NaveenSingh Vse GuruNanak Dev and anot her 4 CWP N9277 of2009 Singh v. GuruNanak Dev andanot her 5 CWPNo3363of2009 Rim piKum ari VS GuruNanak Dev

first sem est cr t o sccond sem est cr wit hout lany condit ion However st ich a st udcllt can be t o t hird sem est er if he has passedat least 50 per cent of t he First t wo selnest ers For sem est er no condit ion is Againfor sem est era st udentm ust passat least 50 per ceot lt t o 4 t o 5 t hc flrst four sem est ers Again for from 5 t o 6 sem est cr 1Swit houtany condit ion For t o 7 sem est er a furt her clnbargo1S creat ed t hat t he st udent m usl pass all oft he first t wo sem est ers t o 8 sem est ers a st udentm ust qualifyall t he oft he flrst t hree t hereby a st udent will not be eligiblet 0 seek adm ission in 7 sem est erifhe has any reappearor first t wo sem est ers Sam e eligibilit ycondit ioon will applyfor reappearor t o 8 selnest er and if t he st udent has a offirst t hreesem est ers he is ineligiblet o seek adm issionin 8 sem est er Thegrievanceof t he is t hat t hc am endm cnt t he clarificat ion issued vide order dat cd Ol 082008 m 0 C C5 I Z t r 08 CQ r41 7 0 1S illegaland in cases of t he Wit h a view t o Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t heir cont ent ion reliance is placedon t lle Ordinance JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 83 1 l CWP No583 of2009 ee10 dat ed 14l l 2000 lnnexure Pell Which Wt lS lll force at t het im e of adm issionwhich onlyrequired40 pcr ccnt aggregat em arksof all t he papers ln a sem est er t he fact whet her a st lldentfails ln one or m ore papersof t hat scinest crs I t is furt her cont ended t hat cany Oll syst emwhich was int roduced 111 t he Calendar 1999 Vol I I I I has no t o t he Facult ies Law and School of Social Sciencesas 1S evident from Annexure 13 Even t hc am endlnent int roduced pursuantt o t he decision of t he vide I t eln No3 in t he held Oll 5122006 carry on syst emfor t lle Facult ies has been appliedfrom Session 20072008 I t is subm it t cdt hat Slllce t he adm it t ed in t he year 2005 t his alnendm entis againnot Pplicablet o t he havingbeen speciflcallym ade operat ivefrom Session 2007e2008 as per t he cont ained 111t he am endm entOrdinances it self I t 1S furt hercont endedt hat vide order dat edOl 082008 lnncxum Pe49 1 r 0 0 C5 I Z m 2 32 c4j QO e t l G herein t he am endm enthas been applied which has adverselyaffect ed t he career t he Aording t o t he leam ed counsel for t he pet it iollcrshad t he kt lown t hat t heywould be requiredt o clear all t he of flrst 213 sem est ers t heywould have concent rat ed on t llose papers on priorit y Now aft er t wo years t lle Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 0 C 0 Z t r X r c 84 r 1 1 1 t J CWP N8583 of2009 11 CllllllOt be punishedfor not havingcleared t he papers t wo years I t 1S t he case of t he t hat t he opcrat lollof t he rules is when it t akes away any of t he rightof t he hit her t o availableln exist iilg t o t he t he only for prom ot iont o t he seven and eight hsem est crs was t hat aandidat e should secure 40 per cent m arksin aggrcgat cin a sem est er of t he fact whet hera candidat ehas failed 111 one or m ore oft he papersoft hat sem est er I n t he replyflled by t he t he Universit yhas relied upon t he order dat ed Ol 082008 whereby carry on syst emhasbeen appliedt o all t he courses t he exceptLaw and School of Social Sciences Thcse t wo courses being Ordinances I t lS reit erat edt hat any havingsupplent ies 111 t he flrst t wo sem est ers is ineligiblefor seekingadm ission t o 7 sem cst er and a candidat ehavingrcappear 111first t hrce sem est ers 1Sineligiblet o seek adm issoionin 8 sem est er lt is st at edt hal as a m at t cr of