✦ High Court of India · 08 Apr 2010

Dat eofdecision0804 v. Guru Nanak Dev Universit yand anot her

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Apr 2010
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Apr 2010
Bench
Not available
Length
7,786 words

oft he first t wo sem est ers but t here will be no condit ionfor prom ot inga st udentfrom t hird sem est er t o fourt h sem est er C 1However a st udentshall be t o fllAlh sem est er only if he has passedat least 50I o oft he Orstfour seinest er d There will be 110 condit ion for a st udentfroinfiflh t o sixt hsem est er e However a st udent shall be prom ot edt o sevent hsem est er onlyi f he has passedall t he oft he flrst t wo sem est ers 0 The st udent shall be prom ot edt o eight h sem est er only if has passedall t he oft he first t hree sem est ers Aft er a periodof eight hsem est erst he st udent shall be givena periodof t wo consecut ive years m ore t o passfailingwhich he shall have t o st aot tt 1lecout se Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh at reshfrom t he flrst sem est er However such a JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 403 l CWP No8583 of2009 e 1 st udentwill not be requiredt o quaifyt he ent rt iilce t est agalll 99 The aforesaidOrdinances6carryon syst em lwas furt her am endedby t he Syndicat e111it s m eet ingheld Oll 132006 I ll t he m anner m r 0 C I C5 r Z m Ll 4 08 110 e 07 I l PresentHeading for vanous ilil CarryOll Syst emfor senlest er exalninat ions 6exceptI aw seinest oerexam inat ioons6except Proj oosedHeadllll iii9 Carry Oll Facult ies and School of vanous Facult ies and School Sciencesl of Social Sciences 1 Vide t he am endm ent t he cny on syst emfor various sem est er exam inat ionswas m ade t o t he Facult ies as well exceptLaw and School of Social Sciences However t he am endm ent appliedfrom Session 2007e2008The Universit yfurt her int roducedt he am endm ent 111 t he carry on syst emof B Tech M Tech MCA and MBA5 yearscourse vide it s decision dat ed 1 82008 wherebyt he carry Oll syst em was appliedin all t he exceptLaw and School of Social Sciencesfor which t hereare separat eOrdinances Vide t he aforesaid decision t he carry on syst em was m ade applicablet o t he Com put erScience and Elect ronic by way of furt her clarificat ion of t he am endm ent int roducedvide I t em N023 in t he m eet ingof t he Oll 05122006 The oft he decision dat ed Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Ol 082008 wherebyt he am endedOrdinancesGoverningt he calTY JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 404 CWP No8583 of2009 ee9 Oll syst emhas been appliedt o all t he courses referred t o hercabove As a consequenceoft he of carry on syst cma st udentcan be from first sem est er t o second SClllCSt er wit hout any condit ion However such a st udentcan be t o t llird sem est er if he has passedat Jeast 50 per cent t he First t wo sem est ers For scm est er 110 COlldit ionis Againfol t o 4 t o 5 sem est era st udentm ust pass at least 50 per cent t hc llrst four sem est ers Again for from 5 t o 6 scm est er ls wit houtany colldit ion For t o 7 sem est er a furt her 1S creat ed t hat t he st udent m ust pass all oft he first t wo sem est ers Sim arlyfor t o 8 sem est ers a st udentm ust qualifyall t he oft hc first t hree t hereby a st udent will not be cligiblet o seek adm ission in 7 sem est er ifhe llas any reappearor first t wo sem est ers Sam e eligibilit ycondit ion will applyfot t o 8 sem est er and if t he sm dent has a w 0 0 I C I Z m 1 4 4 e e r1 07 C l 9 3 I l 0 n GV reappear or backlogoffirst t hree sem est ers he is ineligiblet o seek adm issionin 8 sem est er The grievanceof t he is t hat t he am eildinent int roducedor t he clarificat ion issued vide order dat edOl 082008 1S illegaland lll casesof t he t o Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t heir cont ent ion reliance is placedon Wit h a view t he Ordinance JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 405 J CWP No85830f2009 10 dat ed 14 l l 2000 Annexure I which was 111force at t