✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 08 Jan 2010

ECit yProj ect sConst ruct ion Pvt Lt d 09e Pet it ioner v. Union Territ ory and ot hers

Case Details Punjab & Haryana High Court · 08 Jan 2010
Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Decided
08 Jan 2010
Bench
—
Length
3,231 words

Summary

A structured summary for this judgment hasn’t been prepared yet. The full text is below.

Precedent status

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

Original judgment text

Learned counsel for t he pet it ionerhas cont ended t hat t he 1 Not ificat ion2622004 P69 issued under Sub Sect ion 19of Seclion 30f 1955Act is not t o t he act ivit yof t he pet it ioneras t he sam e pert alns Cinem a Ent ert ainm ent I t has funher been arguedt hat 1 0 C I C5 I Z r I a5 7 Z t l no separat e dut y on t he Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Not ificat ion regardingt he chargingof ent ert ainm ent gam es has been issued by t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 92 e CWP Noe7559of 2009 11414 C 0 C I C5 I Z C I C45 nm w Z Qw under 1955 Act and t herefore order dat ed 182005 P5I 1S liable t o be set aside beingwhollywit hout j urisdict ionLearned counsel has also t hat t he im pugnedorder dat ed 1822005 P9 wasneit her served upon t he andno dem and t ax not ice of Annexure P5 was issued becam e awareof t he assessm ent orderonlyon 30A2009 upon t he receiptoft he t ax dem and not ice dat ed 10A2009 and t hereaft ert he PresentWrit was filed raisingt he quest ionsofj urisdict ion Per cont ra learned counsel for t he cont endedt hat t he Not ificat iondat ed 2622004 P69 issued by t he Com pet ent Aut horit yin exercise under Sub Sect iorl9 of Sect ion 30f 1955 Act wherebyt he rat e of ent ert ainm entdut ywas reduced t o 30I o was t o all ot her act ivit ies falling wit hin t he deflnit ion of Ent ert ainm entbesides t he Cinem a act ivit ies Therefore no separat e Not iflcat ionfor each act ivit ywas requiredHe has furt her raised t he pleaof ofalt ernat ive rem edydelayc laches The obj ect ionof delayand laches is not beingent ert ained becauset he in t heir replyhavenowherest at edt hat as t o how and lI l what m anner assessm ent order had been served upon t he pet it ioner it is also very difflcult t o acceptt hat t he pet it ionerwould not be of such an assessm ent order aft er having in t he However is also not disput edlat t ill April 2009 no dem andnot ice in pursuanceof t he assessm ent order had been served I t is also an adm it t edcase byt hepart iest hat in respectof assessm ent yearsno ent ert ainm entdut yhas been paidnor any assessm ent Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh have been init iat ed Furt herno doubt an alt ernat iverem edyin t he shapeof JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 93 CWP Noe7559of2009 8514 t o be filed wit hin 30 daysof such order under Sect ion 114l of 1955 Act is available and t he writ pet it ionhas been Oled wit hin 30 daysof of dem and not ice However inst ead of relegat ingt he pet it ionert o avail it s alt ernat iverem edywe have t o decide t he case since t he of Not ificat ion dat ed 2622004 369 and lack of j urisdict ionin passingt he im pugnedassessm ent order 6P59has been raised Therefore t he prelim inaryobj ect ionsraised are rej ect ed We have givenour considerat ion t o ot her rival subm issionsandt he pleadingsof t he part iesThe short issue raised byt he for our considerat ion is whet hert he Not icat ion dat ed 262004 Annexure P69 would be act ivit ies t o t he act ivit iesot her t han Cinem a or not I t would be for proper t o refer t o t he definit ion of ent ert ainm entand levyof t he Ent ert ainm entdut yunder 1955 Act Sub clause d9 of Sect ion 20f 1955 Act defines ent ert ainm ent and Sub Sect ion 619of Sect ion 3 of 1955 Act levy of ent ert ainm entdut y which readsas under includes any exhibit ion am usem ent gam e sport or t o which persons are ordinarilyadm it t ed on paym entor exhibit ion of m ovingpict uresor seriesofpict ureswhich are shown on t he film s or 56 1 t elevisionreceivingset wit h t he aid of any t ype of ant enna wit h a cable net work at t achedt o it or cable t elevision for which persons are requiredt o m ake paym entby way of cont ribut ion or subscript ionor inst allat ion and connect ion chargesor any ot her chargescollect ed in any m anner r 0 C C5 Z t r I a5 w Z t l what soever 3 Dut y on paym ent sfor adm ission t o ent ert ainm ent se A person adm it t ed t o an ent ert ainm entshall be liable t o pay JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh 94 CWP Noe7559of 2009 868 an ent ert ainm ent dut yat a rat e lnotexceedingone hundred and t went yflve per cent um of t he paym entfor adm issionl which t heGovernm entm ay specifyby a not ificat ionin t his behalf and t he said dut yshall be collect ed byt he propriet or andrenderedt o t he Governm entin t he m anner A plainreadingof definit ion of ent ert ainm entreveals t hatt here aret wo part sconcerningt he definit ion of ent ert ainm entwhich is ext ensive nat ure First part relat es t o any exhibit ion am usem ent race t o which a personis ordinarilyadm it t edon paym entand t he secondpartrelat es t o exhibit ion of fllm s or pict ures novingor series9 OI l t elevisionset s for which persons are t o m ake paym entin t he 1 m odes I n t he