Court ofPuno v. GuruNanak Dev Universit yaild anot her

st udentfroin first sem est er t o second sem est er b9However a st uden shall be pronlot edloot llircl sem est er only if he has passedat least 500I o of t he first t wo sem eslers but t here will be no condit ionlfor prolnot inga st udcntfrolll t hird sem est er t o fourt h sem est er C 9However a st udentshall be prom ot edt o flAlh sem est er Ollly if he has passedat leost 50 oft he flrst four sem est cr d1 There wiil be I lO condit ion for st udentfromflAh t o sixt h seinest er a e9 However a st udent shall be pronlot edt o sevent h sem est er only if he has passcclall t he oft he flrstt wo sem est ers 0 The st udent shall be prom ot edt o eight h seinest er only if has passedall t he oft he first t llree senlest ers AAer a periodof eight hsem est ers t he st udent shall be givena periodof t wo consecut ive years m ore t o pass failingwhich he shall have t o st art t llc course 1 r 0 C I C5 I Z m C I 06 rQ 4r e n Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh afresh from t he 6rst sem est er llowever such a JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 98 We CWP No4583 of2009 e8 st udentwill not be t o qualifyt he ent rance t est agaln ll The aforesaidOrdinances ny on syst em lwas furt her am endedby t he 111lt s m eet ingheld on 13122006 I I l t hefollowingI nanner Presentlleadit ll ProloosedHeading ii Carry Oll Syst einfor variousiil Carry Oll for various sem est er exam inat ions exceptlaw sem est er exam inat lollS 6exceptLaw Facult ies and School of Sociall Iand Facult ies and School of Social Sciences Vide t he am endm ent t he cany Oll syst emfor vanous sem est erex1uninat ionswas m ade t o t lle and TechnologyFacult ies as well exceptLaw and School of Social Sciences However t he am endm entwas appliedfrom Session 20072008 llhe Universit yfurt her int roducedt he am et ldm eilt lll t he cany on syst emof B Tech M Tech I vI CA and MBA 5 yearscourse vide it s decision dat ed 18 2 008 t he carry Oll syst em was applied111 all t he exceptLaw and Schoolof Social Sciencesfor which t hereare separat eOrdinances 1 t r 0 0 I C5 I 4 Z t r 1c c t ll r n7 1 07 e Vide t he aforesaid decision t he carry Oll syst em was m ade t o t he Com put erSciencec and Elect ronic by way of furt her clariflcat ion of t he am endm ent int roducedvide I t em Nol3 111t he ineet ingof t he on 05122006 The of t he decision dat ed Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Ol082008 t he am endedOrdinancesGoverningt he cany JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 99 C V0 CWPN08583 of2009 e9 on syst emhas been appliedt o all t he coursesrefened t o herem inaboveAs a consequenceoft hc of calTy on syst ema st udentcan be from first sem est er t o second sem est er wit hout any condit ion Hwever such a st udentCall be t o t hird sem est er if he has passedat least 50 per cent of t he First t wo sem est ers For t o 4 sem est er no condit ion lS applicableAgainfoi pronlot lOllt o sem est er a st udentm ust pass at least50 per cenli t he first four sem est ers Againfor lrom 5 t o 6 sem cst er ls Wit llout any condit ion For t o 7t hsem est er a furt her em bargolS crealt ed t hat t he st udent nu st pass all oft he flrst t wo sem est ers t o 8 sem est ers a st udentm ust quafy all t he oft he first ot hree t hereby a st udent will not be eligiblet o seek adm ission in 7 sem est er ifhe has any reappearor backlogof first t wo selnest ers Sam e eligibilit y condit ion wil applyfor t o 8 sem est er and if t e st uclcnt has a reappearOl backlogof first t hreesem est ers he is inelgiblet o seek adm isslOll1118 sem est er The grievanceof t he lS t hat t he anlendm ent inUoduced or t he clarificat ion issued vide order dat edOl 082008 1 0 0 I C9 I Z Q eL ot j cQ 4 47 2 0 n I S illegaland lll cases of t he t o supportt heir cont ent ion reliance is pI acedon Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Wit h a view t he Ordinance JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 400 r CWP No8583 of2009 10e dat ed 14112000 Pm l which was 111force at t he t ilne of am ission which onlyrequired40 per