GuruNanak Dev and anot her 5 CWP No3363 of2009 Rim piKum ari v. GuruNanak Dev and anot her 6 CWP No339 of2009 Sahas Chopraand anot
Judgment
st udentllromfirst sem est er t o secondseinest er b1However a st udentshall be sem est er only if he has passcdat least 50I o t o t hiord of t hefirst t wo sem est ersbut t here will be no condit ionfot a st udentfrooin t hirdsem est er t o fourt hsem est er C 9However a st udentshall be t o Oft h sem est er onI y if he has passedat least 50I o oft he flrst four sclncst er d There will be no condit ion for st udentfrom flflh t o sixt hsem est er e However a st udentshall be a t o sevent hsem est er onlyif he has passedall t he oft he flrst t wo seinest ers 0 The st udcnt shall be t o eight h GV sem est er only if he has passedall t he oft he first t hreesem est ers Afler a periodof eight hseinest erst he st udcntshall be givena periodof t wo consecut ive years m ore t o pass failingwhich he shall have t o st art t he course Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh at lesh from t he first sem est er However such a JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 85 1 1 J CWPNo8583 of2009 m 8 st udentwill not bc t o qt ialifyt he ent rance t est agallleI l TheaforesaidOrdinancescany on syst en was furt her am endedbyt he t he followingm anner in it s lncet ingheld on 13122006 llll PrcsentHeadingl ProoosedHadingl for various iil Cany on iiil Carryon sem est er exam lnat ionS exceptlaw seinest er exam inat ionsexceptLaw Facult iesand Scllool of Social Facult iesand School of Social Vide t he am endm ent t he carry on for various sem est erexam inat ionswas m ade t o t he 1 L 0 3 I C5 I Z Ct Facult ies as well exceptLaw and SchoolofSocial 06 C0 m 7 Z 11 Sciences However t he am endm entwas appliedfrom Session 20072008 The filrt her int roducedt he am endm ent111 t hecarry on syst emof B Tech M Tech NlCA and MBA 5 yearscourse vide it s decision dat ed l 82008 wherebyt he carry on syst em was in all t he exceptLaw and SchoolofSocial Sciencesforwhich t hereare eem e Vide t he aforesaid decision t he carry on syst emwas m ade t o t he Com put erScielce 8e and Elect ronic by way of furt ller clarificat ion of t he am endm ent int roducedvide em No23 I I l t hem eet ingof t he on 05122006 The oft he decision dat ed Rashmi 01 082008 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t he am endedOrdinancesGoverningt he carry JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 86 1 CWPN08583of2009 9 has been appliedt o all t he courscsreferred t o hereineabove As a consequcnceoft he of carry on a st udentcan be from first sem est er t o second sem cst er wit houtany condit ion However such a st udentcan be t o t hird sem est er if he has passedat least 50 per cent of t he First t wo sem est ers For sem est er no condit ion is Againfor sem est era st udentm ust passat least 50 per cent t o 4 t o 5 t he first four sem est ers from 5 t o 6 sem est erlS wit houtany condit ion For t o 7 sem est er a furt her cm bargo1S creat ed t hat t he st udent m ust pass all oft he fust t wo sem est ers Sim ilarlyfor t o 8 sem est ers a st udentm ust qualifyall t he oft he first t hree t hereby a st udent will not be t o seek adm issionin 7 sem est erifhe has any reappearor t lrst t wo sem est ers Sam e eligibilit ycondit ion woill applyfor t o 8 sem est er and if t he st udent has a 1 C1 0 C I C5 I Z Q I 08 00 W2 Z Ll C reappearor of first t hreesem est ers he is ineligiblet o seek adm issionin 8 sem est er The grievanceof t he pet lonersis t hat t he am endrnent int roducedor t he clarificat ion issued vide order dat edOl 082008 1S illegaland ln cases of t he t o Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t heir cont ent ion reliance is placedOll Wit ll a Vlew JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t he OrdinallCC 87 4 4I lt 1 CWPNo8583 of2009 O dat ed141 12000 AnnexureP1 whlch waS lll force