he t im e 1 1 r 0 0 C5 I Z n 08 4a e7 22 0 e of adm ission which onlyrequired40 per cent aggregat cm arksof all t he papers in a sem est er of t he facll whet her a st udentfails in one or m ore papersof t hat sem est ers I t is furt ller cont ended t hat carry on syst emwhich was int roduced in t he Universit yCalendar 1999 Vol I I l has 110 t o t he and TechnologyFacult oiesLaw and Scllool of Social Sciences as 1S evident from Allnexure P3 Even t he am endincnt int roduced pursuantt o t he decision of t he Sylldicat cvide llem No3 111t he m eet ingheld on 5 22 006 carry on syst emfort he Facult ies has been appliedfrom Session 20002008 I t is subm iuedt llat Slnce t he adm it t ed I ll t he year 2005 t his am endm entis agaillnot applicblet o t he hallingbcen m ade from Session 20072008 as per t he cont ained in t he am endm cntOrdinances it self 1t is furt hetcont endedt hat vide order dat edOl 082008 Pe4I herein Eheam endm enthas been applied which has adverselyaffect ed t he career t he Accordingt o t he leam ed counsel for t he had t he known t hat t heywould be requiredt o clear all t he reappear of flrst 213 sem est ers t heywould have conceont rat edOll t hose papers on priorit y Now aft er t wo years t he Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 C1 0 0 C5 I Z 1 C 4 X r11 e 0 406 f CWP N 8583 of2009 1e cannot be punishedfor not havingclearedt he papcrs t wo years I t 1S t he case of t he t hat t hc operat ionof t he rules is palt icuarlyWllcn it t akes away any of t he rightof t he hit hert o availablc111 exist ingst at ut ellaw t o t he t he only requlrem entfor t o t he seven and eight hsem est ers was t hat a candidat eshould secure 40 per cent m arks in aggregat e 111a sem est er of t he fact whet hera candidat ehas failed 111 one or m ore oft he papersoft hat sem est er I n t he replyfiled by t he t he has reliedlpOllt he order dat ed Ol082008 carry on syst emhas been appliedt o all t he courses 111 t he exceptLaw and School of Social Sciences Thcsc t wo courses beinggovem edby separat eOrdinances lt lS reit erat edt hat any having 111 t he first t wo sem est ers is ineligiblefor seekingadm ission t o 7 selnest er and a candidat ehavingreappear lll first t hreesem est ers 1Sineligiblet o seek adm ission in 8 sem est er I t is st at edt hat as a m at t er of fact ordcr dat ed01082008 1S not an am endm entt o t he but onlybyway of clarificat ion as previousOrdinances of 2000 were lI l t his regardand t hus necessit at ed a clarificat ion I t is m ent ioned in t he repI yfiled by t he Universit y t hat som e Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he who had appearedm reappear JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 407 111 f CWP N08583 of2009 12e exam inat ions Oll t wo sem est ers were grant ed m 0 C I C I r Z 1Z W 08 00 r e 3 L r adm issiont o 7 sem est er subj ectt o clearanceoft he oft he first t wo sem est ers Oll t heir filingof t he affldavit t hat in t he evellt of t he failure of t he candidat et o clear t he reappear of first t wo sem est erst he adm ission t o 7 seinest er could be cancelled Sim ilar affidavit s were flled by t he securedadm ission lll 8 sm est er while flrst t hree selnest erspapers I t is sublnit t ed0oaltall t he adm issioonst o 7 and 8 sem est ers in respectt o t he candidat s who had bacloI ogof flrst 213sem est ers Were provisionalin nat ure and could be cancelledOll t heir failure t o clear t he When t hese pet it ionswere filed int erim orders were passedby t his Court in CWP No8583 of 2009 on 29052009 aJlowogent ryin 8 selnest er Sinlar orderswere passedin ot her t o seek adm issionin 7 and t he 8 sem est ers andalso t o appear lll t he exam inat ionsfrom t im e t o t im e MrD Pat walia leam cd counsel for t he has however arguedt hat neit her lhe Ordinances carrylngon syst enlare in nat ure nor t hc oorderdat ed Ol 082008 can be const rued t o have H1s furt her cont ent ios t hat t he Universit is ent it led t o changet he rules even duringt he cont lnuance oft lle Courseby a Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 