cent aggregat cm arksof all t he papers ln a selnest er of t he fact whet her a st udentfails ln one or m ore papersof t hat sem est ers I is furt her cont ended t hat carry Oll int roduccd in t he Calendar 1999 Vol I I has no 10 t he and TechnologyFacult ies Law and School of Social Sciencesas 1S evidentOom Annexure I 3 13vent he at nendlnent int roducedpursuantt o t he decision of t he vide I 1em No3 lI l t he held on 5 122006 cany on syst emfor t he Facult ies has been from Session 20072008 I t is subnt ed t hat Slnce t he adm it t ed 111 t he year 2005 t his am endm entis agalll not t o t he halingbeen m ade froln Scssion 20072008 as per t lle cont ained in t he am endm entOrdinances it sclf I t lS furt hercont endedt hat vide order dat edOl 082008 lnnexure PI herein t he am endm enthas been applied which has affect ed t he career t he Accordingt o t he I eam edcounsel for t he had t he known t hat t heywould be requiredt o clear all t hc 1 C 0 C I C5 Z m r1 r 08 Ct l e 7 2 0 of first 213sem est ers t lleywould halve concent rat ed on t llose papers 011 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Now aft er t wo years t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document m 0 0 C5 I Z r t r ot j CQ 1 2 Ll 401 r CWPNo8583of2009 11 cannot be for 110thavingcleared t he paperst wo years I t oist he case t he t hat t he of t he rules is when it t akes away any of t he rightof t he hit her t o available 111 exist ingst at ut ellaw t o t he t he only t o t he seven and eight hsem est ers was t hat a candidat eshouldsecure 40 per cent m arksin aggregat cm a sem est er of t he fact whet hera candidat ehas failed lll one or m ore oft he papersoft hat sem est er ln t he oreplyflled by t he t he Unillersit yhas relied upon t he order dat ed Ol082008 whereby carry on 111 has been appliedt o all t he courses t he Universit yexceptLaw and School of Social Sciences Theset wo courses being by separat eOrdinances I t lS reit erat edt hat any having I ll t he flrst t wo sem est ers is ineligiblefor seekingadlnission t o sem est er and a candidat ehavingoreappearin flrst t llrec sem est ers lS t o seek adlnission in 8 sem est er I t is st at cdt hat as a m at t er of fact order dat edOl 082008 1S not an am endm entt o t he but onlyby way of clarificat ion as previousOrdinances of 2000 were in t his regardand t hus necessit at eda clarificat ion I t is m ent ioned in t he replyfiled by t he Universit y t hat som e Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he who had reappear JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 402 Ol f CWP No8583 of2009 12 exam inat ions on fi rst t wo sem est ers were m 0 0 C5 Z m t r t 341 08 lt l 1 e l7 G adm issiont o 7 sem est er subj ectt o clearanceoft he backelogoft he first t wo sem est ers Oll t heir filingof t he affidavit t llat in t he event of t he failure of t he candidat et o clear t he reappear of first t wo t he adm ission t o 7 sem est er could be cancelled Sim ilar affidavit s were filed by t he securedadm ission I ll 8 sem est er while I ll flrst t hree I t issubm it t ed t hat allt he adm issionst o 7and 8 sem est ers in respectt o t hecandidat eswho had of first 213sem est ers Were 111nat ureand could be cancclled Oll t heir failure t o clear t he baclolog When t hese flled int erim orders were by t his Court in CWP No8583 of 2009 on 29052009 ent ryin 8 sem est er Sim ilar orderswere passedin ot her writpet it ions t he t o seek adm issoionin 7 and 8 senlest ers ancl also t o appear I ll t he exam oinat ionsfr0111t im e t o t lll MrOS Pat walia learned counsel for t he has however arguedt hat neit her t he Ordoinances carryingon syst emare in nat UrC I lor t he order dat ed Ol 082008 can be const rued t o haI e His furer cont ent ionis t hat t he is ent it led t o changet he rules even duringt he cont inuance oft he Course bya Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document j 0 0 I C I Z 2 1X I 06 Cll 1 7 2 O 403 vlC CWP No8583 of2009 en13 st udentas t he doesnot holda prom iset o a st udentnot t o changet he durat ion or t he m anner Or m et llod of proinot ions from one sem est ers t