M/s Munish Kumar Bansal v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH
2. 3. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? To be referred to reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:-
Mr. P.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. ---
ORDER:
Challenge in this petition is to demand of cess from the petitioner under the provisions of the Building & other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that representation dated 24.8.2009, Annexure P-5, is pending before the competent authority i.e. respondent No.4 and it will be appropriate that the said authority takes a decision thereon in the first instance. CWP No.4398 of 2010 2 Without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent No.4 may take decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE April 05, 2010 ashwani ( ALOK SINGH ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Apr 2010. The bench was ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ALOK SINGH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.