408 CWP Nt 08583of2009 13 st udentas t he does not hold a pronlisct o a st udentnot t o changet he durat ion or t he m anner or m et hod of from one sem est ers t o anot loerexcept t he Ol a courseof st udyfor which a st udentm ay be ent it ledt o onot ice Tlle have placedreliance upon a Single oft his Court report edPawan Kum ar Shanna Vs The St at e of Puniab and ot hers 1991 Recent Services 407 I n t his case t he affiliat ing byeI aws t he condit ion of passingt he exam inat ionsln a part icularchance The st udent swho are t he course at t he t im e of int roduct ionof t he assailed t he act ion of learnedSingleBench oft his Court t he held as followsl t he issue a I t has beenlaid down in t lle aboverefened t wo aut horit iest hat t he whicll are applicableat lt lle t inle a st udent t akesadm isslon111 t he consolidat edcourse would keepon applyiilg of any am endm ent t ill t he st udentSo adm it t ed t he t he course ln view of t llis were not j ust ifledin applyingt he byevlawswhich were on 16 Augusl 1986 t o t he st udent swho had got adm issionin t he BAMS course 111 t he flrst year priort o t hat 1 Lr 0 C I C5 I 1 Z t r I 08 I Xl r 7 O 4 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh dat e 19 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 409 1 CWP No8583 of2009 14 t C1 Reliance 1S also placedOll anot her Division Bench of t his Court in t he case of Munish Kum ar Talwar Vs The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid Universit yof Healt h Sciences alld ot hers 2007 SL 330 ln t his case also t he rules for BAMS course were am ended The am ended rules adm issiont o final exam inat ionif t here 1S reappear111 t he second exam inat ion The pet it ionert hereill had rem appearln seconcl t houghhe was grant edadm ission t o t hird sem est er but not t o appear in t he exam inat ions This Court t he held as under 7 The short t hat requires 111 t hi s case is whet hert he ls t o be by t he am ended or Ordinance The had been t o in t he3 Professionalexam inat ionheld lll Aprivlay2005 I ft he originaldurat ion oft he 3 Professionalhad not been t unendedt he hadcleared t he reappearsof t he 2 Professional and on t hat account t here was before hiln t o appear in t he flnal exam inalion which was t hen t o be held in Novem bere m 0 0 I O Z m 1r Z 08 P7 2 3 LL 4 Decem ber 2005 As per t he sufing on account of t he wrong t heam endedOrclinancein his case he 1S JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 410 4 j CWPN8583 of2009 15 9 Since t he t o be t reat edas t o bat ch of year 2000 8S already not iced t heprovisionofpara11 would also com e t o his rescue When t he j oinedt he course he was ent it lcdt o t ake t hathe would be eligiblet o clear lst and 2005 Professionalby 2 He reallycould llOt have any say 111fixlngt he durat ionof t he 3 by ainendm eontin t he Ordinanceat ler he had j oinedt he COurse To rem edysucha sit uat iononly t he provision ofparal l ofOrdinance candidat es provideclt llat adm it t edpriort o 2001 will appear lll 15nal aft ert wo years of st udyI t Call be not icedt llat t he has st udiedwit h t he bat ch in 1 and 2 Professional exam inat ions Thus a different durat ion of t he course if being appliedt o sim ilarlysit uat ed candidat es We do not say t hat it am ount s t o discrim inat ionbut parit y need t o be I nam t ainedbet weensim iI arlysit ouot ed candidat es and t hal1 is what is soughtt o be achieved byOrdinance above We are t husoft he view t hat unam endedOrdinailcewould govemt he case oft he appellantand t he provisions 1 t r 0 C I C5 I Z m 0 08 OCl 047 2 0 C t he am ended Ordinance cannot be m ade Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t o him 95 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 411 9 CWP No8583 of2009 ee16m To t he cont rary Mre DS Pat walia leam edcounsel for t he has relied upon PuniabUniversit v Vs SubashChander andanot her 3 Court Cases 603 I n t hiscase t he hadsecuredadm issiont o MBBS course m t he year 1965 The exist ing e m m lm um of 50 per cent m arkst o pass in eachsubj