o anolher except t he a courseofst udyfor which a st udentm ay be ent it lcdt o not ice The have Fed reliance upoll a Single Bench j udgm entoft his Court report edPawan Kum ar Sharm a Vs The St at e of Puniab and ot hers 1991 Recent Services 407 I n t his case t he byeI aws t he condit ion of passingt he exam inat ions lll a part icularchance The st udent s who are t he course at t he t ilne of int roduct ionof t he assailed t he act ion of t he leaornedSingleBench oft his Court held as follows t he issue a I t has beenlaid down in t he aboverelfet oredt wo aut horit iest hat t he which aore at t he t im e a st udentt akes adI nissionI ll t he consolidat edcourse would keepon applyiilg irrespect iveof any am endm ent t ill t he st udentSO adm it t ed com plet est he course ln view of 1111S t he were not j ust ieclin t lpplyingt he whicll were on 16 August 1986 t o t he st ident s who had got adinissionint he BAMS course 111 t he first year prior t o t hat dat e 35 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 404 4 CWP No8583 of2009 1 4 1 1 Relance 1S also placedOll anot her Division Bencll of t his Court in t he case of Munish Kum ar Talwar Vs The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid Universit yof Healt h Sciences and ot hers 2007 62LR 330 ln t hI Scase also t he rulcs for BAMS course am ended The am ended rules adm issiont o flnal exam lnat lOI l ift here t he second exam inat ion The pet it ionert herein had reppearm second t houghhe was admissioll t o t hird sem est er but not t o appear in t he exam inat ions This Court t he held as under 7 The short t hat requiresdet erm inat ion t his case is whet her t he is t o be by t he alnended or Ordinance The had been t o in t he 3 Professionalexam inat ionheld lll 2005 I ft he originaldurat ionoft he 3 Professionalhad not been am endedt he had cleared t hereappearsof t he 2 Professional and on t hat account t here was im pedi m enl before hiin t o appear in t he 8nal exam inallon which was t hen t o be held in NI em ber 1 C 0 0 C I 0 Z W 0 I 08 OO Z t l 4e Decem ber2005 As per t lle sufferingon account of t he wrong t heam endedOrdinancein his case he 1S JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 405 t v CWPN85830f2009 15 9 Slncet he t o be t reat edas belongingt o bat ch of year 2000 as already not icedt he provisionofpara11 would also com e t o his rescue When t he t he course he was ent it ledt o t ake t hat he would be eligiblet o clear lst and 2 Professionalby 2005 He reallycould ilOt have any say 111flxlllgt he durat ion of t he 3 t he by am endinentin Ordinanceaft er he hadj oinedt he course To sucha sit uat iononly t he provision of para 11 of Ordinance providedt hat candidat esadm it t edpriort o 2001 will appear lll aft ert wo yearsof st udyI t Call be not icedt hat t he has st udiedwit h t he bat ch ln 1 and 2 Professional exanlinat lOllSe Thus a cferent durat ion of t he course if being t o sim ilarlysit uat edcandidas We do not say t hat it ainount s t o discrim inat ionbut parit y needt o be inaint ained bet ween sim ilarlysit uat ed candidat esand t hat is what is soughtt o be achievedbyOrdinance above We are t husoft he view t hat unam cndedOrdinancewould governt hecase oft he appelantandt he provisions e 0 0 I C5 I Z m I 08 en7 Z t l c t he am ended Ordinance cannot be m ade Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t o him 99 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 406 4 CWP No583 of2009 16 V To t he cont rary Mr DS Pat walia learned counsel appeanng for t he has relied upoil PuniabUniversit y Vs SubashChander and anot herl 98413 Court Cases 603 ln t his caset he had securedadm issiont o MBBS COurse t he year 1965 The exist ing required llllllllllUln of 50 per cent m arkst o pass in each subj ectI n addit ion t o t he above t here was a rule for grantof goracenarks upt oOne of t he t ot al aggregat em arksincludingm arksfor Pract icaland int ernalassessm ent if a candidat efails in one or m ore n t heyear 1970 an am endm entwas m adein t he rules and t he award of grace m arks was confined t o t ot al m arks Where exciudingt he lnarks for