presentcase we are concernedwit h t he first partof t he definit ionwhich relat es t o t he act ivit yundert akenby t he pet it ioner nam elyplayingof video gam eson m achinesbyinsert ionof coin ofdenom inat ionofRsOl byt he m em bersof public I t has been adm it t ed byt he in t heir replydat ed 172005 6PA9t o t he show not ice 6P2 well as in t he st at em ent 1012005 0l of Sh Kum ar Team Coordinat or Finance of t he Com panyt hat wef 72200416 video gam esm achineshad been inst alled in t heprem isesoft he which are open t o t he m em bersof publicfor playing videogam eson insert ion ofcoins oft he denom inat ionofRs101 per gam e The am ount ofrevenue from t hesegam eshasalso been adm it t ed I t has not been disput ed111anym anner by t he learned counsel for t he pet it ionert hatt he act ivit yundert akenby t he pet it ioneris fully coveredby t he t est l crit eria laid down byHonble t he Suprem eCourt in Mls Geet a r 0 C I C5 Z I C45 7 Z Om Ent erprisesscase supral so as t o be covered under t he deft nit ion of Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Ent ert ainm ent What has been urged1S t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and t he integrity of this document 95 CWP Noe7559of2009 14714 dat ed 2622004 6P69t o such act ivit yundert aken by t he A readingof Sub Sect ion 619of Sect ion 30f 1955 Act m akes it t hat an ent ert ainm entdut ybecom espayablet he m om entt he person is adm it t edt o an and at such rat es which t heGovernm ent m ay speci67by Not icat ion which cannot be m ore t han hundredand t went yfive per cent um of t he am ount paidby t he person foradm ission t o such an ent ert ainm ent I t is furt her clear t hat such dut y which becom es has t o be collect ed byt he propriet orand rendered t o t heGovernm enin t he m anner I n t he presentcase it has not beendisput edt hat 1955 Act t o UT What has beencont ended is t hat AnnexureP69 t he cont ent s of Not i8cat ion dat ed 2622004 do not relat e t o act ivit ies like t he video gam es et c and t herefore no ent ert ainm entdut ycan beleviedand collect ed We are a8aid 1 0 C0 I C5 I Z t C I C6 t hat t heargum entis wholly m isconceived Ent ert ainm entdut y becom es payableon any act ivit ybeingundert akenanywherewhenever a person 1S adm it t edt o suchact ivit ywhich falls wit hin t he de8nit ion of ent ert ainm ent 1 m n Z 0 No separat eNot ificat ion wit h regardt o act lvlt leS 1S envisagedunder t he of 1955 Act Whatis providedunder Sub Clause 61 ofSect ion 3 0f1955 Act byissue ofNot iflcat ion byt heGovernm ent is t he rat e ofdut yt o be chargedwhich in any case lS not t o exceedone hundred and t went y 1 fiveper cent oft he paym entofadm ission chargesof ent ert alnm ent Adm inist rat ion by issue of Annexure P6 has only t he rat e of dut yt o 30I o inst ead of exist ing 50010on all publicClnem a exhibit ionsor any ot her ent ert ainm entplace Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh fallingin t he area of Union Territ ory I t has been specifically JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 0 0 C5 I Z C I 08 m W3 Z 96 1 CWP Noe7559of 2009 11811 t hat new rat e of30I o dut yis applicablet o any ot her ent ert ainm ent placebesidest he publicCinem a exhibit ionsin t he area of UT Thusit would m ean t hat t he act ivit ies like t he one undert akenbYt he would be exigiblet o ent ert ainm ent dut yat 30I o wef 262004 dat e of issue of Not iflcat ion P61 Thus it can be concluded t hat Not ificat iondat ed 2622004 AnnexureP69is fully t o t he case oft he m akingit liable t o pay Ent ert ainm entdut y The legalposit ionregardingexigibilit yt o Ent ert ainm entdut y on video gam es locat edin video areas hasbeen reit erat edbyHonble t he Court in St andard Gam es and Ot hers Ve St at e of UeP and Ot hers 199614 SCC 467 and St at e of MP and Anot her v Abha Set hi Sm t 199914 SCC 32 No ot herpointhas been urged I n view of t he aforesaid discussion we find no m erit in t he inst antpet it ionhence t he sam e is dism issed We are const rainedt o observe about t he funct ioningof t he offt cials t he Adm inist rat ion A huge Ent ert ainm entdut yliabilit yof t he was assessed on 182005 and direct ions were issued t o issue a t ax dem and not ice However t ill April 2009 no suchdem and not ice was issued for reasons best known t o t hem I n t he replyfiled by t he Depart m entno speci6c 4 averm ent shave been m ade wit h regardt o t he m anner of service of t he order Despit ea clear flndingin t he assessm ent order in respect of year 2004e05 6upt o31 Decem ber 20049regardingliabilit yt o pay Ent ert ainm entdut yno st epswere t akenfor fram ing assessm ent years The sit ualion is deplorableWe JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document andrealizat ion for t he Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh 97 CWP No7559 of 2009 14914 t hat som e rem edial st epswould be t aken byAdm inist rat ion A fact inquiryshall be held by flxingliabilit yof t he ofcer who has of his dut yt o helpt he pet it ionerThe needful shall bedone wit hin t hree m ont hs and a copy of t he reportbe placedon record We furt her directt hat a copy of t his order be sent t o t he Adm inist rat or UT em a 1 MMKum arl Judge t 8 012010 m anoJ l4 1 C 0 3 I C5 Z l I 08 r Z Rawat Seem a 2014.03.28 10: 45 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments