Judgment · High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 26 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2026.04.28 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:10)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the (cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 24.04.2026 as per Hindu rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-5) has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-7) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, and she confines her prayer that the representation may be examined. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, (cid:21)(cid:13)(cid:4)(cid:2)! (cid:26)(cid:24)(cid:8)(cid:2)" (cid:26)(cid:11)#(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:2)(cid:23)(cid:23)$(cid:22)(cid:2) %(cid:26)(cid:11)&(cid:26)(cid:10)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:2)accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. She submits that she has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon with a direction to the respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2026.04.28 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:10)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-7) and take appropriate action for protection (cid:5)’(cid:5)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, for requisite compliance. ( (cid:6)(cid:2)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:2)(cid:8)(cid:13)(cid:2)(cid:19)(cid:8)(cid:13)(cid:18)(cid:9)(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:19)(cid:2)(cid:9)(cid:27)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:2) (cid:2) (cid:2) (cid:27)12&3(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:7)0(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:10)(cid:12)(cid:19)(cid:13) 2 4(cid:13) 2#2 (cid:13) (cid:1) (cid:1) (cid:6) (cid:1) (cid:6) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:2) (cid:13) (cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:25)(cid:29)(cid:31)(cid:24)(cid:13) (cid:12)/(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:15)(cid:29)(cid:13)+(cid:19)(cid:13)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:27)(cid:2)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:18)(cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:15)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:6)(cid:6) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:15)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:9)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:6) (cid:6) (cid:17)(cid:6)(cid:18)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:14)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:6) (cid:17)(cid:6)(cid:18)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:14)(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:6) RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2026.04.28 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 24 Apr 2026.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.