✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 02 Feb 2010

Judgment · High Court · 2010

AO No. 919 of 2008KCPURLE7 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

63 0 iAO No919 2008 1 I N THE I I I GI I COURT OF PUNI AB AND I I ARYANA AT CI I ANDI GARI I 0 0 I I Z r I 05 r W2 I AO No 1919of Dat c of dccision 2 2008 2010 Unit cd I ndia lnsurance Com panyLt de AppclI ant e vcrsus Ranj odhSinghand ot hers Rcspondent se Present Mr Mr NGSharm a Advocat c for t hc I ndelj itSharm a Advocat c for t hc appcllant No l KCPURle J Unit cd I ndia I nsuranccCom pany dlppcl I ant has Olcd t his appcalfor sct t ingasidc t hc award dat cd 262008 passcdbyt hc lcarncd Mot or Accidcnt Claiins ribunal ludhiana 13ricflycasc of t hc claim anl is t hat on 292004 t hc claim ant on whcels of t ruck NoP13 1OGI 652 I lc was Gurm ukhSingh hcy loadcd woodcn crat cs of aut o parlsand WCrC gOlng t owardsI ocal Point Mcht a nginccrsWhcn lhcir lruck rcachcd ill flont of Rai I waySt at ion I Ollandarion GTRoad lruck bcaringNoI lR38G 9022 was spot t cdgoingahcad Thc gavc signal10 rcspondentNo I Arvind Rai drivcr of Radhika 2013.04.11 12: 46 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh t ruck NoI lR38G 9022 bul hc did nol obligcrat hcr JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 64 0 FAON09190f 2008 2 gavc a cut wit h an inlcnt ion lo hit t hc t ruck oft hc claim ant Howcvcr t hc claim ant succccdcd I ll avoidingt hc accidcnt but aller t hc t ruck of No1 ciaim ant st oppcdhis t ruck and askcd him as whyhc cannot drivc his t ruck propcrly ln t hc rcsult an alt ercat ionlook placc bct wccn t hc claim ant and Nol but t he m at t cr was pat chcdup wit h t hc lnt ervcnt ion of pcrsonswho gat hcrcdt herc At about 121 0 pm as t hc t ruck of t he claim ant rcachcd ncar Railway m C 0 0 C5d crosslng rcspondcnlNo crosscd ovcr againand st oppedt he sam cin front ofhis t ruck No1 t ook out an iron rod and st art cd Z m r I c2j CO 3 Ll sayingt hat hc would t cach him a lcsson llc st art cddragginghim out ofhis scat but claim ant did not slcp down Thcrcaflcr No l gavc blows wit h iron rod on righllcgand flngcrsof his righthand Rcspondenl Nc1 flcd away wit h his t ruck as pcoplcst arlcd gat hcringat t hc spol On FI R No181 was rcgist crcdon 281 02004 at accountof said occurrence Police St at ion l7ocal Point Ludhiana Hc was t rcalcd in Mohan Dai t iospilalLudhiana and in privat cclinics hc claim anl is slill t rcat m cntand hasalrcadyspcnta sum of Rs00001 on his t reat m cnl and is liable lo spcndanot her Rs200001 m or Sincct hc claim ant has sust ained inj uricsin t hc lust ofm ot or vchiclc and has bccoinc disablcd hc is cnt it Jcdt o claim under Scct ion 1631 oft hc Acl On not icc No5 Olcd writ t cn st at cm cnl and rcsist cd t hc claim of t hc pct it ioncrt akingprclim inaryobj cct ionst hat claim pct it ion I S not m aint ainablcas t hcrc is no ncgligcnccon t hc partof any vchicle and policehas casc undcr Scclions 323 341 325 and 506 I PC t hal t hc claimpet it ionis bad for Radhika 2013.04.11 12: 46 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh and m isj oindcrof necessarypart ies JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 65 0 FAO No9190f 2008 3 1C 0 0 I 9 I Z m r I r m Qm 4 NoA lS nol owncr of t ruck No313 lOG 1652 and insurance covcr hasbccn issucd in t hc nam c of Raj indcrSinghSOll of At narj itSingh andlhcrc is no prilil of cont ract bcllvccn NoA and insurancc t hat drivcr of t ruck bcaringrcgist ralionNol78 1OG 1652 did not valid and cffcct ivc drivingliccncc and owncr of t ruck has handcd ovcr his vchiclc lo claim ant dcspilcknowlcclgct hal ncl valid