Vijay Patial @ Vicky Patial & Anr. v. Manu Patial & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 23 Jan 2025
- Bench
- ALKA SARIN
Provisions considered
Judgment
Present : Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of complaint bearing No.COMA/268 of 2020 dated 04.09.2020 filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Annexure P-2) and the impugned order dated 07.09.2020 (Annexure P-3).
In view of the judgment dated 25.10.2024 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CR-3407-2024, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
23.01.2025 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Yogesh Sharma 2025.01.24 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — s. 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Jan 2025. The bench was ALKA SARIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.