fact order dat edOl 082008 1S not all alnclldm ellt t o t hc but onlybyWay ofclarificat ion as previousOrdinances of 2000 were in t his regardand t hus neccssit at eda clarificat ion I t is m ent ionedlll t he replyflled by t he Universit y t hat som c Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he who had 111 reappear JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 85 1 D 1J CWP No8583 of2009 re12 exam inat ionsOll t wo sem est ers were grant ed adm issiont o 7 sem est ersubj ectt o clearanceoft he oft he flrst t wo scm est ers on t heir filingof t he affldavit t hat iil t he event of t he failure of t he candidat et o clear t he reappear of flrst lwo sem cst erst he adm ission t o 7 sem est er could be cancelled Sim ilar affidavit s were filed by t he sccured adm ission 1118 selnest er while 111flrst t hrec seinest erspapers 1t is subm it t edt hat laI l t he adm issiollst o 7 and 8 sem est ersin respectt o t he candidat eswho had of Orst 213sem cst crs were provisionalin nat ure and could be cancelled Oll t helr failure t o clear t he When t hese pet it ionswere filed iont erimordcrs were passedby t his Court in CWP No8583 of 2009 Oll 29052009 ent ryin 8 sem est er Sim ilar ordersWere passedi1lot her m Q 0 Cal I 0 I Z m r r c6 OO t e Ll writ pet it ionsperm iuingt he pet it onerst o seekadm issioil iil 7 allcl 8 selncst ers and also t o appear111t lle exam inat ionsfrom t im e t o t im c C Mr0S Pat walia leam ed counsel for t he has however arguedt hat neit her t he OrdinanCCS carryingon syst emare 111nat urenor t he order dat ed Ol082008 can be const ruedt o have His furt her cont ent ionist hat t he Universit yis ent it led t o changet he rules even duringt he cont inuanceof t he Course bya Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 86 1 CWP No8583 of2009 13 st udclltas t he Universit ydoes nOt hold a prom isct o a st udentnot t o changet he durat ion or t he m anner or m et hod of from one sem est ers t o anot her except t he courseof st udyfor wh1cha st udentm ay be ent it ed t o not ice The haI e placedreliance UPOll a Single oft his Court report edPavan KuI nat Shanna Vs The St at e of Puniab and ot hers 1991 39 Recent Services 407 I n t his case t he afflliat ingUniversit y t he condit ionof passingt he cxalninat ions 111 cl chance The st udent s who are t he course at t he t im e of int roduct ionof t he assailedt he act ion of t he Universit y t he issue a learnedSingleBench oft hoisCourt held as followsl I t has beenJaid dowll t he above refened t wo aut horit iest hat t he whicll are t he t im e a st udentt akesadm issionin t heconsolidat edcourse would keepon applying of at ly ainendm ent t ill t lle st udentso adm it t ed t he course I n view of t his t he Were not which were in applyinglllc on l 6 August 1986t o t he st udent swho bad got adm issionin t he BAMS course 111 t he Orst year priort o t llat 1 0 0 C0 I C5 Ct Z t t 08 00 4 7 732 r1 dat e 17 Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 87 c7 1 J CWP N8583 of2009 1 4 Reliance 1S also placedOll anot her Division Bench j udgm entof t his Court in t he case of Munish Kum ar Talwat Vs Thc Vice Chancellor Baba Farid Universit yof Healt h Sciences cm dot hers 2007 2 SR 330 I n t his case also t he rules for BAMS course were am ended The am ended rules adm issiont o final exam inat ionift here 1Srcappear111 t he secolld exam inat ion The t herein had 111 second t houghhe was grant cdadm ission t o t hird sem est er but not pennit t edt o pear 111t he cxam inat ions This Court t he quest ionheld as underl 7 The short lquest iot lt hat requiresdet enninat ion I ll t his case I S whet heort he appclanllis t o be by t he am ended or unim ended Ordinance The t o in t he3 Professionalexaininat