✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 29 May 2026

KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER & Ors. v. State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Versus State & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

petition is allowed and FIR No

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose…
  • Para 66. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others…
  • Para 77. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

Judgment

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Jashmed Ahmed, Mr. Jashmed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate Mr. Inderjeet Singh, for respondent No.2. for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

#1. Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.240, dated for quashing of FIR No.240, dated

08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at consequential Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and consequential Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P

05.05.2026 proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.05.2026 proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-3 3).

#2. This Court vide its order dated This had directed the order dated 14.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. genuineness of the compromise. CRM-M-27218 27218-2026 2

#3. have appeared before Sub Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before Sub Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties and got their Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, and got their Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, Sub s recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Sub s recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, has submitted report Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, dated 22.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between 22.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between to the effect that the compromise has been effected between rcion or undue influence. the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. the parties voluntarily and without any coe

#4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

#5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to he trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before t

#6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 in Gian Singh , this Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under petition is allowed and FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under petition is allowed and Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and consequential Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P ings arising consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) are therefrom on the basis of compromise dated therefrom on the basis of compromise dated quashed.

#7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

29.05.2026 Gurpreet (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is allowed and FIR No

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 29 May 2026. The bench was RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 27218 of 2026). ← Search more judgments