at t lle t im e which only 40 per cent m arksof all t he papers in a sem est er of t lle fact whet hera st udentfails in one or m ore papersof t hat sem est ers I t is furt hcr cont endedt hat carry on which was int roduced4 t llc Calendar 1999 701 Uo has no t o t le and TechnologyFacult iesLaw and Schoolof Social Sciencesas 1S from Annexure Pm 3 Even t he at nendm ent uant t o t he decision of t lle vide I t cm N023 111t he held on 51 22006 carry on syst emfor t he Facult ies has been from Session20072008 I t is subm it t edt hat Slnce t he were adm it t edI n t he year 2005 t his am endm entis againnot t o t he havingbeen m ade from Session 20072008 as per t he cont ainedin t he am endm entOrdinances it self I t lS cont endedt hat vide order dat edOl 082008 4nnexureP41 1 0 0 I C5 Z C 08 n0 aW2 Z C herein t he am endm enthas been applied which has affect ed t he career t he t o t he leam ed counsel for t he had t he known t hat t heywould be requiredt o clear all t he of first 213sem est ers t heywould have concent rat ed on Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t hose papers on prior Now aft er t wo years t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 88 1 1 0 0 C5 I Z Z 08 r 17 Z CWPNo8583 of2009 11m cannotbe punshedfor not havillgclearedt he papcrst wo years I t 1S t he case of t he t hat t he of t he rules is when it t akes anyof t he rightof t he hit her t o available111 st at ut elI aw t o t he t he only t o t he seven and eight hsem est ers was t hata candidat eshouldsecure 40 per cent m arksin aggregat ein a sem est er of t he fact whet hera candidat ehas failed in oneor m ore oft he papersoft hat sem est er I n t he replyfiled by t he t he has relied upon t he order dat edOl 082008 whereby cart y on t he I ll has been appliedt o all t he courses exceptLaw and School of Social Sciences Thcse t wo courses being by separat eOrdinances I t is t hat any having 111 t he flrst t wo sem est ers 1S for seekingadm ission t o 7 and a candidat ehaig reappear in f1rstt hreesem est ers lS t o seek 8dm issionin 8 sem est er I t is st at edt hat as a m at t erof fact order dat edOl 082008 is not an am endm entt o t he but 0n1yby way of clariflcat ion as Ordinances of 2000 were in t his regardand t hus necessit at eda I t is m ent ionedin t he replyflled by t he Universit y t hat Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh som e of t he who had eared ln JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document reappear 89 W4 CWPNo8583 of2009 12e exam inat ionson first t wo sem est ers were adm issiont o 7 sem est er t o clearanceoft he backogoft he first t wo sem est ers OI l t heirllilingoft he affldavitt hat in t he event oft he failureof t he candidat et o clear t he iopeaf first t wo t he adm issiont o l sem est er could be cancellcd Sim ilar affidavit s filed by t he securedadm ission lI l 8 sem est er while in first t hree sem est erspapers I t is t hat all t he adm issionst o 7 and 8 sem est ersin respectt o t he candidat eswho had baclologof 213sem est ers were in llat ure and could be cancellcdOll t heirfailuret o clear t he back4og When t hese were flled int eriln orders were by t his Court 111 CWP No8583 of 2009 Oll 292009 ent ryin 8 sem est eor Sim ilarorderswere passedlll ot her t he t o seek adm issionin 7 and 8 sem est ersand also t o appearlll t he exam inat ioonslrom t im e t o t im e 1 r 0 0 I C I Z C I C45 m 7 Z Jm CV MlDS Pat walia I earned counsel for t he has however arguedt hat neit her t he Ordinances carryingon syst emare lll nat urenor t hc order dat ed Ol082008 can be const rued t o have His furt her cont ent ionis t hat t he Universit yis ent it led t o changet he rules even duringt he cont inuanceoft he Course bya Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 90 1 m C 0 C I C5 I Z m I 06 3 Z Cl CWP N8583 of2009 13 as t he Universit ydocsnot hold a prom isct o a st udentnot t o t he durat ionor t hc m anneror m et hod of from one sem est ers t o anot herexcept t he courscof st udyfor which a st udentm ay be ent it ledt o not ice The have placedreliance upon a Single oft his Court Pawan Kum ar Sham la Vs Thc St at e of Puniab and ot hers 1991 639 Recent Senes 407 I n t his case t he affiliat ing t he condit ion of passingt he exanllllat lOI lS ln a chance The st udent s who are t he course at t he t im e of int roduct ionof t he bycvs assailedt he act ion of leam edSingleBench oft his Court held t he Universit y as follows t he lSsue a I t has becnlaid down in t he above referredt wo aut horit iest hat t he t he t im ea st udentt akesadm issionin t he consolidat edcourse would 1ep on applying of anyam endm ent t ill t he st udentSO adm it t ed com plet est he course I n view of t his t he werc not j ust ifledin applyingt he byeelawswhich were on 16 August 1986 t o t hest udent swho hadgot adm issioniont he BAMS course m t he 8rst year priort o t hat Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh dat e 13 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 91 j J CWP No8583 of2009 1 1 w14m 1 C 0 C I C5 I Z e r I 08 r m a Z Reliance 1S also placedon Division Bench oft his Court in t he case of Munish Kum ar Talwar Vs The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid Universit vof l4ealt h Sciences and ot hers 2007 S 330 I lot his case also t he rules for BAMS course were am ended The am ended rules adm issiont o flnal exaom inat ionift here lS reappearln t he second exam inat ion The t llsreinhad reppcar lI l second t houghhe was adm ission t o t hirdsem est er but not t o appearin t he exam inat ions This Court t he held as under 7 The short t hat requircsdet erininat ion t his case is whet her t he is t o be by t he am ended or unwainended Ordinance The had been oennit t edt o in t he 3 Professional exam inat ionheld lll 2005 lft he originaldurat ionoft he 3 Professionalhad not beenam endedt he hadcleared t he reappearsof t he 2 Professional and on t hat account t here was before him t o appear in t he final exam inat lOll which was t hen t o be held in Novem bere Decem ber 2005 As per t he sufferingon account of t he wrong t heam endedOrdinance ionhis case he lS JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 92 00 J CWPN85830f2009 el 5 77 m 0 0 I C5 I Z t r I 08 OO 7 Z t l e4 9 Since t hc t o be t reat edas belongingt o bat ch of year 2000 as already not icedt heprovisionofparal would also coine t o his rescue When t he t he course he was ent oit ledt o t ake t hathe wouW be eligiblet o cleat st and 2 Professionalby NoveinbereDecem ber2005 He reallycould t lot have any say in Oxingt he durat ionof t he 3 t he byam endm entln Ordinanceaft erhe had j oinedt he coursc To sucha sit uat iononly t heprovision ofparaI l of Ordinance candidat esadm it t edpriort o 2001 will appearin providedt hat aft ert wo yearsof st udyI t be not icedt hat t lle appeanthas st udiedwit h t he bat Ch in 1 and 2 Professional exaininat ions Thus a diffcrent durat ionof t he course if being appliedt o sim ilarlysit uat edcandidat es We do notsay t hat it am ount s t o discriinnat ionbut parit y needt o be inaint aincdbet ween sit uat ed candidat esand t hat I S what is soughtt o be achievedbyOrdinance above We are t husoft he view t hat unam endedOrdinancewould govem t hecase oft he and t heprosions t he am ended Ordinance cannot be m ade Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t o him 55 JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 93 1 rJ d CWPNo8583 of2009 16 To t hecont rary Mr DS Pat walia lcarncd counsel appeanngfor t he has oreliedupon PuniabUniversit y Vs Chanderand anot her 98413 Cout t Cases 603 I n t hs case t he hadsecuredadm issiont o MBBS course 111 t heyear 1965 The exist ing nlinlnlUlll of 50 per cent m arkst o pass in each subj ectln addit ion t o t he above t here wasa rule for grantof