ionheld 111 ApreMay2005 I ft he originaldurat ionoft he 3 Professionalhad not beenam ended t he had cleared t he reappearsof t he 2 Professional and on t hat account t here was before hinl t o appear in t he l5nal exallllllat ion which was t hen t o be held I ll Novem bere Decem ber 2005 As per t he appelI ant he 1S sufferingon account of t he wrong t t r 0 0 0 I Z m I 08 00 4r 47 Z t l 6eee Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he am endedOrdinancein his case JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 88 9J CWP Nol1583 of2009 15 9 Sincet he t o be t reat edas t o bat ch of year 2000 as already not iced t he provisionofpara11 would also com e t o his rescue Wben t he t hecourse lle was ent it ledt ot ake posit iont hat he would be t o clear I st and 2 Professlonalby 200 He reallycould not haue any say in Oxlllgt he durat ionof t he 3 by alnendincnl111 t he Ordinanceaft er he had j oinedt he course To rem edysucha sit uat iononlyperhapst heprovislon ofparal l ofOrclinance providedt hat candidat esadm it t edpriort o 2001 will appear ion aft ert wo years of st udyI t can be not icedt hat t lle has st udied wit h t he bat ch in 1 and 2 Professional exam inat ionSn Thus a different durat ion of t he course if being appliedt o sit uat edcandidat es We do not say t hatit anourlt s t o discrim inat ioilbut oparit y need t o be om aoint ainedbet ween sim ilarlysit ualoed candidat esand t hat is wllat is souglltt o be achievedbyOrdinance above We are t husoft he view t hat unam endedOrdinailce would govemt he case oft he and t he provisions j Q 0 C4 I C5 I Z V2 C 4t r 06 r10 t e 72 0 4 t he am ended Ordinance cannot be m ade Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t o him 19 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document e r Wl Nll4583 t I f2009 l I 0 t hc cont ral I Vlr I OS Pat walia I carllcd et I unscl apcarlng for t hc I las relied upt lll I Ulliilb lJi Slllliish handerand anot her 198413 l I lllrl l I SCS 1l1 I ll lllis case I lad secured lt 1 M1313 Ct llllSC I ll t hc ycar 1965 hc exist ing 7v 1 71 A 1 I llllllllllllll 050 per cellt m arkst o 10ilssin each subj cct I 11addlllllll lI llle iI llt lvc lllcrc was a separalculc 101 0l grllCC I lllllk5 Ullt t 1011 PCrcentof t he t ot al aggrcgat ct narksiI lcllidingI llllrk I lll Prlct ical alld illlernal assessm enl il a clidat c fI ils I ll t I I lC t lr I llt lrC I ll t llc ycar l 970 an anlendnlclll WlI S I llildc I ll 1lllci illlll llle 21wardof gracc I llilrks WilS Ct lll l lllcd l1 11I liI l aggcgl1leillarks cxcllidingt he 111ks ft lr it llcril11 I sscsslllclll Whcrc 11 Cllllt lidale ails lll OllC OT I llt lt C sllbj eclsprllvidct lI lc I llls appeircdiil lll sllbj eclswhere a scpilit 1t e 01 pasSlllg aggrcgalcals cxist s I n casc of I 3AMSI BDS exallllllillI t I I l graceI llI rks of OllC perccntW11SCOllflllct llo each sliloj cct11111I llll 1 1 f t aggrcgillct l f ill l subj ccls 11lc pclit it lI lcrwh0 I Vas a sllldclll t l 1 MB135 141218failit lg111t I llc paper lI e cllim cd gracc lllilrk s t lll t lle 11asisl llllillncnded rules but he was 1lwardedgrace I TlarkSt 111lhc 1asis t 11lllc illllcndcd rules which did I le cllallcllgedlhe sam e Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 90 11 CWP N8583 of2009 41 17 OPPlYand t he am endedrules cannot be applied t o t lle det rim entoft he candidat es Honble t he Court while t he 1SSueheld as underl 1 r 0 C I C5 Z m Q 05 OO 3 Z f1 We do not agree wit h t he leam edJudgesoft he Full Bench oft he HighCourt t hatt hereis any elcm eI ltof t he changebroughtabout by t he addit ionof t he t o Rule 1 oft he Calendaifor t he year 1970 t o t he Short er Oxford English Third Edit ion in relat iont o St at ut eset c m eans