State of Haryana & Ors. v. Mr. Harish Nain, DAG Haryana-State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Consequently, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Kartik Khicher, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C). Mr. Harish Nain, DAG Haryana-State. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
#1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to recalculate the petitioner’s leave encashment by including 6 wrongly denied earned leaves and by applying the correct formula and consequently release the balance amount of Rs.40,050/- to petitioner without any further delay along with 15% interest. Further praying for quashing the impugned speaking order dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-2) to the extent that it wrongly calculates the petitioner’s earned leaves. Further praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to forthwith release the penalty amount of CWP-14781-2026 2 Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner, as imposed by this Court vide order dated
07.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in CWP-9976-2025.
#2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the present writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
#3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
#4. Consequently, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE
03.07.2026 Puneet Chawla Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable. :
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 03 Jul 2026. The bench was HARPREET SINGH BRAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.