grace m arks upt oOne of t het ot al aggregat em arksincludinglnarks for andint ernalassessm entif a candidat efails ln OilC Or 111010 I n t heyear 1970 an am endm entwas m ade in t he rules and t he award of grace m at 1cs was conflllcdt o t ot al m arks excludingt he lnarks for int em al assessm ent Wherc a candidat efails ln one oor m ore he has in all wherea separat e of passing also exist s I n case of BAMSI BDS exam inat iont he m arks of one percentwas confinedt o each subj ectand not t o of all subj ect sThe who was a st udentof MBBS was failingln one paperHe claim ed grace m arkson t he basis ofunam endedrules but he was awardedgracem at 1cson t he basis of t he am endedrules which did not prove beneScial t o him He t he sam e in t he Punj aband HaryanaHigh Court A 1 0 0 I CA I Z l 06 ri3 3 Z a Full Bench oft hisCourt allowed t he writ pet it ionholdingt hatt he Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh at t he t im e of t he adm issionof t he st lldent swould JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 94 CWPNo8583 of2009 91 17 applyandt he rules cannot be applied t o t hedet rim entoft hecandidat es Honblc t he Court while t he issueheld as underl 1 C 0 0 I C5 I Z 2 C 08 m W2 Z t l 11 We donot agreewit h t he learnedJudgesof t he FullBenchoft he HighCourt t hatt here is any eI elnentof ret rospect ivlt yin t he broughtabout by t he addit ionoft he t o Rule 2l oft he Calendarfor t heyear 1970 Oxford t o t he Short er Third Edit ion in rclat iont o St at ut eset c m eans wit h regardt o pastt im e The broughtabout by t he addit ion of t lle t o Rule 2 does not say t hat it shall be wit h effect from any earlier dat e I t I t ois not possiblet o hold t hatit is 1n m erelybecouse t hough int roduced111 1970it was t o SubashChander 1 who for t he Onalexat ninat ionI ll 1974aft erhe hadj oinedt he course earlierin 1965 No was m ade or could be deem edt o havebeen m ad t o him at t he t iine of his adm ission in 1965t hat t herewill be no alt erat ionof t he rule or t o t he percent ageof m arks for passing anyexaininat ionor awardof grace m arksand t hat t he t heret owhich were in force at t he t im e of Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh hefinishedhiswholecourse 91 hisadm ission would coilt lnuet o be appliedt o hiin unt il JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9 J 10 0 0 I 0 I Z r 08 QO m e Z Om Ce 95 CWPNo8583 of2009 18 1 12 Thereforcweare clearlyoft he opiiont hatt hereis 1970 of t he changein t he rule m ade in t he year m erelybccause lt in 1974 t o SubashChanderwho hadj oined t heA4BBScourse in 1965when t he rule of grace m arkswas different t hesecircuinst ances affinnt he view of DK Mahaj anand P Jain JJ in t heDivision Bench in SewaRain V Kurukshet ra byt he t he view t aken learnedJudgesof t he Full Bench in t he decision under appealin t his case andhold t hat t he Universit y rightin holdingt hatSubashChander l was not ent it ledt o 16 grace m arksundcr t he old rule butwas ent it ledt o only4 gracem arksuildcrlhe new rule and had t hereforenot passedt he cxam inat ion 111 We allow t he appealbut wit hout any order as t o cost s Howevert his decision woillnot affect t he result of t he exam inat ion of Subash Chander I ll if it had beendeclaredas per t he direct ionof t helearnedJudgesoft he Full Bench in t loeLet t ersPat ent Appeal The aforesaid was followed byanot herBench t he Court 111 t he case of Puniab Universit y Vs DevianiChakrabart iand ot hers 198493 CourtCases 612 wherein it hasbeen held as followsl Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 96 4 CWPNo8583of2009 r e19 9n t he prescntcase alsot he new decisions are and t heydid not becom e m erelybecauset hey appliedt o st udent swho had already st art edt heir educat ionalcareers We t herefore allow t hese but wit hout any order as t o cost sand set aside t he t he Hlgh Court and disinisst he writ pet