Operat ivewit h regardt o pastt im e The changebroughtabout by t he addit ion of t he t o Rule 2l does not say t hat it shall be operat ivewit h effect ofrom any earlier dat e I t obviously I t is not possiblet o hold t hatit is oin operat ionm erelybecause t hough int roducedln 1970it was appliedt o SubashChailder l who appearedfor t he final exam inat ionin 1974 aft erhe hadj onedt he course earlier in 1965 No prom ise was m ade orcould be deem ed t o have been t nadet o him at t he t im e of is adm issionin 1965 t hat t here will be no alt erat ionof t he rule or regardt o t he percent ageof m arksrequiredfor passing any exam inaon or award of grace m alrksand t hat t he rules relat ingt heret owhich were in forceat t hc t im e of Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh he finishedhiswhole courseeeeeeeel I l his adm issionwould cont inue t o be appliedt o him unt il JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 91 t 1 CWI No8583 of2009 1 I ll 18 12 Thereforewe are clearlyoft he opiniont hatt here1S of t he changein t he rule m ade in t he year 1970having operat ionlnerelybecause it was appliedin 1974t o SubashChanderwho hadj oined t heMBBS course in 1965whent he rule of grace inarks was different I n t hesecircum st ances we affirm t he Vlew of DlC Mahaj ailand PC Jain JJ in SewaRm in t heDivision 13ench v Kurukshet ra t lle view t aken byt he learned Judgesof t lhc Fuil Bench in t he decision under appealin t his case and hold t hat t he Universit y riglotin holdingt hatSubashChander l was not ent it ledt o 16 grace m arksundcr t he old rule was ent it ledt o only4 grace m arksundcr t lle ncw rule and had t herefore not passedt he exaininat ion 111 We allow t he appealbut wit llout any order as t o cost s Howevert his decisionwil l not affect t he result of t he exaininat ion of Subash Chander lll if it had beendeclaredas peort he direct ionof t he leanledJudgesof t heFull Benchin t lle Lclt ers Pat ent Appea91 m r 0 C I C5 I Z C I 06 CO 1 em o Z t l 9e The aforesaid followed byanot hcrBcnch t he Court oin t he case of Puniab Univcrsit y Vs DevianiChakrabart iand ot hers 6l984 3 CourtCases 612 wherein it has beenheld as followsl Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document m r 0 C I C5 Z m 08 0 4nm Z 0 L 92 1 J CWP No8583 of2009 19 1 1 Ce t he presentcase also t he new decisionsare prlm a facie in operat ionand t hcydid not becom e m erelybecauset hey appliedt o st udent swho hadalready st art edt heir educat ionalcareerSe We t herefore allow t heseappealsbut wit hout anyorder as t o cost s and set aside t he t he High Court and dism isst he writ However t his decisionwill not affect t herightwllicll inight have been grant edt o t he pet it ioncrsin t he writ o pet it ionson t he basis oft hiudgm ent soft he High Court which havebeenreversedn t heseappealsI l A sim ilar issue cam et o be considercd bya Divisioll 13ellcllof t his Court 111t he case of Rahul Guot aVs St at e of Harvana2000 I 9SCT 1099 wherein SubhashChanders case has beenrelied uponand it hasbeen held as underl 4 We haveheardlearned counselfor t he part ies and are of t he View t hat t here is no m erit in t he writ pet it ionsTlle onlyargum entadvancedbyt he counselfor t he pet it ioneris t llat wheonhis client j oinedt he diplom aCOUrse 111t he year 1997 t llC m adeit clear t hat t he durat ionof t hat course was 3 years and t he could I lOt Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he course in t he academ ic session 1997m 98had changet he durat iont il l t he st udent s who j oined JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 93 CWP N8583 of2009 20 C t he sam e He has placedreliance Oll Full Bench of t llis Court in Am ardeelo SinghSahot avSt at