W b 4l v. St at eofPunj aband andot hers

enshrinedlI l A1t iCle14 Of t he Const it ut ionof I ndia is a posit iveconceptand appliedln a negat ivem anner so as t o eit herperpet uat et he illegalit yor t COllit t he violence wit h t he st at ut e The obj ect purport of Alt icle 14 Of t heConst it ut ionof I ndia hasb6enconsideredbyt he Honble Court in vanous m ofBihar Vs 1 The lat estbeingin t he case of St at e Singhandot hers 20091 5 Suprem eCourt Cases65 whereinit hasbeenheid as underl 1 67 By now lt is set t l t hat t he guarant eeof equalit ybeforelaw enshrinedin Art icle 14 is a e 4 Suresh Kum ar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh clt izen or court posit iveconceptand it cannot be enforcedby a I ll in a negat ivem anner JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I f an 1 t 1 9V 1r I o 1 n 1 6 0t r f 9 o t 1 r 1 I ee eaa 4ed 00 1Seeel1Lt 40e 4llilr 4 433 v6 44 1 on1 541 Ur 1 nrr in51 I e 4 r 46 4 r t 446rW 1 151 0 t 4 has been com m it t edln favour of any individual or a group of individuals 4 a wrong order has been passedby a j udicial 16 1 1 1 e l 1 1 0 C C5 t r 08 m CL Gea forum ot herscannot invoke t 4 4 1e V higher or supenor court t 7 oft he t he sam e 5 illegalit y or for passingwrong order I l 4 I n t he case of Annam alaiUniversit y by Regist rar 01 Vs Secret aryt o Govem m entI nform at ionand Tourism Depart m entand 4 Court Cases 590 81rt herobservedt hat relaxat iongrant edt o t he necessaryfor 1t t conferm entofdegt eeis 1 Honble t he Court als fram edby t he Medical Council I e t he 941 in t he 4 9 5 9n of Medical Council of I e 48 1 I ndia l 1 n 141 St at e 6Cam at aka 74 e 0 4 r t JT 998 51 P 0 A sim ilarview wasalso expressed bsla Const it ut ion Court 40 Bench of t he Honble 14 Court in Dr 8 1 n Vs St at eof 4 e 1 A 1 I l 1 a MP And ot hers19977 SCC 120 4s Relying t he aforesaiddcisiOns a Fw r4 Bench of t hi t 11 Court int he case of Prabhaoor SinghHayer and ot heis Vs Baba Farid 1 Universit vof Healt h Sciencesand ot hers CWP No17820 of 2008 and ot herconnect edwrit pet it ionsldeciaedon 3002009 held t h t he 1 Wit h Q b layingdownt he st andardof st at ut ebe com plied I n view of t he above I l 1 I am of t he considered e opinlOnt hat t he relief prayedfor by t he Suresh Kum ar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 r 11 canhot be grant edlll JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document S 4 4 9 1 4 77 r e I t W 0I Ole 1 1 1e m m Aee r9w 4 5 S 1 r 61 e WPN0A165of2010 I W pl 4 440 P t r 1 t t P9 relaxat iot lof t he dism issedwit h no orderas t o cost s 1 1 4 7 all t he 1 1 t 0 A copy oft his orderbe placedon t he recordofot her connect ed 1 filese 132010 BLS P 1 Not el Whet hert o be referredt o t he r 4 4 r 4 e e PERMOP KOHLI I JUDGE 90 44 l Yes I ll 2 4 4 1 I l t 2 1 l t 1 1 4 1 7t S 2 14e 48a 1 410 W04 1 I 4e 1 1 b 9 r 1 0 0 C5 08 00 w 11 e5 4 1e n110 e9V 401 1 56 J 1 46 t fo 50 Gf 11 4 I l 1 Suresh Kum ar 2014.04.26 12: 49 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document