it ionsHowever t his decisionwill not affectt he rightwhich m ight have been t o t he in t he writ on t he basis oft he Hlgll Courtwhich llavebeenreversedin t heseappeals A sim ilar issue cam e t o be consideredby a Division Bcnch of t his Court 111 t he case of Rahul Gupt a Vs St at e of Hryana 2000 4 5CT supralhasbeen relied 1099 whereinSubhashChanders case upon and it has beenheld as underl r 0 C I C5 I Z I 08 m m Z Qm 4 We haveheardleam edcounselfor t hepart ies and are of t he Vlew t hat t here is no m erit in t he writpet it ionsThe onlyargum entadvancedbyt he counselfor t he is t hat when his client j oinedt he diplom acourse m t he year 1997t he m adeit clear t hat t he durat ionof t hat Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh course was 3 ycarsandt he couldnot changet he durat iont ill t he st udeont swho j oined JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t he course in t he academ icsession 199798 had 97 1 CWPNo8583 of2009 r7J 20 t he sam e He has placedreliance on Full Bcnch of t his Court in Alnardeep Sinh Sahot av St at eofPuniabet c 1993 41SLR 67311993 441SCT 328 08 Hl 7Bl and Singhand anot herv St at eofPuniab and ot hers1998 21 SLR 1411997 41 SCT 51 H FBI We are unable t o agree wit h t hc COt lt ent ionof t he From t he st andt aken by t he decided it 1S clear t hat t he com pet ent in t he year 1995t o reviset he curriculuinof Elect ronics and Coinm unicat ion Course t o 3m 12 years consiingof 7 sem est ers The 7 sem est er includest he it olant and t he inarks awardedt o a candidat ein t his t raininghave t o be includcd in t he diplolna awarded t o him I t 1S furt her clear t hat t he Direct or Techilical Educat ion Haryanaby his coinm unicat iondat ed1810 1995 infonnedall t he oft he I nst it ut esin t he St at eofHaryana which im partsuch educat ion t hat t he durat ionof t he course had beenincreased t o 3112 years and t hatt herevised curriculumwas t o be wit h effect from t he academ ic session 199960 What happenedwas t hatwhent he prospect uswas issued for t he academ ic session 1997m 98t here was an inadvert enteneor t herein and t he durat ion JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Q 0 CO I C5 I Z I 08 CO Z CL Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 98 m d CWP No8583 of2009 21m of t lle coursc was shownt o bc of 3 years When t hiset ror was not iced t he Direct or Technical Educat ionHat yanasentanot hercom m unicat ion t o all t lle t he I nst it ut es educat ion 111 Elect ronics aI ld Colnm unicat ion Courset hatt herevisedcurriculumwas t o wit h effect from t he academ ic sesSlOll 199596 This is not a case where t he durat ionof t lle course The was changcdinidest ream durat ion of t he course had alreadybeen increasedt o 3m 112years in t hc year 1995and t he is onlyt ryingt o t ake of t he errort hat creptin t he oft he prospect us fort he academ icsession1997e98 We are furt her of t he view t hat even aft ert he coinoinencem ent of t hecourse which was earlier3 ycarsit was opent o t he t o changet he durat ionby t he Rules as has beeilobservedbyt heir t he Suprem eCourt in Panj ab v SubashChanderand anot her AlRe 1984 SC 1415 When a course st ret chingover a periodof 3 years com m encesand t he st udent s j oin t hat course t he aut horit iesom akeno prom ise t hat t here would be no alt erat ionof t lle durat loll andt hat t he Rulesin regardt heret owhich were m force at t he t im e of adm ission would cont inue t o JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document j 0 CAO I C I Z W C I 08 10 Z Ll Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 99 1 e CWPN8583 of2009 m 22m unt il t he whole coursc is finished ln t he case beforcus as alreadyobservedt herewas onlyan crrorin t he of t he prospect us Oll t hebasisofwhich t he prescntpet it ionhas bcCll filed We are sat isfiedt hat t hc durat ionof t he COllrSC had been ext endcd 10 3 112 years over 7 sem est ers even before t hc j oinedt he saine ln t his view of t hc m at t er t he who has cleared t he 6 seinest erexam inat loll did not becom e eligiblefor adm lssiont o t he course He is yet t o t he it olant t rainingiil t he 7 Sem est er and t lle om arksobt ainedby hioinin t hat wouldbc t akenint o account beforet hediplom a1S awardecl100him I Anot her Division Bench of t his Court in t he case of Bhargoand ot llersVs Baba Farid Universit vofHealt h Sciences and ot hers 2007 29 SCT 139 has observed as followsl 10 The fact s as not iced above clearlyshow t hat t he had beenadm it t edin BAMS coursein t he College No3 111 t he year 2000 and at t hat pointof t im e t lle said collegewas affiliat ed wit h Guru Nanak Dev i C 0 0 I 0 Z C I c6 C0 Z 0m Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Farid I at er on on const it ut ion of Baba of Healt h Sciences t he said JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4e r3 1 1 0 0 0 I C5 I Z W 1 I 08 OO e Z 400 CWP No8583 of2009 e23 collegecam et o be affialocd wit h Baba Farid oinMarch 2001 For a periodof som e t it net he old of Guru Nanak Dev t o t he st udent swho were alreadyadm it t ed but lat er on BabaI 2arid of Healt ll Sciencesfram ed it sown t aken The decision 13 2001 has alreadybeen ext ract edabove The said decisions shows t hat onlyt he st udent sadm it t edpriort o 2000were t o be by old The havecont inuedwit h t heirst udiesunder t he new of Baba Farid Tlleyhave in t heir fiI lal BAMS exam inat ion held in t hc inont h of MaylJune2006 I n t hese circum st ancest he and ordinancesof Baba Farid at t he t t m e of t he exam inat ioll are t o govern t he case of t he t he ordinances of Baba Farid do llOli cont ain any provisionof grace m arks as claim ed byt he The cannot claim t o have acquiredany vest ed right s m erelyon Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t hey were governedby Guru Nanak Dev account of t he fact t lat at t he t im e of adinission JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 401 v t 4 CWPNo8583 of2009 m 24m Wc do not find t hat t he oinadeby t he t hat a has been givent o t hc ordinanceof Baba Farid is j ust ied As a m at t er of fact t he case in hand is coveredbyt he of t he Suprem eCoult SubashChanderscase supt al I n view of t hedict um of t he aforesaid of t he HonbleSuprem eCourt in t he cases of SubashChanders HawaldarSinghs and t wo DivisionBenches t his Court lll Rahul Gupt aand Bhargoscases supra9t he int roduct ionof t he cany on syst emcannotbe saidt o lll operat iollSo long it was appliedt o t he exam inat ions held aft er cany Oll syst emSo 8PPlied The are not at all ent it led t o invoke eit her t he doct rine of or t he I t has been cont endedOll behalf of t he t hat 1 0 0 I 0 Z I cS r 7 Z 11 t wo nam elySim ranj itKaur and Am it Bhardwajwho had also flled writ have been t o appear in t he sem est ers exam inat ions aft er t he writ wit hdrawn Vide order dat ed Ol 022010 passedby t his Court MrPat walia asked t o le an affidavit in t his regard Affidavoithas beenfiled Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 402 1 J Wd CWPN8583 of2009 e25e 71 Q 0 0 I C5 I Z Ct I 08 W2 Z Om I n t he aforesaid of t he declarat ionof result of t hree candidat esnam edabove who wit hdrewt hewrit t o t he next seinest er adm it t ed I t is st at edin t he affidavit fi I ed by t he t he GuruNanak Dev t hat t he m at t er relat ingt o carry on syst emwas consideredby t he Com m it t ee byt he on 31072008 Thc Conlm it t ee not iced Olat since t he wit h regardt o t he uniform t he carry on syst em was not clear but cert ain personshave been adm it t edunder carry on syst em I t is 1rt heornot icedt hat were receivedfrom t he st udent s 8om various I n respectt o candidat eswho were oft he carry on syst em adm issions under t he carry on it was lell t o t he t o concem ed t o givet hem a specialchance I t is furt her m ent