eofPuniobct c1993l41SLR 6731 1993 41 SCT 328 P84 Hl Bl and SwaraniitSinghandanot herv St at eofPuniaband ot hers 1998 l21SLR 14 1997 ll SCT 511 038 Hl 3 We are unable t o agree wit h t he cont ent ionof t he From t he st and t aken by t he lt 1S clear t hat t he com pet ent decided in t he year1995t o revise t he curriculuin of Elect ronics and Colninunicat ion Diplom aCourse t o 3e112yearsconsist ingof 7 sem est ers The 7 sem est er includest he t he lnarks awardedt o a candidat elrl t his t raininghave t o be cludeclin t hc awarded t o I t is furt her clear t hat t he Direct or Technical Educat ion I I aryanaby his com m unicat iondat ed 1801995 inform edall t he Principalsof t he I nst it ut esin t he St at eof which im partsuch educat ion t hat t he durat ion of t he course had been increasedt o 3112 years and t hatt he revised curriculum was t o be wit h effect from t he academ ic session 199596 What was t hat whcn t he prospect uswas 1 Q 0 C C5 I Z L Z 06 m WV Z t ln Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh issued for t he academ ic session 199798 t here inadvert enterror t hercin and t he durat ion JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 94 CWP N8583of2009 21 of t he course was shown t o be of 3 years When t his error was not iced t he lOirect or Technical Educat ion Haryanasent anot llcr com m unicat ion t o all t he Principalsof t he I nst it ut es educat ion in Elect ronics and Com m unicat ion DiploinaCourset hatt herevisedcurriculumwas t o wit h effect from t he acadeinic seSS1011 199596 This is not a clurat ionof t he course The casc where t he m idest eam durat ion of t he course had alreadybeen increasedt o 3112 years in t he year 1995and t he is onlyt ryingt o t akc of t he errort hat creptin t he oft he prospect us for t he academ icsession 1997e98 We are furt her of t he view t hat even aft cr t he com m enceinent of t he course which was earlicr3 ycarsit was open t o t hecom pet ent t o changet he durat ionby t he Rules as has beenobservedbyt heir Lordshipsof t he Suprem eCourt lll Panj ab v SubashChander and anot herAR 1984SC 1415 When a course a periodof 3 years com m encesand t he st udent s j oint hat course t he aut llorilles m ake 110 prOm lSe t hat t here would be no alt erat iorl of t he durat ion andt hat t he Rules in regardt heret owlch were forceat t he t iine of adinissionwould cont inue t o JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document m 0 0 0 I C5 I e I c8 OO a7 e 6a Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 95 CWP N8583 of2009 e22e be appliedunlil t he whole course 1S Onished I n t he case beforeus as alreadyobservedt herewas Olllyan error 111t he of t he prospect us Oll t hebasisofwhich t he presentpet it ionhasbeen filed We are sat islledt hut t he durat ionof t he course had been ext endcd t o e112 years 7 sem est crs even before t he Pet ioonerj oinedt he sam e m at t er t he pet it ionerwllo has cleared t he 6 I n t his view of t he sem est er exam inat iondid i101becom eeligiblefor adm issiont o t he COUrSC I e is yet t o t he t raining111t he 7 Sernest er and t he m arksobt ainedby hiin in t hat t raining would be t aken int o account beforet he diplom a1S awardedt o hiinpI l Anot her Division Bench of t his Court l in t he case of AkashdeepBhargoand ot hersVs Baba EaridUniversit vof Halt h Scicnces and ot hers 2007 2J SCT 139 has observed as 1 0 C I C Z 2 r Z CQ Z Ll foI lowSl t 6e 10 The fact s as not iced abovc clearlyshow t he had becI l adm it t edI ll BAMS course in t he College Noll i11 t he year 2000 and at t hat pointof t iinc t he said collegewas aft lliat ed wit h Guru Nwlak Dev Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Farid of Healt h Sciences t he said Universit