ectI n addit ion t o t he above t herewas a rule for of gracem arks upt oone of t he t ot al m arksincludingm arksfor Pract icalandint em alassessm entifa candidat efails in one or m ore I n t heyear 1970 an am endm entwas m adein t he rules and t he award of grace m arks was conflned t o t ot al m arks t he m arks for int em al assessm ent Where a candidat efails in one or m ore he has in all wherea of passing also exist s I n case of BAMSI BDS exam inat iont he m arks of one percentwas confinedt o each subj ectandnot 1 f 0 0 C5 r Z a CE O8 iQQ m l 125 1223 8 t o of all The who wasa st udent of MBBS was failingin one He claim edgrace m arkson t he 4v 1 basisofuneam endedrules but he was awardedgracem arkson t he basisof t he am ended 1 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 412 6 C 1 CWP No8583 of2009 17 applyand t he am endedrules cannot be applied t o t he det rim entoft he caindidat esHonble t he Court wllile 1 C 0 C I C5 I Cr Z m I C49 00 Vo t l 4 t he 1SSUeheld as under 110 We do not agree Wit h t he learnedJudgesoft he Full Benchof t heHighCourtt hat t hereis any elenlentof 111 t he changebroughtabout by t he addit ionof t he t o Rule l oft he Calendarfor t he year 1970 t o t he Short er Oxford English St at ut eset c Third Edit ion in relat iont o m eans Operat ivewit h regardt o pastt im e The changebroughtabout by t he addit ion of t he except iont o Rule 2 does not say t hat it shall be operat ive wit h effect obviously from any earlier dat e I 7lis not possiblet o I t lS hold t hatit I S lll operat ionm erely because t hough int roducedin 1970it was applied t o SubashChander 1 who appearedfor t he final exam inat ion 1974 aAerhe had j oinedt lle course earlierin 1965 No proinise was m ade or could be deem edt o have been inade t o him at t he t im e of his adt nissionin I 965 t llat t here will be no alt erat ionof t he rule or regulat ionlll regardt o t he percent ageof inarks requiredfOr paSSlt lg any exam inat ion or award of grace m arks and t hat t he rules relat ingt heret owhich were 111forceat t he t im e of his adm issionwould cont inue t o be appliedt o hiin unt il Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh he finishedhiswhole course 01 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 413 9 CWP No8583 of2009 18 1 1 12 Thereforewe are clearlyoft he opilliclnt llat t hereis 110 of t he changein t he rule inade in t he year 1970having m erclybecauseit was appliedin 19740t o SubashChanderwho hadj oined t heMBBS course in 1965when t herule of grace m at ks was different lt l t hese circum st ances afflnnt he view of DK Mahaj anand PC Jam JJ in t he Division Bench in SewaRain V Kurukshet raUniversit yand t llc view t aken byt he learnedJudgesof t he Full Bench in lhe decision ullder in t his case and hold t hat t he Universit y in holdingt hat SubashChander l was not ent it ledt o 16 grace m arks under t he old rule but wasent it ledt o ollI y4 gracem arksunder t he new rule and had t herefore ilot t he exam ioilat lOll We allow t he appealbut wit houtwly ordel as t o cost s Howevert his decoisionwill not affect t llc result of t he exam inat ion of Subash Chander iil if it had beendeclaredas per t he direct ionof t he learnedJudgesoft he Full Benchin t he Let t rs Pat ent 1 0 0 I 0 I Z m C r 08 r2Q A Z t l e4 Appea59 The aforesaid followed byanot hct eBellcll t he Suprem eCourt t he case Puniab Universit v Vs Deviali Chakrabart iand ot hers 619843 Court Cases612 wherein it hasbeen held as followsl Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 0 C3 C5 I e Z 08 OO r a t l 414 9 CWP No8583 of2009 19 n t hc presentcase also t hc new decisionsare pnm a facie and t heydid not becoine m erelybecauset hey appliedt o st udent swho hadalready st art ed t heir educat ional careers We t herefore allow t heseappealsbut wit hout anyordcr as t o cost s and set asicle t he t he High Court and dist nisst he writ pet it ionsHowever t his dccision will not affect t he rightwhich lnight have been grant edt o t he 111t he writ pet it ionson t lle basis oft he Hlgh Court which