Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2010
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 28 Jan 2010
- Bench
- RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Outcome
Withdrawn
On his request, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Smt. Indu Bala and others **** VS. **** . . . . Appellants . . . . Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Anil Rathee, Advocate for the appellants. **** None for the respondents. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) In this appeal, order dated 25.11.2008 passed by the Commissioner under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 has been assailed whereby the appellants were directed to deposit Rs.2,35,530/- in the Court of Commissioner within 30 days failing which they were held liable to pay simple interest @ 12% per annum on the aforesaid amount from the date of order till its realization and appellants being Principal were ordered to be indemnified by the contractor. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that since the contractor has not indemnified the appellants, therefore, the present appeal has been filed. He further submits that in view of the communication letter date 20.10.2009 by the Contractor addressed to the AO (Cash), O/o General Manager Telecom District, Bharat Sanchar FAO No.33 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Nigam Limited, Sonepat, the Contractor has indemnified the appellants. He further submits that there is no grievance left on the part of the appellants for the purpose of redressal by this Court. Thus, he prays for withdrawal of the appeal. On his request, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. January 28, 2010 Vivek (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: On his request, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Jan 2010. The bench was RAKESH KUMAR JAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.