and cffect ivc I iccncc is l hiin for drivinghcavyvchiclc likc t ruck t hat t ruck t drivcn by t he claim ant did not posscss valid rcgist ralionccrt ilicalc rout c pcrm itand flt ncss ccrlificat c t hat claim ant has nol Olcd aflldavit t hat hc has not iniliat cd anv ot hcr bci7I rcan ot hcr Courl or Tribunal and t hc answcring dcfcncc rcscrvcs his right st o t akc all t hc plcas111 undcr Scct ions 147 149 157and 170 oft hc Acl Thc Tribunal has dcnied opport unilyt o rcspondcntNos12 and 4 lo lilc writ t cn st at cm ent s as t hcyfailcd t o do so I vit hinst ipulat cdpcriod l7olI owing issucs wcrc fram cd 1 Whct hcr Ranj odhSinghclaim anlsuffcrcd inj uricsin road accidcnt t hat t ook placcon 212004 wit h t ruck NolR38G No 120PA 9022 drivcn by Arvind Rai 2 Mhct hcr claim pclit ionis bad for m isj oindcrand non j oinder ofparlics9OPR 3 Whclhcr drivcr had a valid drivingI iccncc at t hc lim c of allcgcdaccidcnt it s cffect 2013R 4 Whct hcr claim ant is cnt illcd t o t hc com pcnsat ioni f so t o what am ount and from I vhichoft hc rcspondcnt s20PP 5 Rclicf Thc parlicshavc I cd lhcir rcspcclivccvidcncc Thc learncd Tribunalaft cr appraisalof t hc cvidcncc I cd byt hc part icspassedaward I I l Radhika 2013.04.11 12: 46 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 66 0 1AO No 19 19 01 2008 4 m f 0 0 Z C I 06 CO 7 t hc sum of Rs200001 in favour of claim anl and againsl No4 Sant okh Singhand rcspondcntI Vc5 wit h sit nplcint crcsl al lhc rat c of 6 pcr annum from t hc dat c of llling 01 clailn pct it ionic 222005 t ill rcalizat ion of t hc said am ount Thc I iabililyof rcspondcntNosA and 5 lo m akc paym cnlof com pcnsat ionwas ordcrcd t 0 bc j oint and scvcral Thc claim pct it ionagainstlhc rem ainingrcspondcnlsslcloddism isscd I cclingdissat isflcd wit h t hc aforcsaid alvard I ndia I nsurancc Com panvfilcd lhc presenlappcal Thc t nain gricvanccvcnlilat ed by Lnit cd I ndia l nsurancc Com panyLt d is t hat SlllCC lllc accidcnt has not t akcn placcduc t o t hc usc t hc vchiclc and as such lhc l nsurancc com pany is not I iablc I t subinit t cd t hat claim ant s havc rcceived inlrics t hc hands of not b1 USC of I llOt Or vchiclcs blil on accounl 0 pcrsonal vcndct t a and as such t hc claim pct ilionis nol m aint ainablc I havc considcrcd lhc said subm ission and hallc gonc lhrough t hc rccordsoflhc casc Thc argum cnt sadvanccd by lhc lcarncd counscl t he appcllanldocs not carry wcightt hrought hc rccordsoft hc casc ribunal has rclicd upon t hc aulhorit v Rit a Devi vs New 40 I ndia Assurancc CoUdd rcporledin 2000 ACJ 801 I n t hc said aut horit ysom c passcngcrshircd an aut o rickshaw I t hich was rccovcrcd and bodyof it s drivcr was rccovcrcd b policcai1dit was hcld t hat lhc accidcnt has ariscn out oft hc usc oft hc Mot or Vehiclcs Act ln t he 0 prcscntcasc also as pcr l act s t he rcspondcnthasput obst aclcs in t hc usc of Radhika 2013.04.11 12: 46 t hc lnolor True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh vchiclc and lhcrcaflcr causcd inj urics So It l JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document t hcsc 67 I AO No1919 of 2008 PS 5 clrcum st anccs t hc argum ent sadvanccd by t hc lcarncd counscl for t he appcllantcannot bc acccpt cd Thc appcali s wit hout any m crit and t he sanle sandsdism isscd A copy of t his j udgm cntbc scnt t o t hc irial Court ior st rict com pliancc 1 11111GE SV 1 e 21110 JI P 31 JJ 1 1 r 0 0 I Z X 08 C 7 t l Radhika 2013.04.11 12: 46 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 02 Feb 2010. The bench was KCPURLE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AO No. 919 of 2008). ← Search more judgments