have been reversediil OleseappealsI l A sim ilar I ssue cam e t o be considered by a Division Bench of t his Court ln t he case of Rahul Guiot aVs St at e of Haryana200041SCT 1099 wherein SubhashChandcrs case suprahas beenrelied upon and it hasbeenheld as underl 4 We have heardI earnedcounselfor t lle and are of t he View t hat t here is no m erit oin t lle writ pet it ionsThe onlyarguinentadvancedbyt he counsel for t he pet it ioneroist hal when ll9 clieiot j oinedt he diploI nacourse i ll t he year 1997 t he m ade it clear t hat t he durat ion of t hat 1 course was 3 years and t he coulclnot Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he course in t he academ ic session 199798 had changet he durat ion t il l t he st udent s who j oined JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 415 d CWP N8583 of2009 20 m 0 0 I C5 I Z 2 Lr I 06 OO em ao t l t lle SEllne He has placedrcliance Oll Full Bench of t his Court in SlnI zhSahot av St at eofPuniabet c 1993 41SLR 6731 1993 41 SCT 328 l P8 1V0 l17131and SwaraniitSinghandanot herv St at eofPuniaband ot hers 1998121SLR 1411997 41SCT 51103 8i HI 31 We are unable t o agree wit h t he cont ent loll of t he pet it ionerFronl t he st andt aken by t he lt 1S clear t hat t he com pet ent decidediil t he year 1995 t o revise t he curriculuin of Elect ronics alld Coininunicat ion Diplom aCourse t o 3 112 yeaors sem est ers The 7 sem est er includest he of 7 t rainingand t lle lnarks awardedt o a candidat ein t his t ram inghave t o be included in t he diplom a awarded t o is furt her clear t hat t he Direct or Technical Educat ion Haryanaby his com m unicat iondat ed1810 1995 inform cdall t he Principalsof t he lnst it ut es in t he St at e of Haryana which iinpartsuch educat ion t hat t he durat ion of t he course had been increased t o 3 112years and t hatt he revisedcurriculumwas t o be wit h effect Oom t he academ ic session 199596 What was t hatwllen t he issued for t he academ ic session 199798 t llerc Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh inadvert enterrort herein and t he durat ion JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document I l 416 9d CWP No8583 of2009 21e 6 of t he course was shown t o be of 3 years When t his error ilot iced t he Direct or Technical Educat ion Haryanasent anot her com m unicat ion t o al t he Principalsof t he I nst it ulcs educat ion in Elect ronics and Com m Ut llCat lOll DiplonlaCourset hat t he revisedcuuiculumwast o wit h effect frolll t he acadcm ic session 199596 This is not a casc where t hc durat ionof t he course in icst realne The durat ion of t he course had alrcadybeen increasedt o 32 yearsint he year 1995 and t he is onlyt ryingt o t ake of t he t hatcreptin t he oft lle prospect us t he acadeinicsession199798 We are 6lrt her of t he view t hat even aft er t he coom m enceI nent of t hecourse which was earlier3 years it was open t o t he com pet entaut horit yt o changet he durot ioil by t he Rules as has been observed byt heir Lordshipsof t he Suprem eCourt lll Panj ab v SubashChanderand anot her A1R 1984 SC 1415 When a course a periodof 3 years com m encesand t lle st udent s j oint hat course t he aut horit ies inake no prom ise t hat t here would be no alt erat ion of t lle durat lon andt hat t he Rules in regardt lleret o which were force at t he t iine of adinission would cont inue t o JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 0 C Cso I Z e 0 I c6 r 17 n n Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 417 46 CWP No8583 of2009 m 22 be appliedunt il t he whole coursc is flnished I n t he case beforeus as alreadyobservedt here was onlyan error lt l t he of t he prospect us on t he basisof which t he presentpet it ionhasbeen filed We are sat oisfledt llat t he durat ionof t llc course had been ext ended t o 3112 years over 7 sem est ers even beforc t hc pet it ionerj oinedt he sam e ln t his view oft lle m at t er t he who has cleared t lle 6 sem est er exallllOI lat lOlldid not becom eeligiblefor adm issiont o t he course I lle is yel t o t he t rainingin