Dr.Rohtash Yadav v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Mar 2011
- Bench
- MAHESH GROVER
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been wrongly suspended. He prays that action be initiated against the persons who wrongly suspended him. I am afraid, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India such matters cannot be determined. The petitioner, if so advised, may avail himself of any other remedy available under the law. Dismissed.
21.3.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 21 Mar 2011. The bench was MAHESH GROVER.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.