Smt. Shakuntla Devi v. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 03 Oct 2011
- Bench
- SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, PARAMJEET SINGH
Provisions considered
Judgment
Smt. Shakuntla Devi State of Punjab and others Versus .... PETITIONER ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. P.S. Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) In the instant writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 18.11.2008 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Competent Authority -cum- Executive Engineer, Construction Division No.3, PWD B&R Branch, Ferozepur. This order was passed under Section 143 (2) of Chapter 14 of the Punjab Regional Town Planning & Development Act, 1995, whereby the order of demolition of the shop of the petitioner has been issued. Such an order is appealable under Section 145 of the said Act. However, the petitioner has not availed the remedy of appeal. In view of the aforesaid facts, learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail CWP No. 18613 of 2011 -2- the aforesaid remedy of appeal in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner files the appeal under the aforesaid provision within a period of one month from today, the Appellate Authority shall decide the same on merits. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 03, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.