int ert lal assessm ent a candidat efails ln one or m ore he has 111all subj ect swhere a separat e of passing also exist s I n case of BAMSI BDS exam inat ion t he gracelnarks of one percentwas confinedt o each subj ectand not t o aggregat eof all subiect s The pet it ionerwho was a st udentof 1 1 0 0 I C5 I Z m C 4t 06 C1O 7 Cle MBBS was failing111one paperHe claim ed grace m arks on t he basisofuram ended rules but he was awardedgracem arkson t he A basisof t he am endedrules which did not prove beneficialt o him He t be sam e in t he Punj aband HaryanaI lirh C4I ui1I Full Bench oft his Court allowed t he writ pct l41r1 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh at t hc t int c i4 a1 1i JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 407 1 Vl 1 CWP N8583 of2009 17 applyand t he am endedrules cannot be applied t o t he det rim entoft he candidat es Honble t he Court whe t he 1SSUCheld as under j I r 0 0 C I Z m r I 08 QO 1 2 Z m 4 11 We do not agree wit h t he I earnedJudgesoft hc Full Bench oft he I I ighCourt t hatt hereis any clelnent of 111 t he changebroughtabout by t he addit ionof t he t o Rule 2 l of t heCalendarfor t he year 1970 accordingt o t he Short er Oxford EnglishDict ionaryThird Edit ion in relat iont o St at ut eset c m eans Operat ivewit h regardt o pastt im e The changebroughtabout by t lhe acldhion of t he t o Rule 2 does not say t llat it shall be wit h elYect from any earlier dat e I t I S obviously I t is not possiblet o hold t hat it is ret rospect t ve111 operat iont nerelybccause t hough int roducedin 1970 it was appliedt o SubashChander 1 who appearedfor t he flnal exalninat ion lll 1974 aft er he hadj oinedt he course ealrlierit l 1965 No prom ise was m ade or could be deem edt o have becn m ade t o him at t he t im e of his adm issiOlllll 1965t hat t here will be no alt erat ion of t he rule or regulat ionlt l regardt o t he percent ageof m arks requiredfor passing anyexam inat ion or award of goracem arks and t hat t he rules relat ingt heret owhich were in forceat t he t im e of Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh he Onishedhiswholecourseeee0009 99 his adm ission would cont inue t o be appliedt o hiin unt il JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 408 1 CWPNc08583of2009 1 1 2 Thereforewe are clearlyoft he opliliollt llat t hereis 110 1970 of t he changein t he rule inode in t he year m erclybecause it in 1974t o SubashCllanderwho llad j oined t heMBBS coursein 1965when of grace inarkswas different ln t hesecircum st ances we afflrm t he Vlew of D1C Mallaj anand PC Jain JJ in Sewa Ram in t he DivisionBench Ve Universit yand t lle view t aken t he learned Judgesoft he Full Bench in t he decision under appealin t his case and hold t hal t he Universit y rightin holdingt hat SubashChander l was not ent it ledt o 16 grace m arksunder t he old rule was ent it ledt o only4 grace m al4csundcr t hc ncw rule and had t herefore not passedt lle exam inat ion in We allow t he appea but wit hout anyorder as t o cost s Howevert his decision will 1101affect t he resultof t he exaininat ion of Subash Chander in if it hadbeendeclaredas per t he direcllonof t helearnedJudgesoft he Full Bencll in t he Let t ersPat ent Appea99 W 0 0 I C0 I Z 0 4Cr r 08 CO 4 Z a 4 The aforesaid followedbyanodlerBench t he Suprem eCourt 111 t he case Puniab Universit y ChaldarhVs DevianiChakrabart iand ot hers 61984 3 CourtCases 612 wherein it has been held as follows Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 409 1 CWP No8583 of2009 9 t he presentcase also t he new dccisions Ore prlm a facle lllld t heydid not becom e m erelybecauset hey appliedt o st udent swllo had already st art ed t heir educat ionalcareers We t herefore allow lhese appealsbut wit hout any order as t o cost s and set aside t he t hc High Court ancl doisinisst he writ pet it ionsHowever t his decisionwill not affectt he rightwhicll t night have beeil grant edt o t he in t lhewnt pet it ionson t he basis oft he High Court which have been reversedin t heseappealsI l Asim ilar issue calne t o be considered by a Division Bench of t hs Court 111 