t he 7 Sem est er t he m arksobt ainedby him in t hat t raining would be t aken0int oaccount beforct hediplona1S awardedt o hilllell Anot her Division Bench of t his Court I ll t he case of 1 C 0 C C5 I Z 0 06 QO 07 22 t l AkashdeepBhargoand ot hersVs Baba Farid Universit yofHealt h Sciences and ot hers 2007 21 SCT 139 has observed as foI I owSl 4m 10 The fact s as not iced above clearlyshow t hat t he pet it ionershad been adinit t ed111 BAMS course in t he College No3 ln t he year 2000 and at t hat pointof t iine t lle said collegewas affiliat ed wit h Guru Nanak I Oev Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Universit ybut lat er on on const it ut ion of Baba Farid Universit yof Healt h Sciences t he said JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 418 1 A CWPN8583 of2009 23 m 0 0 C5 I Z Lr I 06 ri0 e Z t l 4 collegecat ne t o be affiliat ed wit h Baba Farid in March 2001 For a pcriodof soine t im e t he old of Guru Nanak Dev were m ade loo t he st udent swho were alreadyadm it t ed but lat er Oll Baba Farid of Healt h Sciencesfram ed it s own t aken on The decision 13 2001 has alreadybeen ext ract edabove The said decisions shows t hat onlyt hest udent sadlnit t edpriort o 2000 were t o be by od Tlle pet it ionershallecont inuedwit h t heirst udiesunder t he new of Baba Farid Theyhave t heir flnal BAMS exam inat ion held 111 t he m ont ll of MaylJune2006 I n t hese circunlst ances t he and ordinancesof Baba Farid operat lveat t he t im e of t he exam inat iOI lare t o govenl t he case of t he pet it ioners t lle ordinances of Baba Farid do not cont ain any provisionof grace m arks as clait ned byt he The calm ol clalm t o have acquiredany vest ed right s noerelyOll Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t hey were governedby Guru Nanak Dev account of t he fact t hat at t he t im e of adm ission JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 419 t 4 k CWP N8583 of2009 24 Universit y We do not find t hat t he gnevance lnade by t he t hat a operat ionhas been givent o t he ordinanceof Baba Farid is j ust ified As a m at t er of t loe case I ll hoiod is squarely e r 0 C4 C5 2 V C 3 Cll C 47 0 covered byt he Subash of t he Suprcm eCourt in Chanderscase 6supral I n lI iew of t he dict um of t he aforesaidj udgm entoft he Honble Court in t he cases of Subash Chanders Hawaldar Singhs supraJand t wo Division Benches t his Court lll Rahul Gupt aand Bhargoscases supra t he int roduct ion of t he cany on syst emcannot be said t o 111 So long lt was aPPliedt o t he exam inat ions held afler carry Oll syst em So plied The not at all ent it ledt o invoke eit her t he doct rine of est oppelor t he I t has been cont endedon behalf of t he t hat t wo nam ely Kaur and Am it Bhardwajwho VPm ea had also flled writ pet it ionshave been t o appear in t he sem est ers exam inat ions af1er t he writ wit hdrawn Vide order dat ed Ol022010 passedby t his Court MrPat walia asked t o flle an af8davit lll 1 t his regard Affidavit hasbeen filed Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 420 11 CWP N8583 of2009 4 25 I n t he aforesaid aff3davit of t hc 0 C43 I C5 I Z a r r ct j CLl r7 2 CL about declarat ionof result of t hree candidat esnam ed above who wit hdrew t he writ pet it ionsand t o t he next sem est er have been adm it t ed I t 1S st at ed lll t he affida1I itfiled by t he t he Guni Nanak Dev t hat t he nlat t cr relat ingt o cany Oll syst emwas considered by t he Com m it t ee const it ut edbyt he ViceChancellor on 3 1072008 The Com lniuee not iced t hat Slllce t he posit ionwoh regardt o t he unifom l t he carry on syst em was not clear but cert aln ineligiblepersonshave been adm it t edunder cany ot l syst em I t is furt hernot iced t hat received from t he st udent s from various oft he carry on syst em I n respectt o ineligiblecandidat eswho were grant edadm issions Under t he carry Oll syst em it was t o t he t o concerned aut llorit iest o givet hem a specialchance lt is furt her m ent ioned t haton receiptofsuch requestfrom t he candidat es t heir cases for adm