ybut lat er on Oll const it ut ion of Babo JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 96 1 4J CWP No8583 of2009 23 m r 0 0 C5 I C Z m Q X 06 OQ 1 m Z 0 4 collegecam e t o be afflliat oedwit h Baba Farid Ulliversit yin March 2001 For a periodof som e t iine t he old of Guru Nanak Dev were m ade t o t he st udent swho were aireadyadm it t ed but lat er Oll Baba Farid it s of Ht h Sciencesfram ed The clecisioll t aken on 13 2001 has alreadybeen ext ract ed above The said decisionsshows t hat onlyt he st udent sadm it t edpriort o 2000 were t o be govenledby old The Pet it ionershavecoont inuedwit h t heirst udiesunder t he new of Baba Farid Theyhave appearcdin t heir BAMS exam inat ion held 111 t lle m ont h of MaylJune2006 I n t hese circuinst ances t he and ordinanccsof 13aba Farid at t he t iine of t he exam inat ionare t o govern t he case of t he pet it ioners Concededly t hc ordinances of Baba Farid Uniwrsit y do not cont ain any provisionof grace lllarks as clouned byt he pet it ionersThe cannot cloim t o have acquiredany vest cd right sm erelyOll Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t hey were account of t he fact t hat at t he t im e of adm ission govem edby Guru Nanak Dev JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 97 1 CWP No8583 of2009 24 Universit y We do not flnd t hat t he gnevance m ade by t he t hat a has bcen givent o t he ordinanceof Baba Farid Univcrsit yis j ust ified As a m at t er of fact t lle CaSC I ll hand is coveredbyt he Subash Chanderscase oft hc Court I ll I n view of t he dlct um of t he aforesaid oft he FI onble Court in t he cases of SubashChanders supra Hawaldar Singhssupral and t wo Division Benches t his Court 111 Rahul Gupt aand Bhargoscases supra9t he int roduct ionof t he carryon syst emcannot be said t o 111 operat ionso longit was appliedt o t he exam inat ionsheld aft er cawy Oll syst emSo applied The are not at all ent it led t o invoke eit her t hc doct rine of est oppelor t he I t has been cont endedOI l behalf of t he t hat 1 L 0 0 I C5 e Z w 4r Z 06 I lO e 2 t wo nam elySim ranj itKaur aindAm it Bhardwajwho em W had also flled writ have been t o llppcar in t he sem est ers exam inat ions aft er t he writ wit hdrauln Vide order dat ed Ol022010 passedby t his Court MrPat walia asked t o file an affidavit 111 t his regard Affidavit has been filed Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 98 CWP No8583 of2009 e25 I n t he aforesad affldavit of t he about declarat ion of result of t hree candidat esnam edabove who wit hdrcw t he writ t o t he next scm est cr halle been adm it t ed I t 1S st at ed 111 t he affidavit fllcd by t he t he Guru Nanak Dev t hat t he m a1t er rclat ingt o cany Oll syst elllwas considered by t he Com lnit t ee const it ut edbyt he ViceeChancellor on 31072008 Tlle Com m t t ee not iced t hat since t he posit ionwit h regardt o t he unifonn t he carry on syst em was not clcar but cert ain ineligiblepersonsha11ebeenadm it t edunder cany on syst em I t is furt her not iced t hat were received from t he st udent s from various I n of t he carryon syst em respectt o ineligiblecandidat eswho were adm issions Under t hc carry Oll syst enl lt was t o t he t o conccrned aut horit iest o givet hem a specialchance lt is furt her m ent ioned t llaton receiptofsuch requestfrom t he candidat cs t heir cases adm issionwill be consideredlll specialt erm s A copy of t he decisioonof t he Colnm it t ee 1S also enclosed alongwit h t he afOdavit inent ionedin t hc affidavit t hat lnvlew of t he aforesaid decision t he candidat eswho wit hdrew t heir writ pet it ionswere given specialchancet o clear t he flrst and second 1 0 C I C Z t 0 C c5 CLl t e 422 0 sem est erspapers along wit h 7 and 8 scom est ers Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 99 CWP N8583 of2009 V e26 t hey were grant edadm issions t o 7 and 8 sem est ers Even aft er t hese writ pet it ionswere reserved for SOm e havebeeonfiled on bchalf of SOm e of t he writ t o wit hdrew from t he writ pct it ion t o t akebenefit oft he own decision I t is also t o not e t hat t he decision of t he grat ingrclaxat ion was not circulat ed lI l all t he and has been appliedm a select ive way The had 110 of such a decision and t hus t heycould not even applyseckingt llc benet of t he decision I t is a m at t erof concem for t ls Couot tt o not e t hat sim ilarlysit uat edwrlt who have wit hdrawn t heir writ haI e been relief and t he presentwrit have becn deniedt he benefit wit hout any I awfuland valid reasons Even t hought he carry Oll syst emunder challenge111 t he plCSCntwrit pet it ionsdeservcsno int erference111Vlew oft he law laid down by t he ApexCourt in Puniab Universit v Vs SubhashChander and anot her and Puniab Universil Chandiarh Vs Dcviani Chakrabat t iand ot hers6supranor it can be said t hat t he decision t o int roduce cany on syst em m id course 1S I wever t he fact rem auls t hat t he m Q 0 3 I C5 Z a I CQ 4t t a7 f1 111it s wisdom chose t o grant special chance 10 Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh ineligiblecandidat cs for clearingflrst and second sem est er JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 400 ClVPNo85830f2009 0 1 27 exam inat ionsand were also grant edadm ission t o 7 sem est ers wit hout clearingt he backlogpapersThis decision has beenapplied and not This act ion of t he Universit yis in law and is an CXCrClSC of power deservesnppreciat ion The Ulliversit yaS all I nst it ut ion has t o act ln an m anner t o all The Act ion oft he Universit ydo not suggeslSt Som eof t he sit uat ed candidat esI lavebeen t hc benet oI specialchance and adm issionst o t he highersem est ers despit ct heir under t he cany on ot hcrshI e been deniedsim ilar relief I n view of t he above circum st ances t hc Cat loI lOtbe t reat ed and wit h Theyshall also be ent it ledt o t he specialchance grant edt o ot her sim ilarI sit uat ed st udent sfor clearingt he papersof first and second sem est ers on uniform pat t ern Their rightt o adm ission t o 718 sem est ers cannot be denied t o t hem These 1 C 0 C I C5 I Z t C6 m 2 I w allowed in t he followingm annerl i Such of t he who have 1101availed specialchance for clcaringfirst and secondsem est ers rerlppear will be provided specialchancefor t he purpose adm issions grant edt o t he t o 718 undert he int erim ordersoft his Court shall st and Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh sem est ers JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document j CWP No8583 of2009 v m 28e iio result of t he who have I ll 7I sI ll sem est ersexam inat ions shall be declarec t hose who have been denied adm issionsin sem est ers Oll account noneclearanceof secondlt hird sem est ers exam inat ionsshall be grant edadm issiont o 718 sem est ers as t he case m ay be and on of t he course t heir result shall be declared v1 t hls relaxat ion shall be avaoilablet o all st udent swho hae reached7t h18senest ers upt oacadem icsession 200920 10 Or t ill such llim et he decision oft he t akenvide lelt er Nt o737 DAA dat edOl 082008 shall relnalll lt l is however opent o t lle t o applyt he carry Oll Syst emt o t he disciplnescovered by carry Oll syst eln bY t o t he st udent s 08042010 BLS 1 Se PERMOD KOHLI I JUDGE Whet hert o bc refcnled10 t he L YES C 0 0 I C I Z r S 1 2C t ll 2 0 1 V4 1 eeI C0 e eP11 t 1511 Cv3 9017 Gupt a Suruchi 2014.03.28 15: 17 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document