t he case of hul Gupt aVs St at e of Harvana2000 49SCT suprahasbeen relied uponand it has 1099 wherein SubhashChanders case beenheld as under 1 C 0 0 I C5 I Z 1 08 OO e Z 0 4 We have heard learnedcouilsel for t he part ies and are of t he view t hat t here is no m erit in t he writ pet it ionsThe onlyargum entadvancedbyt he counsel for t he pet it ioneris t lhat when his client j oinedt he diploinacourse t he year 1997 t lle m ade it clear t hat t he durat ionof t hat course was 3 yearsand t he could not Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he course ln t he academ ic session 199798 had changet he dut at ion t ill t he st udent s who j oined JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 410 r CWP N8583 of2009 20 t he sam e H has plucedrelianceon Full Bench of t his Court in Ainardeep SinploSahot av St at eofPuniabet c 1993 ll SLR 673 1993 SCT 328 Pe H 31 and SwaraniitSinahandanot herv St at cofPuniaband ot hers 1998 21SLR 1411997 l41 SCT 511 P 8 Hl FB We are unable t o agree wilh t he cont ent ioll of t he pet it ionerFrom t he st and t aken by t he lS clear t hat t he coinpet ent decidedin t he year 1995 t o revise t he curriculum of Elect ronics and Com m unicat ion Diplom aCourse t o 3eel12 years senest ers of 7 The 7 sem est er includest he t rainingand t he lnarks awardedt o a candidat e 111 t his t raininghave t o be includcd in t hc diplom a awarded t o I t is furt her clear t hat t he Direct or Technical Educat ion Haryanaby his com m unicat iondat ed18101995 inform ed allt he Principalsof t he I nst it ut esin t lle St at eof HI ana which im partsuch educat ion t hat t he durat ion of t he course had been increased t o 3112 years and t hat t he revised curriculum was t o be wit h effect from t he academ ic session 199596 Hhat was t hat when t he prospect uswas Q 0 C I C5 I Z C I 08 Ct O 4te 2 t l Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh issued for t he academ ic session 199798 t herc was an inadvert ent error t herein and t he durat ion JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 411 1 CWPN85830f2009 m 21 of t he course was shown t o be of 3 years When t his error was not iced t he Dlrect or Technical Educat ion Haryanasent anot llercoinm unicat ion t o all t he Principalsof t he I nst it ut es im pwt ing educat ionin Elect ronics ancl Com m unicat ion Courset hat t herevised curriculum was t o wit h e0ect froin t he academ ic sessloll 199586 This is not a case where t he durat ionof t he course The m idest ream durat ion of t he course had alreadybeen increasedt o 3112yearsint he year 1995 and t he is onlyt ryingt o t ake of 1he errort hat creptin t hepuicat ionoft he prospect us for t he academ icsession199798 We are fult her oft he viewt hat even aft ert he com m encem ent of t lle course which was earlier3 years it was open t o t hecom pet entaut horit yt o changet he durat ionby t he Rules as has been observedbyt heir t he Suprem eCourt in Panj ab v SubashChanderand anot her AR 1984SC 1415 When a course st ret chingover a periodof 3 years com m encesand t he st udent s j oint hat course t he aut horit ies inake no proinise t hatt here would be no alt erat lionof t he durat ion andt hat t lle Rules in regardt hcret o which were forceat t he t im e of adinissionwould cont inue t o JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document m Lr 0 0 I C40 I Z m I c41 QO 7 3 CL 4nn Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 412 r CWP No583 of2009 m 22e be appliedunt il t he wholc coursc is flnished ln t he case beforeus as alreadyobscrved t herewas Olllyan error 0111t he publicat ionof t he prospect us Oll t he basisof which t hepresentpct it ionhasbeen filed We are sat isfled t hat t lle durat ionof t he course had been ext ended t o 3 12 years 7 sem est ers even before t he pet it ionerj oinedt he sam e ln t his view of t he m at t er t he pet it ionerwho has cleared t he 6 seinest er exanlI ilat lOll did rt ot becom eeligiblefor adm issiont o t he course 14eis yet t o t heinplantt raininglll t he 7 Set nest er and t he m arks obt ainedby him it l t hot t raining would be t akeil int o account