ission wiJl be considered lll specialt erm s A copy of t llc decision of t he Com m it t ee 1S also enclosed alongwit h t hc affldavit m ent ionedin t he affidavit t hat ln view of t he aforesaid decision t he candidat eswho wit hdrew t heir Wrll pct it ionswere given spccialchance t o cleart he fust and second seinest erspapers along wit h 7 and 8 sem est ers Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 421 l CWP No8583 of2009 26 t hey were adm issions t o 7 alld 8 sem est erSe Even afler t hese writ pet it iollSwere reserved for som e have been flled Oll behalfof som e of t hewrit t o wit hdrew 8om t he writ obviously t o t akebenefit of t he Universit ysOWll decision I t is also t o not e t hat t he decision of t he Universit ygrat ingrelaxat ion was not circulat edin all t he and has been applied111a select iveway The had 110 of such a decision and t hus t heycould not cven applyseekingt lle benefit of t he decision I t is a m at t er of concern for t his Court t o not e t hat soit uat edwrit who have wit hdrawn t heir wlit have been relief and t he presentwrit havebeeondeoniedt he benefit w0it houtany lawful and valid reasons Even t hought he carry on syst emunder challengeI ll t hepreselltwrit deseorvesno in view of t he law I aid down by t he Apex Court I ll PuniabUniversit v VSe SubhashChander and ailot her and Puniab Universilv Chandigarh Vs Deviani Chakrabart iand ot hers it can be said t hat t he decision t o int roduce on syst em m id coursc 1S 111 However t he fact rem alllS t hal t lle 1 Q 0 C CO I Z a Q r Wlm 08 00 a7 212 Universit yln lt s wisdom chose t o grant special chance t o Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh candidat es for clearingflorst and second sem est er JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 422 L 1 CWP N8583 of2009 27m exainlnat lOllS and were also grant edadmission 10 7 and 8 sem est ers wit looutclearingt he backlog Tllis decisioll has been appliedselect ivelyand not This act ion of t he I aw and is an exerciseof power deservesno The as an I nst it ut ion has t o act 111811 m anner t o all The Act ion oft he Unlversit ydo not suggcstso Som eof t he sim ilarlysit uat ed candidat eshave been grant edt he benefit of specialchance and adm issionst o t he highersem est ers despit et heir undert he carry on syst emwhereas ot hershave been deniedsim ilar relief I n view of t he above t he cannot be t reat ed and wit h host ilit yTheyshall also be ent it led t o t he specialchance grant edt o ot her silnilarlysit uat ed m C 0 0 I 0 I 4 Z 12 X 08 CO t 7 Oae st udent sfor clearingt he papersof first and second sem cst ers Oll unifonn pat t erneTheir rightt o adm ission t o 718 sem est ers cannot be denied t o t hem These 4eV allowed 111t he followingm anner i1 Such of t he who have not availed specialchance for clearingflrst and second sem est ersrem appcarwill bc provided specialchancefor t he purpose ii9 adm issions grant edt o t he t o 718 undert he int erim ordersoft his Court shall st and Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh sem est ers JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t CWPN08583 of2009 m 28 result of t he who have lll 718t h sem est ersexam inat ions shall be declared iv9 t hose who have been denied adm issionsin 718 sem est ers Oll account secondlt hird sem est ers exam inat ionssloallbe grant edadm issiont o 718 scm est ers ast he case m ay be and on of t he course t heir result shall be declared v9 t his relaxat ion shall be available t o all st udent swho havc reached718 sem est ers upt o academ icsessioll 200920 10 Or t ill such t im e t he decision oft he Universit yt akenvide let t erNo1737e DAA dat edOl082008 sha reot naln ln I t is however opent o t he t o applyt he cariy oil syst emt o t he covered by carry Oll syst en by properly not ifyingt o t he st udent s m 0 0 I C5 I Z m Q C 08 C10 t 2 0 08042010 BLS 1 PERMOD KOHLJ JUDGE Whet hert o be referredt o t he L YES Ol 1 ee1 e 7 e 1 C5 1 1017 Parkash Om 2014.03.29 10: 20 True Scanned Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments