I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT v. CORAM2

learned counsel t he part iesI am oft he consideredview t hat once t wo Sewaks like Gram t he Sub been broughtln cadre of Village Ext ension Workers t here cannot be any furt her discrim inat ionon t he basis of t heir birt h m arks The beneflt givent o nam ely Gram Sewaksbyorder oft he Court dat ed 2431979 would also enure t o t he as t heyare sit uat ed99 3e We haveheardlearnedcounselfor t he part iesand t he record 4 Learned counselfor t he subm it t edt hat t he writ it self and were in t he regularpay scale Merely because t hey were t o work lll t he proj ectas VillageExt ension Workers t heycould not be held t o be JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document SURESH KUMAR 2014.09.30 11: 05 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh C 1 r 0 C C I Z I 08 m 7 Z Qm 416 NoAl of200560Ml 4 I ent it led t o higherpay scale on t he t hat persons t aken on from Gram Sachivswere given higher pay scale Theywere t o work on a proj ectand never becam epartof any cadre Theycould not claim parit ywit h Gram Sachivswho were from different and bot h a cadre The proj ectcam e t o an end lI l t he year 1993 AnnexureP1 was a and no rightaccrued t o t he t herefrom 5 t he 6 Learned counsel for t he writ support for considerat ion1S whet her t he writ pet lt lonersare ent it ledt o parit ywit h Gram Sachivsin t he m at t er of pay scale et c on t he groundt hat t heyform ed partofcadre ofVillageExt ensionWorkers 7 We flnd t hat t houghlearned SingleJudgehas on t he t hat bot h t he classes Gram Sachivs and Sub form ed one cadre we do not find sufflcient m at erial on recordfor t his Only m at erialon record 1S proj ectAnnexure Pl which doesnot providefor const it ut ion of a cadre Conceptof proj ect1S JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document SURESH KUMAR 2014.09.30 11: 05 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh ilJ 0 1 C 0 C CA9 I Z m Cl 08 CO V7 Z t l 417 NoAl of2005608M9 5 different from t hat of cadre However t he said proj ect for incent ivest o bot h t he Sub as well as Gram Sachivsand on t hat basis t he seek parit yln of order of Honble t he Court in t he case of Gram Sachivs which claim has t o be considered We are of t he Vlew t hat lI l t he circum st ances oft he case it will be in t he int erestofj ust ice t hat t he m at t er 1S t o be consideredafreshby t he t o Governm ent m ayt ake a decision wit hin t hreem ont hsfrom receiptof a copy of t his order I f t he will be at libert yt o t ake t heir rem edyin accordancewit h are not sat isfled t hey 1aw 8 The appealis e9 ldarsh Kt im ar Goe 9 March 03 2010 4 I CO CA SURESH KUMAR 2014.09.30 11: 05 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Judge Alok Singh Judge JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document