beforet hediplom alS awardedt o him I l Anot her Division Bench of t his Court in t he W 0 0 I C5 I Z m Cl I 06 OO e e7 AkashdeeoBhargoand ot hersVs Baba Farid UnivershyIofI 4ealt h Sciences and ot het 2007 SCT 139 has observed as follows 10 The fact s as not iced above clearlyshow t hat t he pet it ionershadbeen adm it t cdin BAlvlS course in t he College No3 in t he year 2000 and at t hat pointof t im e t llc said collegewas affiliat ed wit h Guru Nanak Dev Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Universit ybut I at er on on const it ut ion of Baba Farid Universit yof Healt h Sciences t he said JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 413 86 CWPN8583of2009 23 collegecam e t o be afflliat ed wit h Baba Farid in March 2001 For a periodof som e t iI ne t he old of Guru Nanak Dev Universit ywere m ade t o t he st udent swho were alreadyadI noit t edbut lat er Oll I 3abaFarid Universit yof I I ealt hSciencesfrained it s t aken The decision 13 2001 has alreadybeen ext ract edabove The said decisionsshows t hat onlyt he st udent sadm it t edpriorlo 2000 were t o be by old The have cont inuedwit h t heir st udiesuilder t he new of Boba Farid They have in t heir final BAMS exaininat ion held in t he inont ll of MaylJune2006 I n t hese circum st ances t he and ordinances of Baba Farid operat iveat t he t im e of t he exam inat ioll are t o govcrn t he case of t he pet it ioners Concededly t he ordinances of Baba Farid Universit ydo not o cont ainany provisionof grace m arks as clait ned byt he pet it ionersThe cannot clailn t o have acquiredany vest ed right s m erelyOll m 0 0 C I C5 I Z a Cr Ct L 06 Ct l t 3 1 3 0 e Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t hey were accountof t he fact t hat at t he t im e of adm issiot l by Guru Nanak Dev JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 414 1 CWP No8583 of2009 24 We do not Ond t ha1 t he gnevance m ade by t he pct it loilers t hat a has been givent o t he ordinanceof Baba Faricl is j ust ificd As a m at ler of fact t he case 10I lht I lldlS coveoredbyt lle SubashChanders of t lle Court I ll case 6supraI l I n view oft he dict um oft he Honble Suprem eCourt lll HawaldarSinghs6supra and t wo Division Benclles t he cases of SubashChanders 6supral t his Court lrl Rahul Gupt aand Bhargoscases supra9t he int roduct ionof t he carry on syst emcannot be said t o 111 So long it was appliedt o t he exam lllat ions held aRer carry Oll syst emSo applied The are not at all ent it led t o invoke eit her t he doct rine of est oppelor t he 1 t r 0 C I C5 I Z e r 06 10 e7 3 I t has been cont endedon behalf of t he t hat t wo nam elySim ranj itKaur and Am it Bhardwajwho a had also flled writ pet it ionshave been t o appcar in t he sem est ers exam inat ions af1er t he writ pet it ionswere wit hdrawn Vide order dat ed OlO22010 passedby t his Court MrPat walia asked t o 81e an affldavit 111 t his regard 1 Affidavit hasbeen flled Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 415 t 11 1 d CWP No8583 of2009 25 I n t he aforesaid affidavit of t he m Q 0 C C5 I Z e C 7 C6 1 e t l about declarat ion of result of t hree candidat esnam ed above who wit hdrew t he writ pet it ionsand t o t he next sem est er have been adm it t ed I t I S st at ed lll t he affldavit filed by t he t he Guru Nanak Dev Universit yt hat P t he m at t er relat ingt o carry Oll syst emwas considered by t he Com m it t ee const it ut edbyt he Vicem Chancelloron 31072008 The Com m it t ee not iced t hat Slnce t he posit ionwit h regardt o t he uniforlll t he carry on syst em was not clear but cert aill ineligiblepersonshave been adm it t edunder cany on syst em I t lS fllrt her not iced t hat received from t he st udent s froln various oft he carryon syst em I n respectt o ineligiblecandidat eswho were grant edadinisslOllS under t he carry on it was t o t he t o concerned aut horit iest o givet hem a specialchance I t is furt her m ent ioned t hatol ofsuch requestfrom t he candidat es t heir cases adm ission will be considered 111 specialt ernls A copy of t he decision of t he Colnm it t ee lS also enclosed aloilg wit h t he aft