Pankaj Bansal & Anr. v. Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Limited, Chandigarh & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. J.S. Mehndiratta, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated
27.6.2011 (Annexure P-21), whereby the request of the petitioners to appoint an Arbitrator has been declined. So far as the quashing of orders dated 7.4.2008, 13.5.2008, 17.7.2008 and 25.6.2009, copies of which have been annexed with this petition as Annexures P-8, P-10, P-13 and P-17, respectively, is concerned, the writ petition (CWP No. 19706 of 2009) filed by the petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn on 24.12.2009 with liberty to approach the respondents for appointment of an Arbitrator. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with CWP No. 19662 of 2011 -2- liberty to file an appropriate application under the Arbitration Act, against the order dated 27.6.2011 (Annexure P-21), declining their prayer to appoint an Arbitrator or to avail any other alternative remedy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 19, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.