Tej Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Surender Deswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one, after obtaining necessary information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. May 27, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right to Information Act, 2005.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 May 2009. The bench was SATISH KUMAR MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.