PUNJAB ....Respondent ....Re CORAM: HON' ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Karandeep Singh, Advocate Present: Mr. K for the petitioner. for th Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. A HARKESH MAN MANUJA, J. (Oral) **** By way of this second petition filed u By w filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., pray ., prayer has been made made for grant of regular bail in il in case bearing FIR No.73 date 3 dated
03.11.2022 regist registered under Sections 406/148/14 148/149 IPC (Sections 302, 411, 120 , 120-B IPC added later o later on) at Police Station Sehna, Distt. , Distt. Barnala. Learned counsel for the petitioner Lear does not press this petition at th n at this stage. Dismissed as not pressed. Dism 4 August 05, 2024 Atik (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.08.05 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.