CWP No. 14005 of 2026 · Punjab & Haryana High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petitions are disposed of and the respondent No
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 215, 226, 227
Judgment
This common order shall dispose of all the aforementioned petitions. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP- 14005-2026.
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners, who have been satisfactorily serving the respondent-Corporation on various posts for more than 8–10 years, in view of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Jaggo v. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 2025 SC 296) and by this Court in Daljeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr., CWP No. 5684 of 2026 decided on 22.04.2026, as also in light of the availability of regular sanctioned posts. It is further prayed that a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the respondents to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioners, including regular pay scale along with arrears of pay and allowances, due increments, consideration of seniority and resultant promotions, from the date of their regularization.
2.1. It is also prayed that during the interregnum, till the petitioners are regularized, the respondents be directed to grant them equal pay scale along with other benefits, as are being granted to similarly situated PARUL VERMA 2026.05.08 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:7)(cid:13)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:12)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:12)(cid:12)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:9)(cid:10) * employees working against regular posts, in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh, (2017) 1 SCC 148.
2.2. It is further prayed that the respondents be restrained from terminating the services of the petitioners or taking any arbitrary action against them during the pendency of the present writ petition, in the interest of justice.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitions are disposed of and the respondent No
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 215, 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 May 2026.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.