ldavit I m ent ionedin t he affidavit t hat I ll Vlew of t he aforesaid decision t he candidat eswho wit hdrew t hciorwrit pet it ionswere given specialchancet o clear t he flrst ald second sem est erspapers along wit h 7 and 8 selnest ers Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 416 CWPNo8583 of2009 m 26e t hey were grant edadm issit I t lSt o 7 ancl 8 sem est ers Even aft er t hese writ pet it ionswerc rcserved for j udgm entsom e have been filed on bchalf of som eof t he writ t o wit hdrew from t he Writ pet it ionobviously t o t ake benefit of t he Universit ysOW11decision I t is also t o not e t hat t he decision of t he grat ingrelaxat ion was not circulat ed 111 al t he and has a select ive way The had no of such a decisionand t hus t heycould not even applyseekingt hc benefit of I t is a m at t er of COI lCem I fort his Court t o not e t hat t he decision sim ilarlysit nat edwrit pet it ionshave been grant edrelief and t he who have wit hdrawn t heir wnt presentwnt havebeendenied t he beneflt wit houtany lawful and valid reasonSe Even t hought he carry on syst em undeorchallengelll t he presentwnt pet it ionsdeservesno int erferencein view of t lle I aw laid down by t he Apex Court 111 Puniab Universit y Vs SubhashChander and anot herand PuniabUniversit vChandigarh Vs DevianiChakrabart iand ot hers supralnor it can be said t hat t he decisioont o int roduce on syst em m id course Howevcr t he fact rem ains t hat t he 1 0 0 I 4 C Z m l Cr I 08 Oll t 7 0 Universit yln lt s wisdom chose t 0 grant special chance t o Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh ineligiblecandidat es for clearingflrst and second sem est er JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 417 4 CWP No8583 of2009 27 exam inat ions and were also grant edadm issiont o 7 and 8 sem est ers wit hout clearingt he backlogpapersThis decision has been appliedselect ivelyand not This act ion of t he Universit yis in I aw and is an arbit rat yexerclse of powerdeservesno appreciat The Universit yas all I nst lt ut ion has t o act in an nonrbit rarym anner providingequal t o all The Act ion oft he Universit ydo not suggestSO Som eof t he sim ilarlysit uat ed candidat eshave been grant edt he benefltof specialchanceand adm issionst o t he highersem est ers t heir ineligibilit yunder t he carry on syst emwhereas ot hershave been clenicdsim ilar relief I n view of t he above circum st ances t he cannot be t reat eddifferent lyand wit h host ilit yTheyshall also be ent it led t o t he specialchance grant edt o ot her sim ilarlysit uat ed st udent sfor clearingt he papers of f1rsl and second seinest ers Oll unifonn pat t em Theiorrightt o adm issoiont o 718 sem est ers cannot be denied t o t hem These t 0 C I C I Z a a c8 QO e4 7 e 11 e6ee allowed in t he followingm anner i Such of t he who have not availed specialchailce for clearingOrst and second reappear will be provided specialchancefor t he purpose i il adm issions grant edt o t he t o 718 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh under t he int erim ordersoft his Court shall st and selneslers JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document J CWP No8583 of2009 28 iio result of t he who have lll 718t h sem est ersexam inat ions shall be declared t hose who have beendeniedadm issionslll 718 sem est ers account nonclearance of secondlt llird sem est ers exam inat ionsshall be grant edadm issiont o 718t hsem est crs as t he case m ay be and on of t he course t heir result shallbe declared v9 t his relaxat ion shall be available t o all st udent swho have reached718 senlest ers upt oacadem icsession 20092010 t ill such t im e t he decisionoft he t akenvide I ct t erNo1737 DAA dat ed01 082008 shaI l rem ain in is however opent o t he t o applyt he carry on syst enlt o t he covered by calTy Oll Syst em by properly not ifyingt o t he st udent s j C 0 C I C5 I Z U 0 C 3C 06 Cfl C W7 I ll 08042010 BLS 1 9 6PERMGDKOHI JUDGE Whet hert o be referred0 t he L YES 0l 1 1 e 1 eL 76 4 9 t lcl1 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 25 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document