ioned on receiptofsuch requestfieomt he candidat est heircases for adm issionNillbe consideredlI l specialt erm Se A copy of t he decisionof t he Com m it t ee is also enclosedalongwit h t he affldavitI t is m ent ionedin t he am davit t hat lI l vlew oft he decision t he candidat eswho wit hdrew t heir writ were glven specialchancet o clear t he first and second papers along wit h 7 and 8 sem est ers JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 403 4 1 r4 CWPNo8583 of2009 e26 r 09 t hey were t o 7 and 8t h m 0 0 0 I C5 I Z a l 08 OO m Z sem est erSe Even a8er t h6se writ reservedfor som e havcbeen filed on behalfof som e of t hewrit t o wit hdrew from t he writ obviously t o t akebenefit oft he own decisionI t is also 10not e t hat t hedecision oft he grat ingrelaxat ionwas not circulat ed111 all t he select ive and has bccn appliedln a The had no of such a decisionand t hus t heycould not even applyseekingt he benet of t he decision I t is a m at t er of concern for t his Court t o not e t hat sit uat edwrit who have wit hdrawt lt heir writ have been reliefand t he presentwrit havebcen deniedt hebenefit wit hout any lawful and valid reasons Even t he carry onyst em under challengelll t hepresentwrit deserves110 int erferencein view of t he law laid down by t he Apex Court in Puniab Universit y Vs Chander and anot herand Puniab Universit yChandiparh Vs DevianiChakrabart iand ot hers6supralnor it can be said t hat t he decision t o int roduce cany Oll m id couorse is I Never t he fact rem aiils t hat t he Universit yin it s wisdom chose t o grant special chance t o Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh candidat es for clearingOrst and second sem est er JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 404 1 CWPN8583 of2009 27 7 9 1 0 0 I C I Z 08 CO Z m and were also t o 7 and 8t h wit hout t hebacklogpapers This decisionhas andnot This act ion of t he I ll I awand 1San arbit raiyexerciseof deservesno The Universit yas an I nst it ut ion hast o act in an nonarbit raiy lnanner t o all The Act ion oft he do not suggestSoe Som eof t he sit uat ed candidat eshave been t hebenefitof specialchanceand adm issionst o t hc highersem est ersdespit et heir undert hecarry on ot hershave bcen deniedsim ilar relief I n I liew of t he above circum st ailces t lle cannot be t reat ed and wit h host ililyTheyshall also be ent it ledt o t he chance t o ot her sim ilarlysit uat ed st udent sfor clearingt he papersof 1rst and second sem est ersOll uniformpat t em Their rightt o adm ission t o 718 sem est ers cannot be denied t o t hem These allowed in t he folI owingm annerl i Such of t he who have not availed specialchance for clearingflrst and second sem est ersreeappearwill be provided specialchancefor t hepurpose i0 adm issions t o t he undert he int erimordersoft his Court shall st andregulat sed Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh t o 7h18 sem est ers JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 405 1 CWPNo8583 of2009 m 28 result of t he who have 111 exam inat ionsshallbc declarede t hose who have been deniedadm issionsin 718 sem est ers Oll account of nonaclearance of secondlt hird sem est ers shall be adm issiont o 718 sem est ers as t hc case m ay be and on oft he course t heir result shall be declared v t his relaxat ion shall be available t o all st udent swho have reached718 sem est ersupt oacadet nicsession 20092010 or t ill suchim et he decision oft he Unersit y t akenvide let t erNo1737 DAA dat edOl 082008 shall rem alll I t is however opent o t he Universit yt o unifonnallyapplyt he carry on syst emt o all t he covered by cany on t o t he st udent s 4 08042010 BLS 1 PERAlI OD KOHLI JUDGE Whet hert o be referredt o t he L YES a 0 0 I C5 I Z a C I 08 00 7 Z Q Rashmi 2014.03.31 10:39 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 1 a 1 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.